Kana
Posts: 6676
Joined: 10/24/2006 Status: offline
|
A few thoughts quickly. 1- I never deal out consequences when angry, for me that is a recipe for disaster. 2- I have to look at the basic point of punishment. I don’t punish people because I want to hurt them. If that is the case I just do that because I want to and because I can. I don’t need to put any guilt trips or false consequences in order to do so. 3- For me the point of punishment is behavior modification. That’s it. So going to the original posters question is the consequence unfair, my thoughts are, will it adequately modify her behavior. It may seem a bit harsh to some, but we don’t know the background. I seriously doubt I would lay such a thing out for a first offense, or something minor, but if it was the end result of an escalating series of disobedience, why not? Plus as has been mentioned its one of those things that comes off as really harsh, but if done right may not be so bad. Hell, the punishee may have a piercing fetish for all we know. 4- One thing I do is talk the action through with her, explain what she did wrong and why she is getting the consequence I lay out. Failure to do so, to just give a consequence may lead to misunderstand and erroneous thinking. I want her to see exactly what she did wrong, how I feel about it and why I am doing what I am doing. I also give her a chance for explanations. I hate excuses so that doesn’t fly, but do understand mitigating circumstances. Plus she always has the chance to throw herself on the mercy of the court (yeah, right, snickers, mercy). 5- If she isn’t sure of what happened and how I feel, how can she know to change what she did. Anyhow that’s just my thoughts.
< Message edited by Kana -- 4/22/2008 9:35:29 AM >
|