FLButtSlut
Posts: 344
Joined: 3/17/2005 Status: offline
|
In so many ways, being "collared" and being "married" are similar. It seems to me that the symbols though are quite different. nephandi, I agree that as you collect them and purchase them yourself, of course they are yours. But I would ask, did your master give you one when he initially collared you, and do you view that one differently? Emerald, I agree with you that it seems really tacky to wear a collar that someone else provided when out with another. Although don't you also wonder how that "other" feels about it? Denise and IronBear, Destroying the collar, and especially when done together is rich in the symbolism that the giving of the collar initially represented. This is an area where the two commitments differ greatly. A wedding ring belongs to the finger it was placed on, a collar, to the person who placed it there. If everyone agrees to keep the collar after the relationship ends, then the idea of placing in a "keepsake" box seems most appropriate. One area where things don't seem so different....just like most women would not want to wear the ring that was on a previous spouse's finger, a sub/slave doesn't seem to want to wear a collar that was on another either.
|