RE: Smaller male subs

RE: Smaller male subs (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress

Message

MistressDolly -> RE: Smaller male subs (3/31/2008 10:06:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Ladylocks Do any other mistresses on this site other than me prefer their male subs shorter or smaller than themselves? My Dainty is only 5' 4 and I am 5' 9. I like the fact that even when he is in heels and I am barefoot he has to look up to me. It gives me a feeling of strength to look down apon him. I enjoy the fact that he is smaller when I cradle him in my arms or when I put him over my knee. It seems more natural to dominate him being smaller especially feminizing or diapering him than if he was alot bigger. One of the rules of our relationship is that he has to submit to any restraints I wish to put on him at any time. I like it when I wrestle him down to the floor to tie him and he can struggle but doesnt get away from me being smaller. Do any other ladies like this? I've spoken to a couple male subs who love to be trampled, smothered and made fun of by Amazonian Women. They love to be called "specs" too. :)

Araven -> RE: Smaller male subs (3/31/2008 10:12:52 AM)
I am what I like to call a "petite" guy, standing around 5'4 while my Mistress stands over me. She prefers and loves me the way that I am, that I am smaller than her and she could "break me" if she so choose to do so or the situtation called for it. And I have to admit, Im learning to love being a small guy when most of my life I always resented it and wished I was taller , but sometimes genetics just deals you the hand it deals you. Each and every day though, I feel more and more special about who I am, and am full of much more self confidence by being with somebody who absolutely loves small thin men.

DiurnalVampire -> RE: Smaller male subs (3/31/2008 10:24:06 AM)
At 5'4, im a tad bit vertically challenged. Fox is 5'7, Angel is 6'3. Most of my boys have been in the 6'3-6'6 range. I dont like big, masculine boys.. mine are defiantely petite. Angel is very thin, all arms and legs and wonderfully tiny. Fox fits nicely in my lap. The Mommy Domme in me is capable of babying Angel no matter how big he is physically. When we are laying together, I can still easily overpower both of them. DV

hardbodysub -> RE: Smaller male subs (3/31/2008 10:47:54 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MistressDolly quote: ORIGINAL: Ladylocks Do any other mistresses on this site other than me prefer their male subs shorter or smaller than themselves? My Dainty is only 5' 4 and I am 5' 9. I like the fact that even when he is in heels and I am barefoot he has to look up to me. It gives me a feeling of strength to look down apon him. I enjoy the fact that he is smaller when I cradle him in my arms or when I put him over my knee. It seems more natural to dominate him being smaller especially feminizing or diapering him than if he was alot bigger. One of the rules of our relationship is that he has to submit to any restraints I wish to put on him at any time. I like it when I wrestle him down to the floor to tie him and he can struggle but doesnt get away from me being smaller. Do any other ladies like this? I've spoken to a couple male subs who love to be trampled, smothered and made fun of by Amazonian Women. They love to be called "specs" too. :) I love the idea of being physically dominated by a woman, to the point where I couldn't stop her even if I tried. So a larger, stronger woman is very exciting (picture Goddess Severa here). On the other hand, being dominated by a smaller woman is extremely exciting also, particularly if she is able to maneuver me into a situation where, again, I couldn't resist physically even if I wanted to. The fact that she can do so in spite of my size advantage adds a little spice to the situation. Either way, stronger larger woman, or smaller woman, being physically dominated has a touch of humiliation that I find very exciting and arousing.

AtlantaMistress -> RE: Smaller male subs (3/31/2008 11:56:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: darchChylde AtlantaMistress mentioned wrestling, "I still wrestle my boys sometimes...but they know better than to try to really win!" This, i just don't get. i don't see the point of anything 'competitive' without putting some kind of honest effort. When i imagine myself wrestling with Ma'am, there's no holding back beyond being certain i don't hurt Her. She is 6 inches shorter than me and also a BBW (though i hate the term, it sounds like putting a disclaimer on a woman's beauty 'pretty for a big girl'), while i'm not weak; i'm pretty sure we'd be pretty evenly matched and i'd try to 'win'. Of course it would only take one word or look (or knowing myself, a tug of hair) to take all resistance from me. "I KNOW I am in control the minute they are naked and on their knees" Maybe this is the fantasy, but i don't believe so. i like to think that Ma'am KNOWS She is in control at any time, whether i'm naked on my knees or carrying Her groceries. OK - dC - you quoted me, so now I must respond. I was married to a wrestler who was a foot taller and 100lbs heavier.(I'm 5'1". 117lbs). From out playing around (never BDSM - didn't even know about it at the time) I know some moves, but when my boy and I wrestle, he is still much stronger - but loves it, and I know full well he is not putting up as much of a fight as he could, and we have fun! As a Pro, it is about the power exchange, and that is how I always start a session. There is never any doubt who is in control. With brian (my boy) there are certain things (his work, his kid) I will not interfere - he must have control. It goes much more toward the other post "Too Real" - when in real life, you simply cannot always be in control. When a decision must be made, he always deferrs to me - trusting I will make the best decision for US.

darchChylde -> RE: Smaller male subs (3/31/2008 12:11:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AtlantaMistress OK - dC - you quoted me, so now I must respond. I was married to a wrestler who was a foot taller and 100lbs heavier.(I'm 5'1". 117lbs). From out playing around (never BDSM - didn't even know about it at the time) I know some moves, but when my boy and I wrestle, he is still much stronger - but loves it, and I know full well he is not putting up as much of a fight as he could, and we have fun! As a Pro, it is about the power exchange, and that is how I always start a session. There is never any doubt who is in control. With brian (my boy) there are certain things (his work, his kid) I will not interfere - he must have control. It goes much more toward the other post "Too Real" - when in real life, you simply cannot always be in control. When a decision must be made, he always deferrs to me - trusting I will make the best decision for US. Well, i never intended anything i said as an affront to you, merely gave my perspective to your words, but as for your second point i'd like to clarify. Yes, i am in control of most aspects of my life and in reality; i am in control of the Ds portion as well. i could choose to exert that control and take the option of stepping back and away from the relationship. Though to me, it seems like no choice at all (and thus is not real control); in reality it is there and nonetheless true; though far from my mind. When i said that Ma'am is always in control, i mean it in those areas that both She has chosen to have control and that i have agreed to give up control. Now, to this point, She has not made any desire known to exert control in any area that i would not willingly give it. Also, She has not given any orders that i have not been comfortable fulfilling; i'm sure it will happen and when it does it will be a test of my devotion and willingness to submit to Her. i'm not saying that i haven't been tested and given difficult goals that i honestly did not feel i could achieve, but those have been in areas that i recognised that i had trouble with and asked Her for Her help. Back to the OP, i think that with a basic understanding of leverage; once a man is prone, any woman can physically overpower him.

Shawn1066 -> RE: Smaller male subs (3/31/2008 1:25:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DiurnalVampire When we are laying together, I can still easily overpower both of them. DV Quite. I always try my hardest and I can't do anything at all when she wants to hold me down.

Politesub53 -> RE: Smaller male subs (3/31/2008 1:36:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MissMagnolia Yes AtlantaMistress and all the other shorties, it IS true that precious things come in small packages[:D] Should this be on the "penis" thread Ma`am or am i missing something [8D]

DelilahDeb -> RE: Smaller male subs (3/31/2008 3:39:26 PM)
To the original poster's question-- Yes, I enjoy the occasional smaller gent. One lovely sub is just about that 5'4" tp my 5'9" as you, and he's the prettiest of my current partners. Most of my past and present partners are in my size range yet stronger: a smith, a soccer-rugger player, a trucker, a roughneck. I find the question irrelevant, generally. If they're short, I may manhandle by the hair or ears, if they're tall I may manhandle by the balls...really it's just a matter of convenience. And even dom/top friends are happy to accept a serious session from me when it's just massage and nothing else...and that's my contribution to the scene as an occasional "service top". However...I don't even think of the question. I know I can do what I need to do, in vanilla life as in BDSM, and that inner attitude seems to translate into an unquestioning acceptance of my dominance in a scene. Delilah Deb

hairslave -> RE: Smaller male subs (3/31/2008 5:11:58 PM)
as a submisive,... i wish to speak if i may?.... i would love to submit to a short(er) Domme. i am 5'7' but have no porblem with her being shorter then me. When she would want to tower over me, theres always platfoam shoes, a stair, a stole, or,.. She can always order me to kneel (or ) and bow beneath Her. Having to submit to a woman who is shorter then me,.. turns me on. If i can respictfully say so. Tall woman are great thou too. Repictly yours hairslave quote: ORIGINAL: MissMagnolia I'm a shortarse but always in control. It would be hard to find a slave shorter than me anyway, at 5' 2" ( 5' 8" in heels though[:D]).

youngsubgeoff -> RE: Smaller male subs (3/31/2008 6:28:44 PM)
While I would love to be dominated by a bigger and stronger woman, it is unlikely to happen, me being 6' and 245 pounds...

yidproquo -> RE: Smaller male subs (3/31/2008 6:51:24 PM)
And don't forget about the short and stocky/strong guys. Just because we're close to the ground doesn't mean we're scrawny weaklings either. Ah, the myriad of options...

SkinnySlave -> RE: Smaller male subs (4/1/2008 10:46:48 AM)
For the strong, large ladies who enjoy the size contrast, there are many more smaller men who crave the direction of a larger, heavier Domme. Twice my weight (130 lbs.) is always nice, and taller (5'6") is also intoxicating. It's refreshing to see some Women who share this dynamic.

solvr70 -> RE: Smaller male subs (4/1/2008 12:31:56 PM)
not sure if 5'7" with an avg build classifies me as small or not. there are different excitements that come from both a Domme that is shorter and taller then myself.

ShaktiSama -> RE: Smaller male subs (4/1/2008 2:35:14 PM)
I have not every been with a man under 5'7" or so, but I do not have trouble finding men less physically strong or massive than I am. So long as they like to be thrown over my knee and spanked hard or held down between my thighs, it's all good...

Reigna -> RE: Smaller male subs (4/1/2008 7:57:53 PM)
I'm tall and Amazon-proportioned; most people are smaller than I am. That said, I have a marked but not absolute preference for subs who are a bit smaller than I am, and I like a wiry body. My sub--who likes to wear fishnets, high heels, and a blonde wig--was a professional athlete in his youth, and still is in fine shape. I'm fairly athletic, but no match for someone who once earned a living on the playing field. One day when we were horsing around, he pinned me down. I wriggled into position to slip my hand between his legs, got a firm hold of his balls, and gave him what I hope was a thousand-megawatt grin. That was the end of that.

KindLadyGrey -> RE: Smaller male subs (4/2/2008 11:48:19 PM)
I always thought I had a very strong preference for the bigger boys, but then this tiny little fragile thing walked into my life with a nervous smile and I've been hooked on the doll ever since. I do love the way I can manhandle him, and I love the way he is actually afraid of me sometimes because he KNOWS I can kick his ass at any time. I think he knows I'd never really hurt him, but the clear physical power distinction does add spice to the power exchange. I also think darch has a point. In any fight every dominant woman always has a "the subbie boy loses" card that she can play at any time. Generally speaking, a tug on the hair and a deep deep kiss turns them into Jello and I win. Period. No matter how big they are.

HardToTame -> RE: Smaller male subs (4/3/2008 4:24:15 AM)
This interests me. It's always the mental aspect I think that truly, dominates a sub. But then again, not even so much the dominance, more the seduction. When you seduce someone you kind of, trick them in a way into doing what you please. It's kind of, an indirect order. A bit like, giving the dog the treat BEFORE he obeys the command, or tempting him with it. It's a sub having the dominance in REALITY that makes the whole scenario a FANTASY. And thats what it is, because in real life, if a person off the street becomes violent to you you wouldn't sit there and say "wow do it again", you fight back or attempt to restrain the attacker. Even smaller men, if well trained can take on people who are quite sizeable to them. So I don't think it SHOULD matter and infact in my eyes thats an aspect that seperates the QUALITY of a mistress. If theres a mistress who is so small I can snap her, yet she is so unbelievably seductive that she can control me to her every whim, then, I'd rather be her slave than a girl who towers over me but has no creative control whom, commands an order but has no REAL authority because she's failed to capture me via her, powers of seduction so to say. I know that might make me sound like someone who is just into sex with whips, but, what I'm trying to say is, that I guess theres more ways to dominate and exert that dominance that goes beyond agression, and with out those other methods, size means nothing. Because it's a fantasy, to me, it's all about projecting creativity.

SweetDommes -> RE: Smaller male subs (4/3/2008 6:58:09 AM)
I refuse to have to 'woman-handle' our boy(s), but at the same time, there is a lot of appeal to being able to, just like there is appeal to having a boy who is much larger/stronger than I am kneeling at my feet because he adores me. As I said before, I just like them all, no matter the stature [:D] [;)]

MadameMarque -> RE: Smaller male subs (4/3/2008 7:58:45 AM)
I have an appreciation for both height ranges. In either case, I prefer a certain androgynous appeal. Bishounen is the Japanese word. A very beautiful, sexy, and petite man and my devastating attraction to him, solidified my near fetish for smaller men. Whether slender and graceful or compact and tight, in build. However, I cannot forget or neglect the appeal, fine beauty, and raw sexuality of certain tall men. And, tall men need not be hairy and butch. Tall men can be bishounen, too - thank the Gods! I'm usually attracted to those who are either taller - 6' or over - or smaller built than I (just under 5'7"). But, to be sure, it's the individual person that attracts me, never strictly their size.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875