SNL parady of Hillary. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


pahunkboy -> SNL parady of Hillary. (5/11/2008 8:39:30 AM)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/11/saturday-night-lives-mess_n_101177.html

1.  isnt it odd that fox, Bill Oreilly in particular gets SO much of his material from Ariana?  I admit she is a diva who gets silly....

2.  I seen on tv- talk of Hillary as VP

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/Hillary_vice_president/2008/05/08/94550.html

[tho fox analists such as Karl Rove say she has more power as Senetor and would not take VP]

??

ild like to see it happen.

if 12 million new dems came on 2008;  wouldnt that -mean- well- 2000, 2004 was 50/50ish.  12 mil would mean a dem as prez.

also bloomberg tv says wall st gave 7 mil to obama 7 to hillary, but only 3 mil to mccain; who does wall street want?






popeye1250 -> RE: SNL parady of Hillary. (5/11/2008 11:02:20 AM)

Yeah, I watched that last night, pretty funny.
At least you can parody Hillary.
Obama's so boring what could they parody him about?
I'm still waiting for the "exciting" that his supporters use to describe him as.
Hmm, seeing him as a house painter then watching the paint drying for 5 minutes?




pahunkboy -> RE: SNL parady of Hillary. (5/11/2008 11:55:46 AM)

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,351332,00.html     meanwhile GE selling weapon to Iran.   with no regrets




popeye1250 -> RE: SNL parady of Hillary. (5/11/2008 12:15:41 PM)

PaHunk, Bush is all about "everything for business" and nothing for The People!
That's why I call him "George Herbert Hoover Bush."




pahunkboy -> RE: SNL parady of Hillary. (5/11/2008 12:25:03 PM)

Popeye, the larger question is

1. will we continue the current course,

2. how do we fix the budget. I was thinking on forclosures.  possession is most of the law. problem solved.  on interest rates- lowering the interest rate-conveniently reduces cost of the national debt. hmm.   which when inflation, [things you and I buy, not govt core numbers] kicks in.

I dont see much of anything in the way of solutions. It is like the prez bankrupted the country on purpose- and once "they" have our money, who cares.  Yet, we sell coal to China- complimenst of free trade when we need energy here at home. So which is it? A secure nation, [in all ways] or winner take all.[rat race]

If it was a movie it would be funny.  Since it is so stupid.  Like maybe bush DID have a point that we DO need oil- but now "our" oil- ends up in India, and China, to go with the  manufacturering jobs.  

Yet WE are the one that sought to change China, not vice versa.  Had we left it alone - we would have cheaper oil.

I like to think the CIA has it all figured out.  [but] I dont know.  

So the grid is collapsing and people --well are too comfortable to do any meaning full protesting.

Which leaves us where?




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.015625