RE: blocked users for sub women

RE: blocked users for sub women (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive

Message

lustiwench -> RE: blocked users for sub women (9/25/2005 10:44:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: fastlane Fastlane is blocked too, but metamusal and prunes should free me up....I hope. Damn cramps, now I know what you pretty ladies go through. smiles, Kevin....like a baby ready to poop. LMAO

sweetpettjenny -> RE: blocked users for sub women (9/26/2005 2:48:53 AM)
Not quite sure how bashing others fits in the forum here quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: theRose4U quote: No, I am just curious why you would want to refer to a 6' 3" 285 pound Man as "darling". Because Rain, sweetcheeks & snooky wookems just doesn't fit :P See, that's what I am talkin' about ..... YOU got it to fit! That is special in my book. Ron

BlkTallFullfig -> RE: blocked users for sub women (9/26/2005 7:09:53 AM)
quote: No, I am just curious why you would want to refer to a 6' 3" 285 pound Man as "darling". I would rather not enter a battle of wits with you here in this public forum. Why don't you want to be a darling? M

WickedKev -> RE: blocked users for sub women (9/26/2005 10:14:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: KatyLied WickedKev quote: Had an interesting email the other day simply said 'Master I need you' nothing else Had never in my life talked to this girl before. Braggart!!!! [:D] Moi???? (Looks around innocently......)

littleone35 -> RE: blocked users for sub women (9/26/2005 5:30:25 PM)
Well both my late master and myseld were both married (to others) but we were up front with that right from the start. We just had needs that our vanilla partners could not or would not satisfiy. Now this is not for everyone but it worked for us. littleone Sorry about the mispelling.

girl4you2 -> RE: blocked users for sub women (9/26/2005 6:49:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: sweetpettjenny Not quite sure how bashing others fits in the forum here quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: theRose4U quote: No, I am just curious why you would want to refer to a 6' 3" 285 pound Man as "darling". Because Rain, sweetcheeks & snooky wookems just doesn't fit :P See, that's what I am talkin' about ..... YOU got it to fit! That is special in my book. Ron that wasn't bashing, that was hysterically hilarious!

Bluetemptation -> RE: blocked users for sub women (9/27/2005 4:18:19 PM)
actually I do not block, I write unfriendly answers that make some of those doms call me a fake ... not my problem - I am really short tempered when it's about stupidity and I don't want to deal with it any other way ... or I just stop answering, they get their clue, sooner or later ... and I don't have to look after a blocklist,

RainGod -> RE: blocked users for sub women (9/27/2005 4:31:11 PM)
quote: that wasn't bashing, that was hysterically hilarious! I was just making sure it wasn't some sort of flirting. lol

kimmypuss -> RE: blocked users for sub women (9/27/2005 10:21:47 PM)
Yes, I got called a fake...because I didn't answer an email within 5 minutes... lol I think that particular person has a history I don't care to know about. First a wooing, then when I didn't reply - immediately : "Get lost you're a fake" and a further "fake queer". Gotta love that Block button. [:D] Other than that, so far...been here about a week...I've had some very nice mail.

RainGod -> RE: blocked users for sub women (9/28/2005 8:42:16 AM)
quote: Yes, I got called a fake...because I didn't answer an email within 5 minutes... If you didn't give a reply, and they knew nothing more of you than your profile (which is what promted them to write in the first place), how then can they assume you are a fake? Is there some sort of timed email response gauge with which to measure the true level of submission? Will the wonders of science never cease? Sounds to Me like some internet geek got his shorts in a wad because you didn't jump as quickly to write back as he did to write. Know what? Fuck 'em. Or better still... don't fuck 'em. People like that should be reduced to fucking themselves.. lol edited for a typo

kimmypuss -> RE: blocked users for sub women (9/28/2005 8:12:57 PM)
lol with RainGod... He wasn't accusing me of being a fake sub, but a fake...woman. [sm=rolleyes.gif] Seems he's had a history of that. I know it's not my problem at all. Could almost feel sorry for him, if he hadn't been so rude.

MistressKay -> RE: blocked users for sub women (9/28/2005 8:37:47 PM)
You are certainly not alone as so many have already shared. One thing however that I would like to add is this... Online people get to be anything they dream of so for many the online world IS a fantasy that they will never get the chance to live in real life. Eventually whoever they are chatting with will realize that it's not real and they will move on to the next player in their game. Most mean no harm for this is the only excitement they have in their lives... for those who can't live the lifestyle, the online world is the only opportunity to explore without compromising their vanilla lives. I am not condoning their actions - far from it - but perhaps when we come across those "players" we can remember that not all of us have the luxuary of living our dreams. For those who live this lifestyle, how truly fortunate we are! I know that without bdsm in my life I would never feel complete as a sexual woman. BDSM is how I express my passion to my submissive partner. wishing all compassion, understanding and a dash of tolerance, Lady Kay PS - blocking IS a nice way of saying "no thank you" - use it freely!

annapolisfemme -> RE: blocked users for sub women (9/28/2005 10:08:06 PM)
Ahhhhh if only there were a "block" button we could hit in real life!!!!

ModeratorEleven -> RE: blocked users for sub women (9/28/2005 10:12:27 PM)
I think they call it a "Restraining Order." XI

Evilsgirl -> RE: blocked users for sub women (9/29/2005 6:33:18 AM)
and here i always heard a restaining order was another way to say i love you......sorry....bad joke.......<going to corner now> Evilsgirl

RainGod -> RE: blocked users for sub women (9/30/2005 2:41:20 PM)
Mod 11 said: quote: I think they call it a "Restraining Order." ...Or a swift knee to the jewels. Restraining orders take too long to be responed to, and in some states you actually have to PAY for one. Nut busting is free, lol.

RainGod -> RE: blocked users for sub women (9/30/2005 2:44:43 PM)
kimmypuss: quote: He wasn't accusing me of being a fake sub, but a fake...woman. Seems he's had a history of that. I know it's not my problem at all. Could almost feel sorry for him, if he hadn't been so rude. Lol... okay, he was questioned whether you were actually a female versus a male posing as a female? lmao!! Could this have possibly been a very tricky way to try to get you to show him nudes of you? Damn... horndoggery is evolving!

NYDiscipline -> RE: blocked users for sub women (10/1/2005 5:58:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Evilsgirl and here i always heard a restaining order was another way to say i love you......sorry....bad joke.......<going to corner now> Evilsgirl I think I've seen a t-shirt like that....

Aileen68 -> RE: blocked users for sub women (10/1/2005 6:31:45 AM)
tshirthell dot com

comesoncommand -> RE: blocked users for sub women (10/1/2005 12:02:40 PM)
The weeding through of all the dommabees (lol...wanna be Dominants) to try and find quality P/people is a game enjoyed by A/all who attempt to sort through online dating and come out victorious. Very frustrating, but not limited to collarme. Nope, not just you. i'm owned, and my profile states such and i still get a ton of email from Dominants. Happily, there are mail controls that allow for this slave (and Her busy Master) to not have to be bothered by any of those [:D]...and those that become annoying through other mediums (i.e. chat requests, etc) simply get the block :). i know it is frustrating, but can speak from personal experience waiting to find a true Master is well worth the wait.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875