Wildfleurs
Posts: 1650
Joined: 9/24/2004 From: Connecticut Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie ~ Fast Reply ~ Just a quickie question for anyone interested, and not aimed at anyone in particular. I am curious, for those who say they don't need a collar to remind them they are owned, if you get married, would you not want a ring? I see collars, rings, markings, whatever, as symbols and expressions of dynamics and not reminders, but I understand that others view them as reminders. So I wonder what people think of wedding rings for marriages, too? Sorry, Lily, if this seems like a hijack, but that comment comes up in pretty much every Collar thread, and the question just occurred to me so hey, why not ask? I think the thing is that people tend to equate collars with ownership, but the way I see them actually used is that they seem to be indicators of going steady (and rarely of owning someone else). I've seen so many couples get collared and then get uncollared (probably with a higher frequency than I've seen divorces). And so the going steady lack of stability I see with collars means that its just not something that resonates for me, and so I don't need a collar to remind me that I'm owned. I have a drawer full of collars that he's bought over the years, just like he's gotten me socks that sit in a drawer. What I do have as markers of ownership are the labia rings and brand - and I know in the future there will probably be some additional body modifications as a physical representation of his ownership. To me those are incredibly meaningful and much more representative of our dynamic than a collar would ever be. Hope that helps answer your question, C~
_____________________________
"Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid." -despair.com ~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~ The heart of it all - http://www.wildfleurs.com ~~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
|