leadership527 -> RE: is there a difference (6/23/2009 8:45:22 AM)
|
Well, since I was just doing this research anyway, I'll make a response. Before I start, these are the etymological roots and definitions of words and should not be construed to mean that YOU ought or ought not to agree with them. And it is absolutely true that in kinkland, the definitions have been warped all over the map to a state of uselessness. A slave is a human which is owned by another human. So if you have an ownership dynamic, then it is M/s. Otherwise, it is something else (D/s presumably?) Ownership does not imply any concept that even remotely equates to "total power exchange". As far back as we have recorded history, humans have owned other humans. But the range of social contracts governing that behavior is ALL over the map. Depending on what culture and time period you are looking at, there are a ton of variables. One scholar, Moses Finley, suggested the following set of criteria to discuss the degree of enslavement: - right to own property - authority over the work of another - power of punishment over another - legal rights and duties (liability to arrest and/or arbitrary punishment, or to litigate) - familial rights and privileges (marriage, inheritance, etc.) - possibility of social mobility (manumission or emancipation, access to citizen rights) - religious rights and obligations military rights and obligations (military service as servant, heavy or light soldier, or sailor) This is meant to be a little background on the topic not meant to describe how any particular individual or, for that matter, the general population of BDSM'ers think of these concepts. As a fascinating [to me] aside, vanilla marriage institutions in the united states anywhere before 1970 or so contain a great many of these attributes and one might reasonably consider the social status of "wife" to be a type of slavery (big surprise there, eh *laughs*). I personally like to trot that one out when I get someone all up in arms about WIITWD. I'm a lot more affronted by the legally enforcable social institutions of marriage pre-70's than I am the most stringent forms of consensual slavery today.
|
|
|
|