Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Clinton and Obama disagree on Florida, Michigan revote


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Clinton and Obama disagree on Florida, Michigan revote Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Clinton and Obama disagree on Florida, Michigan revote - 3/13/2008 12:35:34 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
So basically the party that can't even organise its own internal elections wants to run the Free World.  Wonderfull.......

(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Clinton and Obama disagree on Florida, Michigan revote - 3/13/2008 1:22:44 PM   
celticlord2112


Posts: 5732
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy
It is important to have an idea of your subject matter before you start a thread.

Florida and Michigan changed the date of their primaries to try and make their states votes more relevant...You can't do it. It only makes sense. So the DNC ruled that both states delegates would not be seated at the party convention. All of the Democratic candidates agreed not to campaign in Florida and Michigan before the primary.




There's nothing intrinsically rational about the particular rule the Florida and Michigan Legislatures violated. It is an arbitrary rule and an arbitrary date. That which is arbitrary is inherently irrational by definition.

Here is the text of the rule that was broken, straight from the DNC website:
quote:


11. TIMING OF THE DELEGATE SELECTION PROCESS
A. No meetings, caucuses, conventions or primaries which constitute the first determining stage in
the presidential nomination process (the date of the primary in primary states, and the date of the
first tier caucus in caucus states) may be held prior to the first Tuesday in February or after the
second Tuesday in June in the calendar year of the national convention. Provided, however, that
the Iowa precinct caucuses may be held no earlier than 22 days before the first Tuesday in
February; that the Nevada first-tier caucuses may be held no earlier than 17 days before the
first Tuesday in February; that the New Hampshire primary may be held no earlier than 14
days before the first Tuesday in February; and that the South Carolina primary may be held
no earlier than 7 days before the first Tuesday in February. In no instance may a state which
scheduled delegate selection procedures on or between the first Tuesday in February and the
second Tuesday in June 1984 move out of compliance with the provisions of this rule.


Interestingly, in reviewing the actual text of the rules, I came across this interesting tidbit:
quote:

20.C.1.A
Violation of timing: In the event the Delegate Selection Plan of a state party
provides or permits a meeting, caucus, convention or primary which constitutes
the first determining stage in the presidential nominating process to be held prior
to or after the dates for the state as provided in Rule 11 of these rules, or in the
event a state holds such a meeting, caucus, convention or primary prior to or after
such dates, the number of pledged delegates elected in each category allocated to
the state pursuant to the Call for the National Convention shall be reduced by
fifty (50%) percent, and the number of alternates shall also be reduced by fifty
(50%) percent. In addition, none of the members of the Democratic National
Committee and no other unpledged delegate allocated pursuant to Rule 8.A. from
that state shall be permitted to vote as members of the state’s delegation. In
determining the actual number of delegates or alternates by which the state’s
delegation is to be reduced, any fraction below .5 shall be rounded down to the
nearest whole number, and any fraction of .5 or greater shall be rounded up to the
next nearest whole number.


Curiously enough, this tracks exactly with the course of action taken by the RNC in response to similar rules violations for their primary process.

For whatever reason, the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee exercised their powers under 20.C.5 to impose additional sanctions on Florida and Michigan exclusively.

Moreover, by the text of the rule Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina's primaries (caucus for Iowa) were also in violation, and no punishment was meted out at all.

If "rules are rules", then the results for Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina should similarly be invalidated. As an interesting side note, such a course eliminates a good chunk of Obama's delegate lead.

Shame on the legislatures for not reading the rule book and taking it seriously. Shame also on the DNC for committing the same sin. Double shame on the candidates for not articulating equitable treatment per the letter of the rules to which they agreed.

_____________________________



(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Clinton and Obama disagree on Florida, Michigan revote - 3/13/2008 3:13:11 PM   
orfunboi


Posts: 1223
Joined: 10/22/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PlayfulOne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

If I recall correctly...Clinton did not campain but her name was on the ballots in those states, the only Demcrate..and won...so I am not surprised she wants those votes.


Wrong,

Clinton, Obama, Edwards, Biden, Kucinich, Gravel, Dodd, and Richardson were all on the ballot.  Now we know, Biden, Dodd, Kucinich, and Richardson all dropped out before the primary, but they were still on the ballot.

You can't claim to be an "agent of change" and want to exclude one of the more populous states just because you might not win.

Clinton never campaigned here.  She never spoke she nly flew in for the fund raisers and left.  Of course there were pictures, have you ever noticed the horde of cameras that follow them around?

The  DNC thought it would be easy and those stated wouldn't matter.  Well now its so close that they do.

K


There were only 2 on the ballot here, Clinton and someone else or undecided. Someone told me Clinton did not win in Detroit, but I have no clue if that is true or not.

(in reply to PlayfulOne)
Profile   Post #: 23
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Clinton and Obama disagree on Florida, Michigan revote Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063