Missokyst
Posts: 6041
Joined: 9/9/2006 Status: offline
|
I have to admit I don't get it. I don't see a thing wrong with being nilla if that is who you are. Traditional households where one party is in charge, is still the way things are in most of the world, and it has worked for centuries. My own parents were very traditional, until the rebellion. It may have been submission in the most religious sense of a wife cleaving unto her husband. There wasn't kink to it, it was just the way things were. Somewhere along the line rebellion became the norm, and living in that traditional way became a slap in the face of personal freedom and womens rights. But it is still normal to see people who believe that one person should be in charge, most often men over women. It works. What does make domination and submission what it is, if it isn't nilla? What is so wrong about being vanilla if you are happy without the kinky aspect? Kyst
< Message edited by Missokyst -- 3/26/2008 8:10:07 PM >
_____________________________
pain is the breaking of the shell that encloses your understanding ~Gibran, Kahlil “The truth is, everyone is going to hurt you. You just got to find the ones worth suffering for.” ― Bob Marley
|