White House INTENTIONALLY destroyed email? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


farglebargle -> White House INTENTIONALLY destroyed email? (2/27/2008 3:22:52 PM)

Either *everyone* involved was unimaginably incompetent ( which should freak you out about *other* security issues, perhaps the US needs to publicly account for all their WMD? ) or they're criminals.

Obstruction of Justice anyone?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23367672/




Sinergy -> RE: White House INTENTIONALLY destroyed email? (2/27/2008 3:25:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Either *everyone* involved was unimaginably incompetent ( which should freak you out about *other* security issues, perhaps the US needs to publicly account for all their WMD? ) or they're criminals.

Obstruction of Justice anyone?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23367672/


[sarcasm]

Well, it pales in comparison to Blowjobgate, as any of the Neo-Cons will be first to say.

[/sarcasm]

Sinergy




farglebargle -> RE: White House INTENTIONALLY destroyed email? (2/27/2008 3:28:08 PM)

I *seriously* can't get my head around this.

It's just *IMPOSSIBLE* for *any* team of IT Professionals to permit this to happen.

-- And if they're *NOT* hiring Competent Professionals, what does that say about the security of the Nukes, Poison War Gasses, etc?





Feric -> RE: White House INTENTIONALLY destroyed email? (2/27/2008 3:28:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Either *everyone* involved was unimaginably incompetent ( which should freak you out about *other* security issues, perhaps the US needs to publicly account for all their WMD? ) or they're criminals.

Obstruction of Justice anyone?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23367672/


Isn't it interesting that W and his boys continue to insist that they're above the law, but then they go and destroy evidence? The only reason you destroy evidence is if you know what you're doing is illegal.




pahunkboy -> RE: White House INTENTIONALLY destroyed email? (2/27/2008 3:30:06 PM)

If I were the boss?  I would take away email from the white house.  It is un-necessary.  I tend to think the data is somewhere and some teck geek could find it.




farglebargle -> RE: White House INTENTIONALLY destroyed email? (2/27/2008 3:32:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

If I were the boss?  I would take away email from the white house.  It is un-necessary.  I tend to think the data is somewhere and some teck geek could find it.



Make them use telegrams STOP
That would result in a complete set of documentation STOP
Oh, shit... Western Union stopped delivering telegrams STOP
Although they probably still have telexes... STOP.





pahunkboy -> RE: White House INTENTIONALLY destroyed email? (2/27/2008 3:34:45 PM)

tho how is an email diff then a phone call?   is there a paper record of phone call converstaions??




Sinergy -> RE: White House INTENTIONALLY destroyed email? (2/27/2008 3:36:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

-- And if they're *NOT* hiring Competent Professionals, what does that say about the security of the Nukes, Poison War Gasses, etc?



Has this administration EVER hired a competent professional to do anything?

Sinergy

p.s.  Ok, that was harsh, they had to hire somebody to throw under a bus.




pahunkboy -> RE: White House INTENTIONALLY destroyed email? (2/27/2008 3:45:50 PM)

hey OP,  why are you even concerned with that?  i mean- the recent buzz in "britanny-land"-   she cant have a lawyer but has one. then   .....

i can just see privatised 911.  ring ring. your call is iimporant to us -please listen as we have changed out voice menu. pls visit our website....   did you know ....  "i think you said shop at 911 mall"




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125