RE: Labels: S-types and D-Types

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Labels: S-types and D-Types

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Labels: S-types and D-Types

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Labels: S-types and D-Types - 10/3/2005 6:52:44 AM

night101owl

Posts: 83
Joined: 8/15/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: happypervert
I don't see the point of this. It is nothing more than using a different term for the commonly understood terms of dominant and submissive and this is implied in the names of the types.

I think it makes a very important point in breaking down D/s and SM, in recognizing that there are dominant masochists and submissive sadists, and the full spectrum of diversity within BDSM. It might also help to break people of the habit of thinking there is "one true way" of doing this.

(in reply to happypervert)