RE: Female Supremacy?

RE: Female Supremacy? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

WelshGuyUk -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 3:19:07 PM)
quote: So all in all we are all the same. Wickad encase you didn't read the whole post i pretty much summed up everyone is equal, as I was using a scientific well known fact that men can have female minds and females can have male minds, when i use the term male and female, i am not on about their body i am on about the mind the outershell is completely un-important but your not seeing it like i am. In other words to sum up again females (with male minds) would probably not find school handy for them and females with female minds would prefer school, and males with female minds would prefer school method to males with male minds! The outshell is completely irrelevant. I know I have a male mind I had a test to find out, and I didn't find school the best way to learn and it also a well documented thing by science that the trend of people with male minds do not do well at school to people with female minds. I ain't talking from nothing I am simply telling you what has been researched. So - no there was no "tone" in my voice that you heard. I'm sorry you read in such the wrong way. Inferiorxy - surely if you say we are mutated from females, you could argue because we are mutated from you , you could see it as we are an evolved human from the female. Which would make us superior ! Evolution never goes backwards hehe [;)]

impossiblesub -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 3:20:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Inferiorxy To understand how and why Females in any mammal species are superior, simply ask yourself this: why are we males born with nipples? Look at the chromosomes. XX vs. Xy makes it pretty obvious. Females are superior because they represent the entire human being. The male is inferior because he is, from a very real genetic standpoint, an incomplete copy of a female. He is a derivative, subhuman mutation, designed for sexual reproduction. After providing sperm, he's quite disposable, and our society shows this in many ways. LOL, you could just turn that around and say females are missing the most important chromosome - the Y chromosome.

MISTRESSKUMA -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 3:23:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RumpusParable Actually, if we're going to go there haha, the male genital composition is an example of what you were contradicting. Females have fully differentiated genitals whereas the male does not, in addition to the penis being variation by the Y chromosome of the X chromosomes primary physical design. It's why male children are genetically more their mothers and female children are genetically equally their mother and father. ;) ---- As to the actual topic lol, Yes, I definitely feel that what another of the females commented on above, that the OP's posts here (and other places) are laced with misogyny despite saying they do not have any issue with females. It would be best for you to take a look at that, ImpossibleSub. Hehe, well I just love the fact that mother nature gave us women an organ whose only purpose is for sheer pleasure. teehee, yipee.[;)] clitty cat, me.

WelshGuyUk -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 3:24:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: impossiblesub quote: ORIGINAL: Inferiorxy To understand how and why Females in any mammal species are superior, simply ask yourself this: why are we males born with nipples? Look at the chromosomes. XX vs. Xy makes it pretty obvious. Females are superior because they represent the entire human being. The male is inferior because he is, from a very real genetic standpoint, an incomplete copy of a female. He is a derivative, subhuman mutation, designed for sexual reproduction. After providing sperm, he's quite disposable, and our society shows this in many ways. LOL, you could just turn that around and say females are missing the most important chromosome - the Y chromosome. As a man i'd rather X and y ....... best of both worlds! :) We are ALL forgetting the people who are male and female at same time...is this a genetic error or the next evolutionary step....who knows.

MISTRESSKUMA -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 3:24:37 PM)
actually the poor Y is missing its leg.[:(]

WelshGuyUk -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 3:27:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MISTRESSKUMA actually the poor Y is missing its leg.[:(] Wait, men have 3 legs though only the 3rd one can magically change its size, so it makes complete sense ! hehe

MISTRESSKUMA -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 3:28:52 PM)
actually, your better off with double dose of the X chromosome.[:(]

impossiblesub -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 3:29:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: chamberqueen You made a good point - women are not genetically superior to men, though neither are they inferior. However, you missed the point when you said that an Alpha male will never surrender to the Alpha female. This is where the mind comes in. There are times when it is good to stop being the tough guy who is always in charge and needs to handle the minutest of life's quote: ORIGINAL: MladyHathor [:@] When people throw around generalist statements, it just chaps My bootie----first of all a remark about the alpha male NEVER submitting is crap--its done all the time when needs finances, family situations or CHOICE warrants it. Good point - I may be incorrect with that assumption. I suppose it depends upon how you look at things. There are many Alpha males in prison who have never submitted to anyone or anything and that is precisely why they are in prison, although how that matter relates is speculative. I was unclear I suppose in that I was looking at things as related to society as a whole, and not just a 2 person relationship. We all come into contact with others during our daily life and in some of those cases we are the dominant one in the relationship and in some we are submissive.

TheChastiser -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 3:36:32 PM)
the answer is simple, its an oxymoron. Mike

ShaktiSama -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 3:48:08 PM)
sighs, rolls over to glance at another thread created to propound patriarchist ideology in the guise of a discussion of Female Supremacy, rolls her eyes in disgust Is it that time of month again, where we all line up to spew some pseudoscience to reaffirm an absurdly arbitrary sexist status quo? Sorry, but the final proof of the superiority of the female is that this message board can have an entire forum devoted to Male Supremacist ideology without women feeling the need to bash it on a daily basis...and yet we can't go more than a fortnight without another one of these threads that exist to bash the female version of the same shite before it even gets equal time for derision. [:'(] Are we all scared much by the idea of sociopolitical role reversal, d'ya think? Female Supremacy is a BDSM sexual fantasy, folks. Not a real sociopolitical movement. The fantasy exists for the pleasure of certain dominant women and certain submissive men who enjoy sexist humiliation. There is ZERO intent on anyone's part to make this fantasy a living reality for non-consenting individuals. The rhetoric of Female Supremacy is a parody of the rhetoric of male supremacy or racial supremacy. It has no meaning outside the pleasure it gives those who choose to play the game. This game is repugnant to some, but so are many other games which touch on sensitive social or political issues, like ageplay and raceplay. In short, until Barbarella and her minions arrive at your door to hustle you off to the Man Farm so that you can spend the rest of your life attached to a man-milking machine? I'd strongly suggest y'all stop worrying about it. [;)]

impossiblesub -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 3:49:10 PM)
This may be of interest, and does indeed point to the possibility of such a society in existence. One must bear in mind that this society evolved in a closed environment where there was no need to defend against attackers and there was an abundance of food. Of course changing a whole species is another matter. http://songweaver.com/info/bonobos.html

Level -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 3:50:38 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: impossiblesub Someone emailed me this answer: Female supremacy is pretty much the exact OPPOSITE of mainstream society. The theory is that women are higher in stamina and intelligence, but more emotionally driven, while men are more logic-driven, and our logic has led us to more wars. Hopefully someone will send an email detailing how supremacy of either gender is wank fodder. [:D]

MladyHathor -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 3:57:15 PM)
quote: There are many Alpha males in prison who have never submitted to anyone or anything and that is precisely why they are in prison actually, again a generalist statement---they submitted to something--drugs, immorality, greed--something and by the way in prison--oh yeah they submit, most of them becomes someone's bitch-that's how they stay alive.

tigerstyle -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 4:08:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ShaktiSama patriarchist ideology BDSM is the last refuge thereof.

Misstoyou -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 4:59:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ShaktiSama ... Sorry, but the final proof of the superiority of the female is that this message board can have an entire forum devoted to Male Supremacist ideology without women feeling the need to bash it on a daily basis...and yet we can't go more than a fortnight without another one of these threads that exist to bash the female version of the same shite before it even gets equal time for derision. [:'(] Just wanted to repeat this...

Wickad -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 6:17:12 PM)
Greetings WelshGuyUk, Please read my post again ... at the very top of it are the words "Fast Reply". This means that I was not responding to you but rather using the 'Fast Reply' option on this system. In fact, I specifically addressed my first comment to the "Original Poster" (OP). Frankly, I really have no idea what you are talking about as far as 'tone' is concerned. I wasn't addressing you. Wickad

impossiblesub -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 6:43:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MladyHathor quote: There are many Alpha males in prison who have never submitted to anyone or anything and that is precisely why they are in prison actually, again a generalist statement---they submitted to something--drugs, immorality, greed--something and by the way in prison--oh yeah they submit, most of them becomes someone's bitch-that's how they stay alive. Perhaps some of them submitted to drugs or peer pressure. Greed comes into play as a desire for that which can buy what we desire in society or give us power so they are expressing social dominance by not submitting to societal laws and the established structure of aquiring wealth. One cannot submit to immorality if they have no morality to begin with, your logic is flawed there. They do not all become someones bitch and some actually run the prison, again dominance. I would not consider forced submission to be true and complete submission.

impossiblesub -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 6:48:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ShaktiSama sighs, rolls over to glance at another thread created to propound patriarchist ideology in the guise of a discussion of Female Supremacy, rolls her eyes in disgust Are you sure? Or is this just your perception? Perhaps the opposite is true or perhaps it is a legimate discussion.

ShaktiSama -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 7:50:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: impossiblesub I seem to be not quite understanding the entire concept of female supremacy. It is obvious from a purely genetic standpoint that not all females are superior to all other males. It is also obvious that The Alpha male will never surrender to The Alpha female unless he is inferior in which case he could most likely not hold the status of Alpha male. It is also obvious that males are more aggressive, less likely to submit, and more likely to challenge the hierarchy due to the fact that they have higher testosterone levels. How is this supposed to work out in society? Am I missing something? Yep. I'm sure. More pseudoscience spewed in the service of patriarchist ideology. Gonna have to do a lot better than this, I'm afraid.

impossiblesub -> RE: Female Supremacy? (4/28/2008 7:56:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ShaktiSama Yep. I'm sure. More pseudoscience spewed in the service of patriarchist ideology. Gonna have to do a lot better than this, I'm afraid. Perhaps I was just incorrect. I suppose you missed all of the posts after my first as you will see I generally support equality.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875