.TheKewlCrew.

.TheKewlCrew. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

RCdc -> .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 10:06:28 AM)
So as not to hijack a thread of HERE. Posters responded but there was a significant amount who refused to answer - stating they couldn't because it broke TOS. For the record - quote: Subjects which are unacceptable regardless of circumstance include, but are not limited to - minors, bestiality, incest, necrophilia, snuff and criminal activities. Any other questions of acceptability will be determined based on the content of the given essay. Now really, apart from maybe one of those - coz I am sure Lazerus could consent - (minus the criminal activities which varies between states and countries - so ignoring that point) - is it just 'cool' and the 'in thing' to say your weirdest kink is one of those? </sarcasm> I'm thinking I must be the weirdest and uncoolest of all - which rocks.[;)] the.dark.

GreedyTop -> RE: .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 10:10:29 AM)
you may be the wierdest, but you're gorgeous, and can get away with it gropelick

DesFIP -> RE: .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 10:11:20 AM)
I don't think admitting to any of those activities would make someone cool. Dangerous, yes. Or have I misunderstood your post?

domahpet -> RE: .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 10:15:59 AM)
back together ill come by? actually, one of the things i fantasize about really disgusts me. as well as being illegel in every state. only one other person knows about it. it aint cool at all.

ownedgirlie -> RE: .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 10:16:39 AM)
You're cool no matter what you love to do. I didn't respond to that thread intentionally. I don't really are about coolness or uncoolness. But there are reasons those TOS exist and it's because people ARE into those things and the Powers of CollarChat don't want them discussed here.

faerytattoodgirl -> RE: .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 10:18:00 AM)
i am the wierdest kink

Stephann -> RE: .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 10:28:24 AM)
I think this topic tugs at the edges of the TOS, and might not last long. Simply because an activity is illegal or unacceptable doesn't mean there's something wrong with liking it. Feelings, inherently, aren't evil or wrong; actions are. If I telll my slave to soak in an ice bath, and hold still when I'm having sex with her, I might very well be doing something that people don't care for; but in no way am I breaking any laws. My question, is why you care if you or anyone else looks cool or not? Liking what you like doesn't affect any sort of kewlness. Stephan

junecleaver -> RE: .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 10:43:04 AM)
I didn't respond to the post, because I had nothing to say on the matter. Fantasies can be very personal and since they are in your head, it feels safer to go to extreme places because 'it's not like you'd ever really do it.' So it's quite possible their fantasies are a violation of TOS. There are probably more people into it than you would think---particularly the first two. However, I still think you are probably the weirdest and uncoolest anyway [;)]

camille65 -> RE: .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 10:56:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Stephann I think this topic tugs at the edges of the TOS, and might not last long. Simply because an activity is illegal or unacceptable doesn't mean there's something wrong with liking it. Feelings, inherently, aren't evil or wrong; actions are. If I telll my slave to soak in an ice bath, and hold still when I'm having sex with her, I might very well be doing something that people don't care for; but in no way am I breaking any laws. My question, is why you care if you or anyone else looks cool or not? Liking what you like doesn't affect any sort of kewlness. Stephan Ditto. Somehow I don't think I'm 'kewl' nor is my fantasy (point word, fantasy meaning not in the realm of reality) 'kewl'. I'm not sure if I really understand your question. Is the problem that some answered? Or that some answered by saying they couldn't answer? Or that we don't want to break TOS? [8\|]

SinergyNstrumpet -> RE: .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 11:07:31 AM)
quote: is it just 'cool' and the 'in thing' to say your weirdest kink is one of those? Not to me, I did not answer because I am just not that wierd....according to CM standards.. now according to my best friend and my sister, I am a freak of nature because I like to be clamped, beaten, and face slapped... which is only enhanced by a blindfold and being restrained... pretty garden variety kink. julia

FRSguy -> RE: .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 11:36:14 AM)
My fantasies are just that fantasies and are not intended to come true... I would hate to throw something totaly fictional out there and have someone else pick up on it and say hey thats hot and try to do those things... They are fantasies because the responsible thing to do is not do them.

SteelofUtah -> RE: .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 11:48:18 AM)
See the dark little things we often fantasize about are supposed to remain fantasies. Once experienced they rarely live up to the hype or the completely live up to the hype and you become a slave to the activity and it becomes more unhealthy more like an addiction. Personally I liked My answer, Sure it was Illegal what I am into depending on which side of the Mason/Dixon line you are standing on but trust me there is a reason it is a Fantasy and not something I seek out. I am curious about some of the things that are mentioned as being unacceptable discussion in the TOS however I believe it will always remain a roaming curiosity cause I can't see myself actually following thorugh on any of them, Steel

RCdc -> RE: .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 12:27:57 PM)
Y'all rock - please don't stop answering, but all who have sofar - thankies. Oh and Stephenn - definately 'care' - else I wouldn't ask. I 'care' because I am asking a question, that is why we (generic) post, to get opinions from others or make points with our thoughts. Because we all 'care' one way or another. Otherwise why both coming here? But then that is another post altogether and as I am in a postie mood - I might just [;)] the.dark.

Justme696 -> RE: .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 12:33:47 PM)
I saw a text on a t-shirt...which...mmm....is far from funny "Is it pedophelia when they are dead" Not sure..but there seem hardly any limits anymore in ill things. Sure not cool.

LuckyAlbatross -> RE: .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 5:27:33 PM)
For some people yeah. I used to get accused of it a lot- that I'd get into the types of relationships I did just to try and "top my last one" and that I was just into those things for the attention. What are you going to do? I've had those desires since before I was masturbating, before I even understood what "sex" really was. I think it's ridiculous that some are considered more hot/edgy than others to start with. One persons edge is another persons snore. Considering how boring I generally am, I don't think it really matters much.

Lumus -> RE: .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 5:29:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross Considering how boring I generally am, I don't think it really matters much. You're not boring to me. [8D] Deal with it.

catize -> RE: .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 6:41:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Darcyandthedark So as not to hijack a thread of HERE. Posters responded but there was a significant amount who refused to answer - stating they couldn't because it broke TOS. For the record - quote: Subjects which are unacceptable regardless of circumstance include, but are not limited to - minors, bestiality, incest, necrophilia, snuff and criminal activities. Any other questions of acceptability will be determined based on the content of the given essay. Now really, apart from maybe one of those - coz I am sure Lazerus could consent - (minus the criminal activities which varies between states and countries - so ignoring that point) - is it just 'cool' and the 'in thing' to say your weirdest kink is one of those? </sarcasm> I'm thinking I must be the weirdest and uncoolest of all - which rocks.[;)] the.dark. If a fantasy involves harm to those unable to consent, my concern is about the person who moves to the realm of reality because the fantasy no longer satisfies. I am very careful who I would share certain of my own perverse thoughts because I don’t want anyone to assume I’d really do ‘that’. A few years ago on another site a man shared such a fantasy on the forum; it was clear (to me, anyway) that he was struggling not to act on it in real life. Yeah, I know, he is ultimately responsible for his own actions, but for some the line blurs too easily. I don’t care to assist with that in any way.

Leatherist -> RE: .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 7:02:50 PM)
What was asked about were fantasies. And we can have those without needing to DO them.

SinergyNstrumpet -> RE: .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 7:08:26 PM)
quote: If a fantasy involves harm to those unable to consent, my concern is about the person who moves to the realm of reality because the fantasy no longer satisfies. I am very careful who I would share certain of my own perverse thoughts because I don’t want anyone to assume I’d really do ‘that’. A few years ago on another site a man shared such a fantasy on the forum; it was clear (to me, anyway) that he was struggling not to act on it in real life. Yeah, I know, he is ultimately responsible for his own actions, but for some the line blurs too easily. I don’t care to assist with that in any way. I am sure that separating the lines between reality and fantasy are troubling for many, but most people have sexual fantasies that they never intend to act out... which is why they call it "fantasy". Just because someone has a fantasy that is not "legal" or "consensual" doesn't mean they will feel compelled to act on it. julia

madshysoul -> RE: .TheKewlCrew. (3/17/2008 7:30:35 PM)
Do I have fantasies that violate ToS? Sure. Sometimes they even violate law, gravity, physics, common sense and heisenburg's uncertainty principle. ... That's why they're fantasies. It's really not a matter of 'cool' or 'uncool'... it just is.

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875