rubberpet -> RE: SWEETIE????!!!!???? (5/16/2008 5:47:42 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DiurnalVampire My issue isnt with what he called her, it was that he used it to stave off a good question he didnt want to be bothered with and never got around to addressing. He could have dismissed her with "One moment Madame" and still gotten everyone up in arms. But when you re in the hotseat because you and your opponent are ripping one another to shreds over every little piddly thing you can find out about each other.. giving fuel to the fire is not a good idea. No matter who eventualy wins the nomination, half the party is going to hate them. DV That is very true and a very good point, sweetie. [;)] (Sorry, couldn't resist the joke there). To me, politics and campaigning is about as fake as pro wrestling. They talk shit about each other, rip apart each other's character and integrity, and cause all sorts of strife within the party, yet after the dust settles, they are pretending they are friends again and support the unity of the party. It's all a load of crap. Everyone from the candidates to the media to everyday citizens is looking for a way to make the other candidate look bad. They nit-pick EVERYTHING. The media and candidates need to stop the nit-picking and start focusing on which candidate could do the better job over the topics that matter to us...the VOTERS. Iraq, soaring fuel prices, and an economy in the middle of a recession seem to be the big three. Who cares if he called a reporter "sweetie". What positives could he bring to the White House is what should be the focus. If he's dodging questions, he's either trying to hide something, or he thought the question didn't warrant an answer. Either way, there is still much more of this circus left.
|
|
|
|