gypsysoul
Posts: 70
Joined: 7/4/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: girl4you2 what kind of money poured into san francisco in 1906? it's still not in wyoming. loma prieta/oakland isn't in utah. nyc hasn't been relocated to arizona. where do you start and stop? we could all end up on reservations; ironic, that. high, dry and safe. ack! I wasn't thinking moving it to Kansas....just maybe upriver a bit. About 15 years ago I visited Seattle, and it seems like there was some tourist attraction to an underground part of that city. Apparently Seattle flooded a few times, and someone brought in a shitload of topsoil and shifted Seattle up. The United States doesn't have a Gold Card of Epic Proportions; we can't simply restore New Orleans to its original grandeur and then just leave it there. Levees will have to be rebuilt, and not half-assedly repaired. Talking heads in New Orleans and Louisiana in general are bitching about the costs of rebuilding the city, and not just in terms of rebuilding buildings, but in terms of fixing problems the region suffered before Katrina. To hear the mayor of NO and the governor of LA talk, they have some major issues economically that they want the federal government to correct along with Katrina damage. If New Orleans isn't viable, can't pay its own way, with all of its international seaport commerce, then maybe we can't afford as a nation to spend a couple hundred billion here to rebuild, and a few hundred billion there to revitalize, a city that after a few hundred years still can't pay its own way. Culture is lovely; I'm in favor of it. But it's welfare. We can't have Iraq, tax cuts, and New Orleans, too. It's sad, but where the hell does everyone think the money will come from to fix New Orleans and keep it there?
|