Does a sub have to be reluctant? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


pinnipedster -> Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 4:02:14 PM)

One problem I seem to run into when trying to deal with Dominant women is that I am pretty eager to subject myself to most of what they want to dish out.  I know everyone agrees BDSM should be consensual.  But if your sub *likes* to be whipped, bound, humiliated, etc., then doing that to him is in some ways really not dominance.   Of course, I like at least the *illusion* of being not in control, even when I am playing with safewords and have discussed limits ahead of time.

But as a pesonality thing, does the sub need to display some indication that he's doing things "agaisnt his will" in order for it to be a turn-on for you?  I've run into a few things to suggest this.  I would like to try some feminization play, for instance, but (contrary to what seems to be the popular belief) most Dommes really aren't into it -- and some who would be only want to try it with subs who don't like the idea.  I would hate to think I should *pretend* not to like it -- that's just not me.  In another case, a lady I know was telling me about a time she was subbing for another woman, and the Domme in this case really wasn't into gagging her subs.  So the sub lady started being a smartass to her till she was finally gagged to quiet her down.  I REALLY don't like the idea of misbehaving deliberately just to "earn" a punishment, and nearly all the Mistresses I've ever chatted with agree fully.  Yet it seems to be the smart-alecky and rebellious male subs who get their attention, not those of use who are actually eager to please (but also eager to experience discipline).

How does one get around this?  Or do I have it wrong?  Do I need to learn to *appear* reluctant and resistant in order to attract a dominant woman, particulalry a sadistic one?  I don't know what to do!




angelikaJ -> RE: Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 4:10:51 PM)

I am not a Domme.

However this is my opinion:
to effect an exchange of power you don't need to be reluctant about the activities you will be engaging in.

Surrender for me is about committing myself fully to Him via the moment...








darchChylde -> RE: Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 4:11:57 PM)

Though it says Bondage and Discipline, it doesn't have to mean that you're getting punished.  Ma'am has never punished me physically.  When She beats me, i don't struggle; except only as a direct reaction (my ass feels pain and tries to crawl away).  As a matter of fact, just about any touch from Her and i become very pliable.  i've never had to pretend to reluctance, i like pain; and i think its' allowed.

Just because i like something doesn't make me any less of a submissive, especially when anything we do together is in Her time, and by Her decision and initiation.  Whatever happens between us in under Her control, that's the major thing that defines me as Her submissive.

It makes sense to seek a relationship with someone who likes the same things you do.




MISTRESSKUMA -> RE: Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 4:19:15 PM)

your more like a bottom because you dont seem like your into serving or suffering or even sacrificing for your dominant. you just want to control things from the bottom.




pinnipedster -> RE: Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 4:23:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MISTRESSKUMA

your more like a bottom because you dont seem like your into serving or suffering or even sacrificing for your dominant. you just want to control things from the bottom.


You're assuming a lot from one post.  I do enjoy serving, and I would *like* to suffer for someone -- but I can't seem to find anyone who wants to make me.




LPslittleclip -> RE: Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 4:25:24 PM)

I'm a submissive and I'm not reluctant. i enjoy trying new things and pleasing my M'Lady. if your just playing and don't have a protector/Dominant then you should try to find a steady play partner and find mutual fun. just be yourself that way you will find what you like and might even find that special someone to collar you




AAkasha -> RE: Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 4:31:50 PM)


Once a femdom is attracted to you, her desire to see you in a variety of situations will increase.  Many dominant women enjoy obedience - but they don't enjoy a sub who is so eager to do everything - via hinting, manipulating, asking, "describing," or "sharing his fantasies" that she is burnt out before the toys come out.  A femdom often just wants to be able to *pursue*, and it's impossible to pursue when you are with a pushy bottom.

I am very predatory. I also like reluctance. I like FORCED play. I like to make a man endure things he finds unthinkable, that are against his nature, but he does them to please me. I am in heaven when I am dominating a man and he's doing things for me, not for himself.  That's basically femdom nirvana for me.  But I also enjoy a very sophisticated, experienced submissive (bottom) that enjoys submitting to me yet has a CLEAR understanding of the roles. He knows that just "obeying" isn't going to make me wet.  He knows that his role is to please me through his submission.

That does not mean he FAKES resistance.  God, nothing is more awkward and horrible than a submissive pretending he doesn't want something but you know he's dying for it -- unless he is an incredibly talented actor. In that case, bring it on.

What I seek is not "resistance" in a fake sense; it's *presence*.  Some submissive men have that, others do not.  I do not want to dominate a wet blanket, a robot, or a stoic bottom. I want to dominate a man with a presence and sense of character that shows vulnerability as he's stripped of his will or control or power.  He may be loving every minute of it, but he is savvy enough to know that a certain blink, the way he licks his lips, the way a breath gets caught in his throat and turns into a whimper are what I need.

Akasha




pinnipedster -> RE: Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 4:59:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha


Once a femdom is attracted to you...


Well, of course, getting to that point is the first problem. :)  And part of what I am really wondering, as it just seems like the subs that Dommes are most attracted to are my diametrical opposites.  I do tend to be pretty passive, at least in the presence of dominant women.


quote:

A femdom often just wants to be able to *pursue*...


Now, this is interesting, in that I've been told it's kind of the opposite, at least socially.  A Dominant woman friend of mine has said that she's noted, at socials and open parties and such, that with male doms/female subs, it's the men who do the approaching.  And with domiant women and submissive men...it's the men who are expected to do the approaching.

This may be partly because the ratio of male subs to femdoms is so high.  It may be because of something I have commonly heard from Dommes, that she wants a sub who is interested in HER in particular, not just in finding a dominant woman in general.  Or it may just be because that's the way society in general works: men are expected to court women, not vice-versa.  (Which I hate; one reason I am attracted to female domination was the hope that women would be more prone to take the initiative...but that doesn't seem to generally be the case.)

You may be referring to how you pursue the sub once the initial connection has been made, or some such, but I do have a problem of figuring out how to balance being assertive enough to get noticed in the first place, without going over the line to "pushy."






RedMagic1 -> RE: Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 5:07:36 PM)

There's a difference between being submissive and powerless.  Carry yourself as though you have power, worth and value, but are willing to exchange that power with the right person.

This sounds a lot like, "Women always go for the bad boys, leaving nice guys like me in the cold."  Well, bullshit.  Nice guys absolutely finish first, at least once the woman's had a couple bad experiences.  But --- there's a big difference between being nice, and being a wuss.

What do you stand for?  If a superhot black latex babe told you, "I'll do everything you want as long as you do X," what X's would cause you to say, "No thanks"?  Part of treating a domme as though she's more than the life support system for a toybag is treating yourself as though you are more than a fetishist.




LotusSong -> RE: Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 5:21:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pinnipedster

But as a pesonality thing, does the sub need to display some indication that he's doing things "agaisnt his will" in order for it to be a turn-on for you? 


Nahhhhhhhhhhh




hardbodysub -> RE: Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 5:27:14 PM)

I tend to agree with the OP that if the sub likes everything the "dominant" does, and the sub doesn't have to do anything he doesn't like, then where's the dominance? It's really just top and bottom. I don't think force is necessary (although it can add to the excitement), but some sort of persuasion or coercion, either overt or subtle, is necessary or it just doesn't meet the definitiion of domination. In other words, domination is active; merely accepting submission, passively, isn't really dominance, IMNSHO.

*Disclaimer (yawn)*: That's not to say that active domination is "better" than any other form. I just don't consider the others to be real domination, and wish we had better agreed-upon terminology for it. Top and bottom would cover it.

I do really enjoy Aakasha's comments on this.




MISTRESSKUMA -> RE: Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 5:48:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub

I tend to agree with the OP that if the sub likes everything the "dominant" does, and the sub doesn't have to do anything he doesn't like, then where's the dominance? It's really just top and bottom. I don't think force is necessary (although it can add to the excitement), but some sort of persuasion or coercion, either overt or subtle, is necessary or it just doesn't meet the definitiion of domination. In other words, domination is active; merely accepting submission, passively, isn't really dominance, IMNSHO.

*Disclaimer (yawn)*: That's not to say that active domination is "better" than any other form. I just don't consider the others to be real domination, and wish we had better agreed-upon terminology for it. Top and bottom would cover it.

I do really enjoy Aakasha's comments on this.


hey I know. as it goes for the various doms and their princesses they pamper and cater to, there's a name too for the male bottoms which like to have their fetishes catered to. they can be called princes by the women tops. instead of pampering you like doms do for their princesses, they can cater to your fetishes like bondage, crossdressing, pony plain, pain, tease and denial and all the other things on your list and you can be their prince....prince has a nicer ring.




MISTRESSKUMA -> RE: Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 5:51:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: pinnipedster

quote:

ORIGINAL: MISTRESSKUMA

your more like a bottom because you dont seem like your into serving or suffering or even sacrificing for your dominant. you just want to control things from the bottom.


You're assuming a lot from one post.  I do enjoy serving, and I would *like* to suffer for someone -- but I can't seem to find anyone who wants to make me.



Im sorry. I guess I need to ask, serve and suffer in a way which ends up coming back to you and the fetishes you have or do ya mean serve like doing things that dont relate to you. For such examples as painting her entire house and rubbing her feet and things like these kind of examples?




darchChylde -> RE: Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 5:56:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hardbodysub

I tend to agree with the OP that if the sub likes everything the "dominant" does, and the sub doesn't have to do anything he doesn't like, then where's the dominance? It's really just top and bottom. .


Well many relationships are like this.  Where what goes on in a scene are things that both parties enjoy, but outside of the scene is where the actual D/s goes on.  Ma'am and i have only had one "real scene", which only included (not by any agreement or negotiation, but simply by virtue of the toys Ma'am grabbed and decided to play with) things that i enjoyed, some more than others.

But Ma'am has certain plans to do things that i specifically do not like, but are not hard-limits; such as using ice, and doing things to my nipples.  i'm sure that She will introduce other things along the way that are even less to my tastes.  We've spent 20 months concentrating on training and service and simply building our relationship and the family, not to mention numerous real-life events (both good and bad) and our play had been very casual and most often playful.

So, maybe our play-style would thus far be labeled as "Top and bottom", but that doesn't make me any less Her submissive or Her any less my Dominant.  Our relationship is based on love, trust and the D/s dynamics of our strange little family and absolutely not about what happens in a scene or in a bedroom.

Play or scening for us is like playing role-playing games, it's fun and an interest we share which brings us closer together; but it's not our relationship.




RedMagic1 -> RE: Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 6:05:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MISTRESSKUMA
I need to ask, serve and suffer in a way which ends up coming back to you and the fetishes you have

Bingo.




AAkasha -> RE: Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 6:41:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pinnipedster

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha


Once a femdom is attracted to you...


Well, of course, getting to that point is the first problem. :)  And part of what I am really wondering, as it just seems like the subs that Dommes are most attracted to are my diametrical opposites.  I do tend to be pretty passive, at least in the presence of dominant women.


quote:

A femdom often just wants to be able to *pursue*...


Now, this is interesting, in that I've been told it's kind of the opposite, at least socially.  A Dominant woman friend of mine has said that she's noted, at socials and open parties and such, that with male doms/female subs, it's the men who do the approaching.  And with domiant women and submissive men...it's the men who are expected to do the approaching.

This may be partly because the ratio of male subs to femdoms is so high.  It may be because of something I have commonly heard from Dommes, that she wants a sub who is interested in HER in particular, not just in finding a dominant woman in general.  Or it may just be because that's the way society in general works: men are expected to court women, not vice-versa.  (Which I hate; one reason I am attracted to female domination was the hope that women would be more prone to take the initiative...but that doesn't seem to generally be the case.)

You may be referring to how you pursue the sub once the initial connection has been made, or some such, but I do have a problem of figuring out how to balance being assertive enough to get noticed in the first place, without going over the line to "pushy."





If you tend to be passive, that's a problem.  Some sub men have this fantasy that a femdom will come into his life, pursue (and/or kidnap) him relentlessly, make all the moves, show all the initiative...that's part of the ideal.  I have bad news for you.  If you are passive, it's not going to happen.  You must be remarkable in some way, and have the ability to show it.  You must have some of these traits: brilliance, charisma, charm, class, wealth.  Period.  The shy, passive, boring guy isn't going to attract a woman unless it's out of pity - or, he is SO good looking that she wants to mold him.  Dominant women are attracted to power, charisma, class, self confidence.  Not the weak or those with low self image or self esteem. You have to be able to show INITIATIVE on some level.  That's where you are going to have to get creative. Just putting yourself "out there" isn't enough.

Yes, I like to pursue or be predatory - but, that's after I see something I like. That's where the "passive" thing won't get you anywhere.  I have always pursued men after they showed me something in their personality that I liked -- either from afar, or by charming me to death.  I also always gravitated to men who were exceptional in some area - some talent, intelligence, physical strength or beauty. Or, very creative.  Quirky, geeky, or just simply hot - there had to be something.  Something had to spark my interest.  Then, they had to not push me over with their fantasies, needs, desires, or wimpiness.

But more specifically when I said "pursue" I meant pursue the dominance in the relationship - be the one to control the speed, direction, tempo.  Too many sub men are pushy, demanding, whiny, or sulking....it's so annoying.  They do not give dominant women a chance to even build up some desire - they are like a broken record.  When a submissive is more focused on getting to know the WOMAN first and foremost, and being charming about it, it gives her a chance to want to peel him like an onion -- to get inside of him (both literally and figuratitvely).

At the core though, one thing must be present:  Attraction. 

Akasha




darchChylde -> RE: Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 7:06:09 PM)

What i believe AAkasha is saying here is great advice, and the natural extension of what i've often said in previous posts.  Too often submissive men will see a Dominant woman and leave forget about the woman, focusing only on the Dominant.  Also, submissive men will go into a public setting and straight into submissive mode, forgetting to be a man.  i'm not saying that you necessarily have to embody the entirety of the macho stereotype, but instead to simply be yourself.  Strong and assertive, to an extent; you want to be a particular woman's submissive, not the world's submissive.

If you have an active local community, try going to a social or munch where you can showcase your talents; give yourself an advantage of some sort.  When i first introduced myself to the local community, i went to a social that was held at a karaoke bar.  i love to sing, and can be a bit of a ham in that type of spotlight.  It allowed me to stand out and feel very confident; which was exceptional for me, as i'm demophobic and have issues with crowds and noise.  i'll have to say that it worked greatly to my benefit.  That night i made a number of friends that i still have and even met Ma'am that night.




moki1984 -> RE: Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 7:07:30 PM)

no, i prefer truth. if you enjoy pain...great. but then it will be a reward not a punishment. be honest and they will recognize what is really a reward vs a punishment to you




darchChylde -> RE: Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 7:14:52 PM)

About being passive.  Ok, so many Dominant women like to hunt for their prey... what do you think the more exciting kill would be, taking down a 10 point buck after stalking the woods all morning, or a dumbstruck deer staring at her headlights and being taken out by her volvo at 40 miles an hour?




burningdesires47 -> RE: Does a sub have to be reluctant? (6/1/2008 7:21:06 PM)

Warning: I'm a switch. ETA: that warning was because I was going to go into something else that I decided was irrelevant. But I'll let it stand because it sort of matters.

It's very, very rare that I feel dominant toward men. When I do, it seems to be that it's the ones who are gentle, kind, compassionate... and they're the ones who pamper me. It's when I say "Gosh, a beer would be so refreshing," and without even asking, there's a beer in front of me. Those are the guys I end up dominating. And guaranteed, if they're at all reluctant about it, it takes all the fun out of it for me. So, no, absolutely, a male sub shouldn't be reluctant toward me or my actions.

Female subs are only slightly a different story. I can tolerate a little bit of reluctance from women, but still, only a little. And really, it's not even so much that I can tolerate reluctance, so much as I enjoy pursuing women as a submissive more than I enjoy that with men.

Maybe it's just that women pout better ;)




Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875