RE: Pentagon questions Obama's soldier story

RE: Pentagon questions Obama's soldier story (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

xBullx -> RE: Pentagon questions Obama's soldier story (2/24/2008 2:46:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sinergy Which would distinguish him from any other candidate how? All the Republicans seem to be fighting over is who can torture the most people, stay in Iraq the longest, put the most people in prison, and criminalize women's health care. Most of the time, I think Billary belongs in that group. Sinergy So the way I read your post right here is that you happen to agree with me that Obama is just another case of "politics the norm"............Interesting.

Sinergy -> RE: Pentagon questions Obama's soldier story (2/24/2008 2:56:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: xBullx quote: ORIGINAL: Sinergy Which would distinguish him from any other candidate how? All the Republicans seem to be fighting over is who can torture the most people, stay in Iraq the longest, put the most people in prison, and criminalize women's health care. Most of the time, I think Billary belongs in that group. Sinergy So the way I read your post right here is that you happen to agree with me that Obama is just another case of "politics the norm"............Interesting. I think he stands a better chance of hiring people who can manage our economy, making friends, not making stupid appointments, not screwing a bunch of people who had the bad luck to get hit by a storm predicted for years, etc., than anybody else running. Im not sure if that equates to my "support of politics of the norm," whatever that actually means, but as I have said dozens of times, Im not a member of any political party and will vote for Obama, otherwise it will be Nader. Sinergy

xBullx -> RE: Pentagon questions Obama's soldier story (2/24/2008 3:03:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sinergy I think he stands a better chance of hiring people who can manage our economy, making friends, not making stupid appointments, not screwing a bunch of people who had the bad luck to get hit by a storm predicted for years, etc., than anybody else running. Im not sure if that equates to my "support of politics of the norm," whatever that actually means, but as I have said dozens of times, Im not a member of any political party and will vote for Obama, otherwise it will be Nader. Sinergy Hmmmm, now you're simply voting for a good business manager. Hell, perhaps I could be your President....

Sinergy -> RE: Pentagon questions Obama's soldier story (2/24/2008 3:19:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: xBullx Hmmmm, now you're simply voting for a good business manager. Hell, perhaps I could be your President.... I dont know your qualifications. One would imagine that a person with a Yale MBA would make a good business manager. AnencephalyBoy proves this statement false. Business as usual would be electing another lying politician who thinks with his gut and hires people who give money to his campaign to important posts (like head of FEMA) with no regard for intelligence, experience, or skill sets. Sinergy

wkdshadow -> RE: Pentagon questions Obama's soldier story (2/24/2008 3:26:04 PM)
The book you cite uses the word "probably" which is a word of opinion and assumption in this use, and there is no citation for this assumption(it's not supported by citation 3), or even a guestimate for the weight of explosives used since the chinese invented gunpowder, and no distinction inbetween napalm and explosives in the article text - it's about pure tonnage dropped. We don't even know what greek fire was, let alone how much was used. Your statement quote: We dropped more explosives on Vietnam than had been blown up combined in human history. is not supported by your citation. quote: I dont know. What does your post have to do with the point I am making? Please refrain from answering direct questions(especially multiple ones!) with a question. This is not jeopardy. The "point" that you're trying to make that's been questioned with no actual rebuttals on your part in this situation is quote: Of course, Vietnam proved aerial bombardment doesnt work either. quote: Must suck when the point you think you are arguing ends up being completely irrelevant to the discussion. How is that working for you? What can I say, I can get trolled easily trying to combat a statement which has no basis in fact or reality.

xBullx -> RE: Pentagon questions Obama's soldier story (2/24/2008 3:37:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sinergy I dont know your qualifications. One would imagine that a person with a Yale MBA would make a good business manager. AnencephalyBoy proves this statement false. Business as usual would be electing another lying politician who thinks with his gut and hires people who give money to his campaign to important posts (like head of FEMA) with no regard for intelligence, experience, or skill sets. Well I won't bore you with my qualifications, but I did sell my half of a very successful business and have a great start on another. All that and no MBA. I would say that having an MBA does demonstrate you at least turned in most of your homework. But as I sit here watching the NFL draft I see a lot of fellows that have degrees and I wonder how many of them will find that beneficial. I'm not all that sure you can have the kind of money to campaign with that Obama has and not have a few folks thinking you owe them. Maybe even Oprah? As far as his appointments go, you can only speculate what he might do, and in that case he is no further ahead than McCain. Speculation is risky business, I used to spec trade a good deal, even with a solid understanding of charts there are the hinden agendas of the Funds. I'm hopin' you're following all that. Bull

Sinergy -> RE: Pentagon questions Obama's soldier story (2/24/2008 3:43:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: wkdshadow quote: I dont know. This is an answer to your question. I found your response irrelevant and meaningless in the context of what I posted. Therefore... quote: quote: What does your post have to do with the point I am making? Please refrain from answering direct questions(especially multiple ones!) with a question. Sure. Although this would be a new question, not an answer to your question. Now answer my question since I answered yours. Sinergy p.s. If you decide to say "I dont know" then I will respond "Then what exactly is it's relevance to the point Im making."

Owner59 -> RE: Pentagon questions Obama's soldier story (2/24/2008 3:57:21 PM)
quote: wkdshadow: "You can be quiet now". I always love it when the obtuse turn nasty. How is that working for you? DrPhilergy Good job ,Dr. Philergy.

wkdshadow -> RE: Pentagon questions Obama's soldier story (2/24/2008 4:03:04 PM)
Put simply, you have no real point to make... your response is "I don't know" to the challenges of logic reflected in your posts. Addressing another portion of post #39, There's always been pockets of insurgents left after any given war, and always been post occupation in a reigme change of any sort. While we declaired "mission accomplished", we're still there(contrary to your post!). And technically, we successfully instituted regime change and now we're fighting a completely different force, the original mission of institute reigme change from a sovereign dictatorship to a modern imperial state has been accomplished, now we're just preventing a civil war and enforcing our forced psuedo-democracy on people that don't want it. So, all in all, post #39 and subsequent posts really have no point at all, it's just been us bickering back and forth. I'm done now though, and see exactly what caitlyn meant earlier.

bipolarber -> RE: Pentagon questions Obama's soldier story (2/24/2008 4:40:15 PM)
So, they have the freedom to do with their country as they like. Don't they? Or are we there to establish a US colony? Often times, I begin to realize the forces that created Saddam. Several religious factions all at each other's throats, and surrounded by other, equally insane governments. No doubt the schmuck had to pretend he had WMD just to keep the neighbors at bay, and halfway cautious about invading. The problem is, now that we are there, we're slowly turning into the same kind of monster. "We have met the enemy, and he is us." -Pogo

Sinergy -> RE: Pentagon questions Obama's soldier story (2/24/2008 4:45:38 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: wkdshadow we're still there(contrary to your post!). I said we are not there? Sinergy

thompsonx -> RE: Pentagon questions Obama's soldier story (2/26/2008 5:30:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: wkdshadow The book you cite uses the word "probably" which is a word of opinion and assumption in this use, and there is no citation for this assumption(it's not supported by citation 3), or even a guestimate for the weight of explosives used since the chinese invented gunpowder, and no distinction inbetween napalm and explosives in the article text - it's about pure tonnage dropped. We don't even know what greek fire was, let alone how much was used. Your statement quote: We dropped more explosives on Vietnam than had been blown up combined in human history. is not supported by your citation. I am sure you did notice the part where it listed the tonnage of 6.3 million tons of ordinance dropped by the U.S. by the end of 1971. I am sure you also went on to read about the spilling of fifty thousand tons of agents orange,blue and white on Vietnam and how that has a long term effect of destroying the productivity of the land and the forest that grew there for generations to come. I am sure that you also read about how the U.S. specifically targeted hospitals,schools and non military industrial targets. Since I am sure you read the whole book so you must be aware that the author uses the word probably in a very specific fashion while at the same time giving actual numbers for total tonnage of ordinance dropped both during WWII and Vietnam. That being said I am unclear as to just what you are disagreeing with. If we consider the whole country is about 125,000 square miles and steel weighs about 500 pounds a cubic foot how thick a plate of steel would that make covering the whole country. Now consider how thick that plate would be when we remember the size of North Vietnam alone. thompson

Sinergy -> RE: Pentagon questions Obama's soldier story (2/26/2008 5:33:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: wkdshadow we successfully instituted regime change Successfully? Sinergy edited to point out that you make the claim we instituted a psuedo-democracy on people who do not want it. Doesnt that disprove your earlier use of the word "successfully?"

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 4 [5]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125