FTopinMichigan
Posts: 571
Joined: 7/5/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster Laughing...if you're going to make judgments like that on the basis of an internet list, good luck. Sure there are liars. Liars suck. But you're kidding yourself if you think you can expose liars by comparing their answers to a list somewhere on the internet. Maybe there are some liars contributing to the list? Ever thought of that one? I'm not a shallow, unintelligent person, or an onliner, just FYI. And as I clearly pointed out, in my own post...I always form my own opinion on people. The women on the list...at least the ones I read, are women that I either have known for many years, or have been acquainted with over my active time in the community (not "online"). Many of them have strong reputations and are in good standing in our local community. Some of them, I call my friends. Some have become friends, after getting acquainted from being on the same list. This list isn't for gossip or trashing others, as implied in a few posts, but for sharing information for safety purposes. Are there women making things up on the list? I'm sure some that could be saying things that might benefit them, or from their own perspective, which may be quite skewed, based on their personal interaction that didn't go well, but an intelligent woman can still benefit from the list, based on this particular one, and how it is managed. Your view of it is negative and that it won't work, and I can appreciate that it wouldn't serve you. Glad you got a laugh out of it, but it's not a humorous or slanderous cackle of women just gossiping. It serves a purpose. I tend to see those that oppose it, are more than likely the ones that fear their antics to be exposed. They fear they can't keep their stories straight if telling it to more than one woman. And as said earlier, by someone, if you think women don't share this information, even without a formal list, then I'd be laffin'. And if you don't think MEN share this type of information, I'd be laffin' even harder. The other thing is that it appears some people have interpreted this "list" to be a negative. It also has posts that are very positive, and reflective of the many good experiences that folks have with one another too. [Just an example: "So-in-so is respectful, honorable and <insert good quality here>, but he's not compatible to my desires/needs. I would recommend him as a potential submissive for those sharing his interests." ] "It's a good thing," as Martha said, and I agree. K
|