RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message

happypervert -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 11:27:30 AM)

Akasha has a addressed the femdoms writing mass market ads and then selecting their target market of suckers from the respondents.

A related topic would be those who write an add for a target market but don't get the desired response rate. At least, that's what happens to me and I can speculate on two outcomes from their evaluation of my written presentation:

1. they can see that I'm not what they're looking for
2. they can see that they're not what I'm looking for

Either way I should trust their judgment and if I don't get my desired 100% response rate I know whining won't help.



Kasia -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 11:55:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: realsumissive

I would like to ask a question. How can you be deleting emails from subs asking to visit you when you don't have a profile?

Now isnt that one big and unsolved mistery?

I really blame internet on producing your kind - you dont think anymore, you just click at anything you find clickable. Maybe try clicking a bit more around and you find answer to your question? You never know what you may click on.



KittenWithaTwist -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 12:15:20 PM)

Just to give you a tiny clue, frenchpet: financial domination is *hardly* a career choice. However, sometimes, it is a good way to make a little extra cash. Pro dommes offer services like beatings and humiliation. Some online dommes offer chatting and webcam services. You pay a phone sex operator to entice you.

Do phone sex operators, strippers, and pro dommes make you angry? Why should they? If someone wants to give up their money, so be it. Everyone is entitled to do so. I don't see why that should make anyone angry at all.



UtopianRanger -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 12:20:13 PM)

Akasha....

I also think your theory is sound and always enjoy reading your well-thought-out posts.

I wish to tell you tho.... My experiences with the Women on Collarme have been nothing short of wonderful. Even the one-liners I receive are always fun and pleasant.

Sure.... I will admitt that in the first two months I was blasted with messages from all the money-girls, but since then, they haven’t bothered me. I think they hit everyone up in the beginning!


Sitting here smiling, not bitchen' - LOL!





- The Ranger





Kasia -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 12:50:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: UtopianRanger

My experiences with the Women on Collarme have been nothing short of wonderful. Even the one-liners I receive are always fun and pleasant.



Since you dont look for 20 yo Barbie-types and have inteligent and well written profile, its no wonder.



realsumissive -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 1:22:17 PM)

so, you hve no answer for the question either. Interesting.



Kasia -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 1:35:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: realsumissive

so, you hve no answer for the question either. Interesting.

Since you are so smart not to find the answer yourself, I will give you a hint - its in my signature. Just go on clicking a bit lower.



realsumissive -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 1:45:02 PM)

Thanks, but I don't need the hint. I'm really not interested in any domme that uses a deleted profile, even if it is on the message boards. There seems to be many threads on these sites about deceiving people. I wonder if dommes using a profile that can't be seen can be catagorized as deceptive?



AAkasha -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 1:49:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: realsumissive

Thanks, but I don't need the hint. I'm really not interested in any domme that uses a deleted profile, even if it is on the message boards. There seems to be many threads on these sites about deceiving people. I wonder if dommes using a profile that can't be seen can be catagorized as deceptive?


There's no obligation for someone to have a profile available to post here on the forums. Some purposely don't want one because they don't want the emails, and some make it more difficult to find to avoid getting email from people who email any femdom they see posting.

It's not deception at all. Why does posting here mean a femdom has to make her personal information and email address available to you and anyone else?

Akasha



Leonidas -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 1:56:13 PM)

I have an alternative theory (well, two really).

The first theory is that Collarme is a front for the CIA. They put up hundreds of lascivious profiles with sexy pictures because they think that perverts are actually aliens that escaped from Area 51, and they want to keep track of them. The reason that mail never gets replied to is because they don't actually read it, they just run it through a cryptologic machine to see if it contains any secret alien codes.

My second theory is that if people aren't interested they just don't bother to reply, because, well, they aren't interested.

I'm still trying to decide which theory is more plausible.



Kasia -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 2:07:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: realsumissive

Thanks, but I don't need the hint. I'm really not interested in any domme that uses a deleted profile, even if it is on the message boards. There seems to be many threads on these sites about deceiving people. I wonder if dommes using a profile that can't be seen can be catagorized as deceptive?

Now I am not sure if you are just plain stupid or pulling my leg?!? Or purposely trying to provoke to get attention?
Whatever may be I find it really insolent and offensive to
a) assume I dont have a profile
b) assume I have deleted profile
c) and most important proclaim me to be deceptive

I hope moderators will solve this - I am not commenting your rudeness anymore.



realsumissive -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 2:13:19 PM)

When I click on your name attached to your messages, I get, "Profile Not Found". I'm assuming nothing. If you have an active profile on here, why not use it to post? Excuse me for having an opinion, but I think you are hiding something, or are being deceptive, and with all the threads going on about deceipt, I believe there are many that would agree.



Kasia -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 2:24:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

There's no obligation for someone to have a profile available to post here on the forums.

The thing is, Aakasha, I do have profile, and I took quite amount of trouble of writing and explaining in it.
I first registered at the site and when I tried to login in message boards with my nickname it kept telling me "user not found". And when I tried to register again it told me "username taken".
Didnt want to write endless complaining mails to the staff so I registered to the forum with one S less.
In fact there is link and explanation in my sig line.

I just dont feel like explaining all that again and again to any hasty superficial simpleton around here.



KCMOLucky -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 2:31:55 PM)

Are you a COMPLETE moron?? The reason Kassia doesn't have a link to her profile on collarme is because somewhere, for some reason, there's an "S" missing in her name on here. It's not like she's hidden that fact; as she's said. It's in her signature.

I'm not going to even attempt to explain it to you, because I don't think you're capable of understanding. Suffice to say it has to do with web design, and code.

You're wrong, and you look like an idiot. Congratulations.



caitlyn -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 2:32:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: realsumissive

When I click on your name attached to your messages, I get, "Profile Not Found". I'm assuming nothing. If you have an active profile on here, why not use it to post? Excuse me for having an opinion, but I think you are hiding something, or are being deceptive, and with all the threads going on about deceipt, I believe there are many that would agree.


Without wishing to become involved in matters that are not mine, I would like to make the small observation that you may or may not be making a very good impression in your first 20+ posts here. [;)]

I don't think it is that hard to figure out why she is Kasia here, and Kassia over there ... ok, so it's not hard for people that have been here longer than 27 posts. [:D]



realsumissive -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 2:36:09 PM)

If you read back to my original question to her, it was just that. If I am not making a good impression by asking a question I would have liked a civil answer to, then I'm in trouble. Doe the fact that she was rude, overbearing, and meanspirited say that she won't be respected either? read her reply to me. Had she written a tenth of the explaination to me that she gave Akasia, I would have said thank you Mistress, and I hope it doesn't cause too much angst. There was no need for her rudeness.



caitlyn -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 2:40:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Leonidas

My second theory is that if people aren't interested they just don't bother to reply, because, well, they aren't interested.


I know someone that makes fake profiles complete with pictures of hottie-bodies in slinky outfits, just to get joke material about online people to use at the local munch.

Having done the math, I'm thinking 72.385% of online fakes, are bored old munch-farts. [;)]



JohnWarren -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 2:47:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha
It's not deception at all. Why does posting here mean a femdom has to make her personal information and email address available to you and anyone else?

Akasha


There seems to be a misconception that everyone on CollarMe is looking for a partner... at least among those who seem to be desperately looking for one.

Some of us are here to help and chat. The fact that Akasha is an incredibly attractive dominant doesn't put any obligation on her to be available to anyone.

I do wonder how anyone could think that attacking a woman here on the boards makes him more attractive to other women who might actually be looking for potential partners.



realsumissive -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 2:49:13 PM)

caitlyn,

It's good to know i don't fall into that catagory. i don't go to munches. You have a delightful sense of humor, and I appreciate your comment on my other post.



caitlyn -> RE: A new theory on people not responding to emails (10/14/2005 2:53:33 PM)

No worries ... I get myself in trouble all the time on here.

Can't really figure out why but I'm thinking:

a) People are too sensitive ...
b) I post while doing my pre-date drinking ...
c) both a) & b) ...
d) I'm just generally a fuck-up. [;)]



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875