Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Defining actions impacting consent and relationships


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> Defining actions impacting consent and relationships Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Defining actions impacting consent and relationships - 4/29/2008 5:57:17 PM   
burningdesires47


Posts: 120
Joined: 2/22/2007
Status: offline
Consider this a philosophical question, posed as an actual situation that brought forth questions worthy of debate.

Alright, so I have a relatively vanilla primary partner of three years, who may be into the rough sex, a little slap and tickle, and knowledge about kink in general, but has no desire to be part of the larger kink community, or a D/s relationship, and has a preference for very vanilla sex. I am a switch, currently looking to sub to someone, and without any kinky partners. We're polyamorous, which in this instance only actually applies because it means negotiating relationship boundaries is not completely foreign to us.

We come from different backgrounds. White lower-middle class suburban girl who grew up with abusive parents who turned loving later in life (at least toward me, though they still always fight) in a poverty-stricken primarily black school district meets black urban kid who grew up in white prep schools with a single mom for most of it beyond the first few years of life. I'm not 100% sure any of that really matters, but we do communicate differently, as people are wont to do. I'm quick to jump in with my opinion, he's apt to sit and stew and let silence reign until he bursts. What it means is that in an argument, I'm usually cutting him off and he's usually ignoring me (or seeming to). He also has a tendency to try and walk away from an argument, and walking away when I'm talking to you--whether it be on IM or in person--is the quickest way to piss me off and get me totally irrational. It makes me feel as if I and our relationship are not worth their time.

He dotes on me. I have a chronic illness and he tries to take care of me, but it is trying and he sometimes feels I get too used to him waiting on me. Betimes I do, too. He feels I don't respect his opinion. I feel it's difficult to respect someone's opinion when they either don't have one or refuse to share it. I feel he doesn't talk to me and I don't know him. He feels if he's expected to speak, I should direct a specific question at him and pull teeth to get a response that is more than three words. I feel communication is about sharing, and maybe I would know what to ask him about if he simply talked once in a while. He feels like I think he can't do anything right--and he's not entirely wrong on that front. I feel like it's not that difficult to follow directions, and the reason I don't "screw up all the time" is because when he gives me directions on a task he'd like accomplished, I follow them as he directed rather than dismissing them out of hand and either ignoring the task or doing it "wrong." On the other hand, I also think that making a huge scene every time he does something right--which is more often--is even more demeaning than the times I point out the wrong. And he doesn't "see" how often I do things wrong, because when he says so, I simply fix it rather than make a huge whiny deal about it.

So all that being said....

I see ways in which I can change. My behavior, my attitude, my habits, ways that I believe would make him happy, some of which he has expressed. The lack of strife between us, as we plan a future and a wedding and a marriage and a life together, would make me extremely happy. He has ways he can change too, but this isn't about that right now. I'm not blameless in this, and it is only myself I can make choices for.

Whether these behaviors are "my nature," is part of the question. Moreso, even if they are, a part of my nature is to grow and learn, to become a better person. So choosing to change these behaviors isn't entirely out of character for me. Rebelling against pressure that I see as smothering or unwanted authority is also in my nature, and thus the simple fact that he INSIST that I stop doing something, even if *I* want to stop doing it, makes me want to rebel against it, and at best simply refuse to put effort into changing. It's a matter of being told, "you've cut me off while I was speaking again" and me apologizing versus "STOP cutting me off" and me screaming "NO."

I reiterate here: he's not my dom.

But the question becomes: What if I were to become the perfect submissive to him? Do as he asks, apologize and perhaps discipline myself as necessary when I've done something to displease him, put his needs and wants entirely before mine rather than alongside or mine first as is my nature, treat him with the respect due a superior rather than an equal. Cut just short of calling him Sir.

Is that forcing him into a D/s relationship against his will? Without foreknowledge of kink and its common rules of consent, would there even be a question of a "problem" with that decision, given that it could be viewed as simply making my lover happy? WITH such knowledge, does that change the nature of the necessary "discussions" that must be had? One would think that as long as it makes him happy (as presumably me) then it doesn't matter if he consented first or not. But I can't know for certain it WOULD make him happy, and then wouldn't it just be me imposing my will onto him? In which case I lose the model of the perfect submissive, in which case does it still make it D/s? Or is it simply doing as my lover has asked, and extrapolating "I want you to respect me" into what I feel is appropriate, into what I think he feels would be appropriate based on expressed and implied desires?

At what point does following your partner's wishes become D/s? At what point does consent need to be explicit rather than implicit? At what point is making the decision to change my behavior really a decision to become someone other than myself? Where is the line between changing what is mutually seen as a flaw and changing one's whole personality and way of interacting with people?

As I said, philosophical questions, with my own situation given for example. I expect I'll receive replies regarding my own situation, and certainly that's part of my intent. But I also hope to receive replies more in the realm of the theoretical, the grander scheme of relationships and life. Because I put my thoughts out for general speculation just as much as advice that may pertain to me.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Defining actions impacting consent and relationships - 4/29/2008 6:24:46 PM   
SimplyMichael


Posts: 7229
Joined: 1/7/2007
Status: offline
I commend you for working on your relationship but TO ME what makes a D/s relationship work is communication.  Now the form of that communication is going to vary but as long as both sides understand what is going on with the other, not through assumptions but it has been communicated on some level.  Without that, one person or the other is going to be slighted. 

I don't think anyone loves serving in a vacuum, they feed off of something, a smile, a kind word, something that the reciever gives back.  With someone who can't ask, like your partner, you may think you are doing the right thing but may not be and either way he may not feed you in the way you need.

(in reply to burningdesires47)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Defining actions impacting consent and relationships - 4/29/2008 6:40:05 PM   
goodpet


Posts: 458
Joined: 6/8/2005
Status: offline
I agree with S.Michael about this.  It would make a different for sure but would you be happy in the long run if you received nothing back to feed your needs.

Your comment, " ...put his needs and wants entirely before mine.." also make me wonder if that would work for you in the long run also.  Even in a serious strict M/s the slave's needs have to be met also.  after all we are humans (regardless of the online and written fantasy about slave with no needs or limits) we are in relationships and basic relationship needs and wants have to feed both sides..  now granted, as a slave, my needs might seem simple, as Michael pointed out, be it a smile, a "good girl", a just that kind word.. but we need to be valued and acknowledged for our part in the M/s relationship.

I commend you for looking into your self and seeing what you can do..

perhaps you are on the right track but start out slowly. concentrate on one area you can be more accommodating to him.. give that a few weeks and then reassess.

Good luck

(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Defining actions impacting consent and relationships - 4/29/2008 7:17:33 PM   
burningdesires47


Posts: 120
Joined: 2/22/2007
Status: offline
goodpet: I suppose the phrase of putting his wants and needs before mine IS misleading.... as I'd never do it. But to be sure, being more mindful of his wants rather than expecting him to tend to his own wants, doing more to anticipate him rather than making him ask (i.e. the proverbial surprise flowers, rather than having someone say "hunny will you bring me flowers today?")... that sort of thing.

Thank you for your kind response. I'm expecting some flames here and it's good to hear a kind and helpful word so quickly :)

(in reply to goodpet)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Defining actions impacting consent and relationships - 4/29/2008 7:23:34 PM   
burningdesires47


Posts: 120
Joined: 2/22/2007
Status: offline
SimplyMichael: I think my point got lost as it was a long and awkward rumination that lead to this post, and I lost some of my thoughts along the way...

While I use the example of the perfect sub, I don't want a D/s relationship with him, and neither does he. I agree that any relationship is based on good communication, but communication can't happen if I'm always cutting him off mid-sentence, but stopping that involves a whole bunch of behavioral changes and choices that could be viewed by an eye trained in D/s practices as submission. He's not ignorant of BDSM. Just not interested in having it in his day to day life.

The fact that as my actions could be viewed as submission, I would be doing so without the protection of a negotiated contract outlining his responsibilities for such a gift. And even as neither of us want a D/s relationship, where does that line lay in the need for such a contract? Where does my choice to change my behavior become submission?

(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Defining actions impacting consent and relationships - 4/29/2008 7:30:37 PM   
LuckyAlbatross


Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
Putting an an authority dynamic isn't what you need here, you need to respect the dynamic that exists NOW first.  The fact is that sometimes you don't.  Just because he isn't your dom doesn't mean you shouldn't shut yourself up and listen to him, that you shouldn't change your behavior to work better together.  That's not submission- that's forming a relationship with another person to last in the long term. 

Perhaps in your head you've created a situation in which you will only force your behavior and mindset to change if there is a Ds authority dynamic in place.  If that is true, then a vanilla relationship will not work for you. 

_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to burningdesires47)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Defining actions impacting consent and relationships - 4/29/2008 7:54:43 PM   
derfrewop


Posts: 74
Joined: 5/10/2007
From: Vancouver
Status: offline
Can one person in a relationship manipulate another into changing their basic operating methods and personality? Sure, cults do it all the time. Even within a loving relationship its possible.

However, the two most difficult personalities to change are the Contrarian (just because you say so, I wont) and the Taciturn (because they usually became taciturn to avoid manipulation i.e you can't manipulate me if you don't know my thoughts) Since both of these personalities are at their roots based on avoiding being manipulated, trying to manipulate them is extremely difficult and takes a very very long time.

So can you specifically manipulate him by changing your behavior? Probably not. The contrary type of person is, as you know, extremely likely to rebel and usually brings up any reason at all to justify it. Realistically, how long do you think it would be before you bring up in fight how hard you have been trying to change him? His response to finding out that you have been trying to manipulate him is very likely to be extremely negative.

On the other hand, he is much more likely to succeed in changing you. Simply by making absolutely sure that he never makes overt demands and leads by example, you as a contrarian would have nothing to rebel against. Since keeping his thoughts to himself is his trademark, he would likely succeed.

So you can try but you probably won't succeed. But do you really need to? The taciturn types rarely have problems with understanding that people have needs they personally just can't meet. The poly note simply confirms that he is OK with you fulfilling those needs outside. On the other hand, finding somebody who will put up with all the extreme bullshit a contrary person puts out is extremely rare. Finding one who will also hold on loosely is on the order of miraculous. You obviously can talk with him and reach mutual understandings. Keep him and find a way to get your needs met, outside if necessary.


_____________________________

I only flog good girls. I don't reward bad behavior.

(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Defining actions impacting consent and relationships - 4/29/2008 7:56:27 PM   
burningdesires47


Posts: 120
Joined: 2/22/2007
Status: offline
Well put, LA. A sincere thank you for your thoughts.

You may be right, that a vanilla relationship won't work for me. I'm not ready to admit that yet, if ever, and I'm not sure if you're right or not. But it's certainly an aspect I hadn't considered in a long time that would be worth some deep introspection about.

(in reply to LuckyAlbatross)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Defining actions impacting consent and relationships - 4/29/2008 9:26:12 PM   
burningdesires47


Posts: 120
Joined: 2/22/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: derfrewop

Can one person in a relationship manipulate another into changing their basic operating methods and personality? Sure, cults do it all the time. Even within a loving relationship its possible.

Realistically, how long do you think it would be before you bring up in fight how hard you have been trying to change him? His response to finding out that you have been trying to manipulate him is very likely to be extremely negative.

You obviously can talk with him and reach mutual understandings. Keep him and find a way to get your needs met, outside if necessary.



I'm not talking about me manipulating him, or him me. I'm talking about ME manipulating me. I'm talking about ending the never-ending circle of "well I do A because you do B"/"but I do B because you do A." I'm talking about bettering myself, in ways that would make him happy, and some of those ways would directly make me happy while some would only indirectly make me happy.

So, it would never come up in an argument about how I'm trying to change him. Because I'm trying to change ME. Now granted, if I make these changes, if I stop cutting him off mid-sentence and we still can't communicate, then it's a bigger issue. If I start and stop doing all these things, and his behavior doesn't change, wall then he loses all ability to say it's my fault. And if nothing else, if we still fail at that point to communicate effectively and be happy together, then I know I did all I could.

But the biggest issue here is that we CAN'T talk and come to mutual understandings. I am getting my needs met elsewhere--all of them, in fact, besides a roof over my head. And believe me, that's a sticking point too. That I make sure my needs are met before I give a damn about anyone else. But I admit I could be more considerate about it, and THAT is where change needs to be made.

(in reply to derfrewop)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Defining actions impacting consent and relationships - 4/30/2008 7:52:00 AM   
DominantJenny


Posts: 645
Joined: 4/6/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: burningdesires47
I am getting my needs met elsewhere--all of them, in fact, besides a roof over my head. And believe me, that's a sticking point too.


That's not a sticking point, imo, that's a deal breaker. If ALL your needs are being met elsewhere (aside from the financial ones), you aren't doing him any favors by staying with him.

(in reply to burningdesires47)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Defining actions impacting consent and relationships - 4/30/2008 8:07:27 AM   
apiercedkitty


Posts: 569
Joined: 2/22/2007
From: Michigan
Status: offline
As the OP was long and convoluted (and i'm still on muscle relaxers and pain killers:) the sticking point for me is that there seems to be a HUGE lack of communication going on - not a good thing for ANY type of relationship from my pov... and, in my experience, changes that ppl make only last when it's their idea to change - and they're doing for themself. Sort of like an addict recovering - they have to be doing it for themself - not for anyone else or it ain't gonna stick.
And remember, communication is a two way street - it won't make a bit of difference if you change how you communicate if he continues to choose not to communicate. Just my 2 cents, of course.

_____________________________

normal is a setting on a washing machine...

(in reply to burningdesires47)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Defining actions impacting consent and relationships - 4/30/2008 8:11:39 AM   
DominantJenny


Posts: 645
Joined: 4/6/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: burningdesires47
Where does my choice to change my behavior become submission?


Everyone submits sometimes, at work to a boss, in a vanilla relationship, etc. The difference in D/s is that it is a conscious act and that there are expectations on both sides that are (generally) somewhat different. If, in a vanilla relationship, you choose to alter yourself to submit to your partners desires, that's fine. People do it all the time, for all sorts of reasons, from not wanting conflict to religious beliefs to natural urges. (Some of these are, of course, more psychologically healthy than others, but that's a different issue at the moment.) The problem comes in if you expect a reaction from your vanilla partner like the one you would expect from a kinked partner. ANY reaction from your vanilla partner, from highly positive to none at all, is appropriate; he cannot be blamed for not reacting the way you want him to. He cannot be held to D/s standards in any way. All you can do based on his reaction is choose how you will or will not alter your behavior...for example, if you try this whole submitting to his desires thing and it doesn't change the relationship in positive ways, you are free to go back to your previous behavior patterns if you choose. In general, it's best to communicate with your partner, vanilla or kinked. If you tell your partner, okay, I'm going to make these changes to my behavior/personality in hopes that it will be good for our relationship, and your partner says, "okay", then fine, give it a shot, see if it is good for both of you. If your partner says, "No, I don't want you to make those changes.", then further discussion about why he doesn't want you to and what CAN be done with mutual agreement to improve the relationship is necessary. This is how it is supposed to work in a modern, essentially egalitarian relationship.

(in reply to burningdesires47)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Defining actions impacting consent and relationships - 4/30/2008 8:25:33 AM   
mzbehavin


Posts: 253
Joined: 1/15/2008
Status: offline
This is a very interesting thread. Thank you all.

_____________________________

There's never really a good time for the whole Man to Beast thing...Just kind of~Whaum! and hope for the best...
ToTo from The O.Z.

(in reply to DominantJenny)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Defining actions impacting consent and relationships - 4/30/2008 9:31:20 AM   
kiwisub12


Posts: 4742
Joined: 1/11/2006
Status: offline
how is acting as a sub going to force him to be a dom? or even have domly behaviour?  Apparently he has told you that he isn't interested in bdsm - so  why aren't you accepting that and going on with your vanilla relationship.  To try to act as a sub with no interest from your partner would be incredibly frustrating, and since you are getting your kink satisfied elsewhere, why are you doing this?

You can try to change your behaviours that you or he don't like, and good luck with that, but to manipulate him isn't cool.    Your whole post sounded very manipulative - as in you were in it,not to make him happy, but to make you happy.

Perhapes you should rethink the whole committed relationship thing, because if kink is so important to you that you would manipulate someone that you love to "be" what you want, i can't see how in the long run you could be happy.

Sorry.

< Message edited by kiwisub12 -- 4/30/2008 9:32:00 AM >

(in reply to mzbehavin)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Defining actions impacting consent and relationships - 4/30/2008 9:49:45 AM   
burningdesires47


Posts: 120
Joined: 2/22/2007
Status: offline
kiwisub:

I'm confused, did you read my post? I DON'T want him to be my dom. That's why I'm concerned that me changing my behavior could be viewed as submission.

But I am very concerned with the idea that my post sounded manipulative. How so? I'm trying to avoid seeming manipulative, so I'd like to know where I'm failing--and yes, I'm in this for my happiness, because doing it for HIS happiness or in an effort to change HIS behavior is what would make it manipulative...

< Message edited by burningdesires47 -- 4/30/2008 9:52:58 AM >

(in reply to kiwisub12)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Defining actions impacting consent and relationships - 4/30/2008 10:05:47 AM   
burningdesires47


Posts: 120
Joined: 2/22/2007
Status: offline
DominantJenny: Very well put, thank you for your thoughts! Your comment about everyone submitting sometimes touched on another conversation I was just having, sort of eerie!

(in reply to DominantJenny)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Defining actions impacting consent and relationships - 4/30/2008 6:28:48 PM   
HerLord


Posts: 697
Joined: 2/14/2008
Status: offline
HOLY CRAP!
That is the first thing I thought when I finished reading this long post. It was not it's lenght that drew such response. It was the completely engaging content. I started it thinking I would tire quickly due to it's length and finished it not having skipped a line or been given time to think any thing but the what you were saying. BRAVO!

Now. as for the rest. Shit. Let me work on it a minute. I will quote split shorthen and get to that in a second. damnit. My heads still spinning.

*Edited to give me time to process this. damn.*
We come from different backgrounds.
Completely irrelivent to the relationship. History only makes the persons present. Only what they allow, defines them.
Alright, so I have a relatively vanilla primary partner of three years, who may be into the rough sex, a little slap and tickle, and knowledge about kink in general, but has no desire to be part of the larger kink community, or a D/s relationship, and has a preference for very vanilla sex.
This when done well, can be enough to open doors that may lead to happiness.
A couple of our faves.
If this has already been established then you may be in a position of having to settle for the hard luck of being with a guy other wise worthy of 3 years of your life.Aint that a shame... LOL
 
He dotes on me.
This is always a good thing, however sorta contrary to a strictly D/s relationship devoid of intamacy. So, I am guessing having the intamacy already, you're one up on this scenario.

I reiterate here: he's not my dom.
By being his "sub" you do sort of put him in a position that he has not asked for.
This is where the communication mantra would seem appropriate, shit did that really come out my mouth?

I see ways in which I can change.
This is sometimes a good thing. I specifically MEAN sometimes. The danger here is the notion that one can become something for a possibly over idealized concept of what they think they want before ever really having done it before or in these specific circumstances.

As for the rest... I am afraid I am of no further use. I am as lost in this world of randomness the next bloke. All I can do is that which strikes me at the time to do so. If it's fun, I'll probably do it again at some point.

The only hardfast rule I live by with out exception is Honesty. This is the only thing in my mind in which there are no special circumstances. If you think you can talk to him and let him know that you would like to try doing this with out his nessacary direct "involvement". His participation would not particuraly need be more than his current state of attachment. This is just one option. Perhaps through open discussion you may think of a few more. (fuck more of that damn mantra shit)

Oh and , Good fucking luck!

< Message edited by HerLord -- 4/30/2008 6:55:58 PM >


_____________________________

"People as a whole think they want to hear the truth, until they hear it." -Stormism

(in reply to burningdesires47)
Profile   Post #: 17
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> Defining actions impacting consent and relationships Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094