Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

SSC/RACK


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> SSC/RACK Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
SSC/RACK - 6/1/2008 7:24:26 PM   
torsionman


Posts: 74
Joined: 7/28/2004
Status: offline
First, yes, I know there is an ice cream cone on my screen name though I've been here for several years with a short break. I don't speak much and the reason I'm in "Ask a Mistress" is I would like to know from a Dominant Woman's point of view as I'm a sub and straight. There will be many viewpoints even if a reply isn't added here by a Dominant Woman. I will be looking for an answer from Women.
Now the question: Where is the line between SSC and RACK? For those that don't know, Safe, Sane, Consentual and Risk Aware Consentual Kink.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: SSC/RACK - 6/1/2008 8:01:52 PM   
MasterFireMaam


Posts: 5587
Joined: 3/1/2006
From: Charleston, WV
Status: offline
What line are you asking about? You'll have to make the question more clear.

Master Fire


_____________________________

The power of who we are can be intoxicating. The power of who we could be is humbling.
-----
Ms Relationship Books
-----
BDSM How-To Books

(in reply to torsionman)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: SSC/RACK - 6/1/2008 8:29:36 PM   
khem


Posts: 300
Joined: 8/8/2005
Status: offline
To me it's always been a semantics debate.  I think some people who play a bit closer to the edge tend to use RACK.

This essay, (you'll have to read a ways to get to the meat) goes into the issues with the SSC thing a bit:

http://www.sexuality.org/latrans.html

(in reply to MasterFireMaam)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: SSC/RACK - 6/1/2008 8:39:17 PM   
DreamyLadySnow


Posts: 359
Joined: 1/23/2005
Status: offline
Do you know what the risks are? Are you willing to accept them? If yes, that's RACK.
SSC doesn't work for me, because too many I know who use the term believe there is no inherent risk in bdsm. That scares me.

LS

(in reply to khem)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: SSC/RACK - 6/1/2008 10:11:09 PM   
HeavansKeeper


Posts: 1254
Joined: 5/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: khem

To me it's always been a semantics debate.  I think some people who play a bit closer to the edge tend to use RACK.



Exactly right, probably a semantics debate. 

In short, they both contain consent, so that's out, as a difference.

I like the legal definition of sanity, being of sound state of mind abd body to make decision.  At this point, those who are incapable of making a decision about an act should not.  Not wanting the act to occur is different than not being able to understand it.  In this semantic view, Sane = Risk Aware.

Sane = Risk Aware.  Consent = Consent.

The difference is safety.  For something to not be considered safe (by whatever measure being used) it cannot be SSC, but could be RACK.


_____________________________

The Loving Owner of HisHeavan

... You've waited your whole life for this moment...

(in reply to khem)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: SSC/RACK - 6/2/2008 4:09:24 AM   
Madame4a


Posts: 2045
Joined: 2/4/2008
From: Washington, DC area
Status: offline
In my opinion, they are the same thing in the end, doesn't matter how much someone wants to pretend they are different.

Also, neither set of buzz words will keep you safe, just like safe words -- its about people, not the words.

YOU are the only person who can keep you safe.

< Message edited by Madame4a -- 6/2/2008 4:26:17 AM >


_____________________________

You're crazy bitch
But you f*ck so good, I'm on top of it
When I dream, I'm doing you all night
Scratches all down my back to keep me right on

(in reply to torsionman)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: SSC/RACK - 6/2/2008 4:54:03 AM   
BoiJen


Posts: 2608
Joined: 3/7/2007
Status: offline
I'm not a Domme so I guess my opinion will only go so far here...but here goes anyways...

Most attribute the term to David Stein who coined it in 1984 for GMSMA. More information can be found in the essay titled Safe Sane Consensual: The Evolution of a Shibboleth, in which he states that the term was developed "to distinguish the kind of S/M I wanted to do from the criminally abusive or neurotically self-destructive behavior popularly associated with the term 'sadomasochism'."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safe,_sane_and_consensual

They say the terms are used interchangably...I don't think so though. David Stein used the term in a sense to educate the "vanilla" world that we're "ok." It's a term used as a general umbrella...that's, unfortunately, turned "against" some "edge players" because other people see the words "safe" and "sane." And the phrase "That's not safe! No sane person would do that!" is an opinion shouted by a great deal of people who subscribe to "SSC." "SSC" is now being used as a limiting term. The words "safe" and "sane" are being used to push upon others' play a barrier of "well I wouldn't do that because I don't think it's safe."

"SSC" ...let's break it down...
"Safe"...a subjective word most of the time. Your "safe" might just be my "hella good time" (often is in my case)
"Sane"...another subjective word most of the time...how many people play with clinical psychologists to get the diagnosis prior to play time?
"Consensual"...a word that only has mean ing the very moment that it's questioned by anyone. It's also the only word that shows up both in "RACK" and "SSC"
What I mean by that is...in the moment prior to the scene someone may entirely love the idea...in the moment of the scene they may wish to be anywhere but there...and in the moment after the scene they may look back and enjoy it and say the scene was their "dream come true." Consensuality (sp?) is only a matter of the moment...look up consensual nonconsent.

"RACK" is used more and more by people who, for lack of a better words, don't give a shit what other people are doing so long as everybody is happy at the end of the day. It's more inclusive of "edge play." And less of the room to impose one's idea of "how things should be" than "SSC."

"RACK"...I'm an equal opprotunity (sp?), arrogant asshole :)
"Risk"...risk is a subjective word...for an experienced sky diver the "risk" of skydiving may be considered less...it's up to the individual to measure what risks they are willing to accpet.
"Aware"...also subjective...however, for the sake of the topic, we mean "Consciously Aware" in all possibilities of the words.
"Consensual"...covered this one already see above
"Kink"..the final subjective word...for some people any other position than missionary is "extreme." For others..."death is only a limit because I can only do it once" (that's a me quote)

And that's the difference in my opinion.

boi

(in reply to Madame4a)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: SSC/RACK - 6/2/2008 8:21:17 AM   
pixelslave


Posts: 1444
Joined: 8/19/2006
Status: offline
I agree with BoiJen that there's a distinct difference between SSC and RACK.  I also think that many who think they're playing SSC are actually playing RACK or else aren't SSC.  There are many things which are considered as SSC only because of ignorance of the possible risks by the unenlightened or unaware who assume the practices are safe only because they're so common. 
 
After reading the full definition of RACK, while I don't consider myself anything close to an edge player as many seem to associate the term with, I do consider myself RACK.  Why?  Because I want to know the real risks involved in any kind of play I'm involved in.  I used to race bicyles which had real risks to my body's safety involved.  I've climbed mountains above 14,000 feet.  Again, real and identifiable risks as well as safety equipment available to reduce it just as with helmets for cycling.  That's also the case with essentially everything involved with wiitwd!  Any Mistress that I'm involved with, I fully expect to have the sense to educate herself, including being mentored if necessary on any kind of play we're going to try before we ever go there.  That also includes educating me on the risks involved so I can make an informed decision on whether or not I feel safe as well. 
 
 - pixel
 

_____________________________

Chivalry isn't dead! It's for those who have it in their hearts & are willing to be taught. It's a way of life, a code of honor; this one's armor still needs some polishing!

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: SSC/RACK - 6/2/2008 9:10:03 AM   
MasterFireMaam


Posts: 5587
Joined: 3/1/2006
From: Charleston, WV
Status: offline
My main distinction between SSC and RACK: EVERYTHING falls under RACK as long as the two criteria, knowledge and consent, are met. What falls under SSC is widely debatable and very subjective.

Master Fire


_____________________________

The power of who we are can be intoxicating. The power of who we could be is humbling.
-----
Ms Relationship Books
-----
BDSM How-To Books

(in reply to torsionman)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: SSC/RACK - 6/2/2008 9:18:11 AM   
Madame4a


Posts: 2045
Joined: 2/4/2008
From: Washington, DC area
Status: offline
I didn't expect much agreement on what I had to say.. I tend not to throw either of them around...

_____________________________

You're crazy bitch
But you f*ck so good, I'm on top of it
When I dream, I'm doing you all night
Scratches all down my back to keep me right on

(in reply to MasterFireMaam)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: SSC/RACK - 6/2/2008 10:03:14 AM   
BoiJen


Posts: 2608
Joined: 3/7/2007
Status: offline
I'ma add something...

SSC and RACk are not particular things that are done. They are views and opinions and "requirements" for action choices. No particular act falls under either category of approach.

Madam4A: I don't think you're wrong. Yes they are the same thing in the end...most things that are comparable (sp?) (PS my spelling sucks) are that way. You end up with the same result. With this, as it is with some other things, it's not the end that's being discussed as different. It's not the beginning either...it's the middle. It's the forming of the opinion and view.

I do agree...safe words are not there to keep people "safe from harm"...they are there to do damage control. And if and when and how that happens is often greatly determined by who you're with. And YOU (not you Madam4A...the general "you) are the person who decides who you're with.

from the boi

(in reply to Madame4a)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: SSC/RACK - 6/2/2008 10:14:17 AM   
Madame4a


Posts: 2045
Joined: 2/4/2008
From: Washington, DC area
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen


I do agree...safe words are not there to keep people "safe from harm"...they are there to do damage control. And if and when and how that happens is often greatly determined by who you're with. And YOU (not you Madam4A...the general "you) are the person who decides who you're with.

from the boi


exactly.. I have the same reactions to SSC, RACK and safe words, for the most part -- people think that using these words keeps them some how from harm... it has nothing to do with the words or even how they are defined.. its about the people...

using a safe word does not mean that you will be kept from harm, how your partner reacts to that word is what will do that...

I'm splitting hairs... I tend to really dislike this discussion.. *grin* ... I'd rather focus on the dynamics of how one keeps themselves safe...

_____________________________

You're crazy bitch
But you f*ck so good, I'm on top of it
When I dream, I'm doing you all night
Scratches all down my back to keep me right on

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: SSC/RACK - 6/2/2008 10:21:08 AM   
BoiJen


Posts: 2608
Joined: 3/7/2007
Status: offline
THAT sounds like an excellent discussion.

(in reply to Madame4a)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: SSC/RACK - 6/2/2008 11:17:28 AM   
Madame4a


Posts: 2045
Joined: 2/4/2008
From: Washington, DC area
Status: offline
Right... I will leave aside all the stuff about meeting people online.. that's a discussion that's been done to death..

so.. from a face to face perspective.. and how *I* do things...

I don't play with people I don't know
I take time to meet people as people
I've known people for many years before I've played with them, in some situations
I take my time, no matter how much my hormones scream and how hot someone is, I do take my time
I tend to check people out with others that I trust...

I don't think much replaces experience and experience WITH someone...

I watch how someone plays, if possible, and first time is often in a public space, not private

Those things don't always work and they aren't for everyone.. that's what I do

I also tend to want a no safe words situation eventually when I play... although I do have a way that is basically the same as a safeword -- recently I started playing with a good friend.. we've known one another for a few years.. when I started to play with him the second time -- in very crowded and loud space I said "scream my name, not Ma'am" and I'll check in with you.. we'll go from there...

that's me

next?

_____________________________

You're crazy bitch
But you f*ck so good, I'm on top of it
When I dream, I'm doing you all night
Scratches all down my back to keep me right on

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: SSC/RACK - 6/2/2008 11:54:17 AM   
ShaktiSama


Posts: 1674
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline
I see a significant difference between SSC and RACK.  Generally, the lines are drawn around types of play that carry a genuine risk of injury, mutilation or death.

Just as a general rule--when people self-identify as Safe Sane and Consensual, they are generally drawing a line against some or all forms of edgeplay which can result in lifelong mutilation or death.  An SSC player simply will not do these these things, under any circumstances, because there is no way to reduce the risks to an acceptable limit.  The activities will never be legitimately defined as "safe"--whether they are "sane" or not may be open to debate.

RACK players, on the other hand, will not place these limits on themselves or their activities.  They will play any game that is pleasing to all the players concerned, with full awareness of the risks, and usually trying to limit those risks as much as possible--but knowing, at all times, that their games are NOT safe and that there will always be SOME signficant risk, even if you make it as small as possible.

The most common example to come up would be certain types of "breathplay", especially those that involve strangulation.  These games always carry a risk of coma, brain damage or death--and unfortunately there is really no way of making the game a lot safer.  Jay Wiseman has written a couple of good warning articles on the subject of strangulation which point out the medical realities, so I will not belabor them here.  The upshot here is that IF you chose to choke your partner unconscious for your mutual pleasure, you must accept the possibility that he or she will not wake up again.  It's a Risk Aware, Consensual Kink.

Some people are not able to accept those risks.  Some people are.  Personally, I lean toward the SSC side of things myself: I'm not even excessively fond of living visible marks on a partner, much less risking permanent injury or death for the sake of a sex game. 

_____________________________

"Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea."
-- Robert A. Heinlein

(in reply to Madame4a)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: SSC/RACK - 6/2/2008 7:56:15 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiSama

I see a significant difference between SSC and RACK.  Generally, the lines are drawn around types of play that carry a genuine risk of injury, mutilation or death.

Just as a general rule--when people self-identify as Safe Sane and Consensual, they are generally drawing a line against some or all forms of edgeplay which can result in lifelong mutilation or death.  An SSC player simply will not do these these things, under any circumstances, because there is no way to reduce the risks to an acceptable limit.  The activities will never be legitimately defined as "safe"--whether they are "sane" or not may be open to debate.

RACK players, on the other hand, will not place these limits on themselves or their activities.  They will play any game that is pleasing to all the players concerned, with full awareness of the risks, and usually trying to limit those risks as much as possible--but knowing, at all times, that their games are NOT safe and that there will always be SOME signficant risk, even if you make it as small as possible.

The most common example to come up would be certain types of "breathplay", especially those that involve strangulation.  These games always carry a risk of coma, brain damage or death--and unfortunately there is really no way of making the game a lot safer.  Jay Wiseman has written a couple of good warning articles on the subject of strangulation which point out the medical realities, so I will not belabor them here.  The upshot here is that IF you chose to choke your partner unconscious for your mutual pleasure, you must accept the possibility that he or she will not wake up again.  It's a Risk Aware, Consensual Kink.

Some people are not able to accept those risks.  Some people are.  Personally, I lean toward the SSC side of things myself: I'm not even excessively fond of living visible marks on a partner, much less risking permanent injury or death for the sake of a sex game. 

***  I want to put the disclaimer on this that I am only referring these comments about play with only My collared sub.  These are not My views when it comes to casual play partners.

I highlighted the above because this is very much the way I see Myself.   There are risks involved with a lot of the things that I do.  Being aware of the risks doesn't necessarily make the activity safe.  It means I take the precautions to make the risk as minimal as possible. 

It's very important to Me that clip is aware of the potential danger of anything that I do.  These are discussions that we have before a particular activity is engaged.  He does know the potential of what can possibly happen beforehand.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to ShaktiSama)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: SSC/RACK - 6/2/2008 8:46:20 PM   
torsionman


Posts: 74
Joined: 7/28/2004
Status: offline
WOW, I didn't expect the amount and length of answers that are on this thread. BoiJen, I'm still checking your referances. I'm not sure that  these words are THAT subjective because of the definitions in the dictionary of each word. I will agree on the subjectability of the user of these words and that is what makes them so "loose" in their meaning. I agree with you that they are differant in their meaning. Madame4a, keeping yourself safe is the normal desire of anyone sane. I suspect "hurt" and "harm" come into play when hurt means temporary and harm becomes permanent. I suppose your "safeword" IS your name as it calls attention towards a possible harmful situation, yes?
I have to say at this point, there is a wealth of information all of you have offered here. I am studying what is here and would love to acknowledge everyone by name.
There isn't enough room and time now (11:44pm and my alarm goes off at 4:00am) do that. Thank you so far and I will be back.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: SSC/RACK - 6/2/2008 9:03:21 PM   
pixelslave


Posts: 1444
Joined: 8/19/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaktiSama

I see a significant difference between SSC and RACK.  Generally, the lines are drawn around types of play that carry a genuine risk of injury, mutilation or death.

Just as a general rule--when people self-identify as Safe Sane and Consensual, they are generally drawing a line against some or all forms of edgeplay which can result in lifelong mutilation or death.  An SSC player simply will not do these these things, under any circumstances, because there is no way to reduce the risks to an acceptable limit.  The activities will never be legitimately defined as "safe"--whether they are "sane" or not may be open to debate.

RACK players, on the other hand, will not place these limits on themselves or their activities.  They will play any game that is pleasing to all the players concerned, with full awareness of the risks, and usually trying to limit those risks as much as possible--but knowing, at all times, that their games are NOT safe and that there will always be SOME signficant risk, even if you make it as small as possible.

The most common example to come up would be certain types of "breathplay", especially those that involve strangulation.  These games always carry a risk of coma, brain damage or death--and unfortunately there is really no way of making the game a lot safer.  Jay Wiseman has written a couple of good warning articles on the subject of strangulation which point out the medical realities, so I will not belabor them here.  The upshot here is that IF you chose to choke your partner unconscious for your mutual pleasure, you must accept the possibility that he or she will not wake up again.  It's a Risk Aware, Consensual Kink.

Some people are not able to accept those risks.  Some people are.  Personally, I lean toward the SSC side of things myself: I'm not even excessively fond of living visible marks on a partner, much less risking permanent injury or death for the sake of a sex game. 

***  I want to put the disclaimer on this that I am only referring these comments about play with only My collared sub.  These are not My views when it comes to casual play partners.

I highlighted the above because this is very much the way I see Myself.   There are risks involved with a lot of the things that I do.  Being aware of the risks doesn't necessarily make the activity safe.  It means I take the precautions to make the risk as minimal as possible. 

It's very important to Me that clip is aware of the potential danger of anything that I do.  These are discussions that we have before a particular activity is engaged.  He does know the potential of what can possibly happen beforehand.



Lady Pact,
I think you've restated my comment from my earlier post in a more articulate way.  I can't say it loudly enough that much of what is considered SSC still has risks involved, which does not necessarily make it SAFE!  The term SSC is very misleading in that regard and as such, IMO associating the term RACK with edge play does RACK a great disservice.  There are so many simple things, like keeping toys clean or sterilized as appropriate that those who think they're SSC never consider, but put themselves at great risk when they don't do such things such as when using those same toys with more than one partner.  That's just one simple example I can readily think of. 
 
Another would be playing with rope for bondage.  Sounds simple enough off hand.  Yet tie it too tight or in the wrong place and you can permanently damage a nerve causing someone to lose the use of a hand or even their arm!  Do you have EMT scissors immediately at hand to cut someone loose in an emergency?  If not, anyone who plays with rope should have them immediately accessible as a precaution.  I could go on and on, but I think I've made my point.  There's a risk associated with essentially anything we do!  Nothing is totally safe.  That's the essense of RACK if you read the original author's description.  Its not at all about edgeplay, it's about being aware of what the risks are in any activity, understanding them, and then making an informed decision as to whether or not you want to participate in that activity!   
 
I feel compelled to add that I never understood this until I read the author's material for myself.
 
 - pixel


_____________________________

Chivalry isn't dead! It's for those who have it in their hearts & are willing to be taught. It's a way of life, a code of honor; this one's armor still needs some polishing!

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: SSC/RACK - 6/2/2008 10:24:58 PM   
ElanSubdued


Posts: 1511
Status: offline
So is kissing your boy while he's bound to the rack... is that RACK or SSC?  What if one of the legs of the rack breaks and the whole thing falls over?  The Domina and/or the submissive could break something or die.  I'm just so confused and my head hurts!

Seriously though, this has been a very helpful thread.  I don't have anything to add presently, but as a spectator, I'm enjoying and learning from this discussion immensely.

Elan.

(in reply to torsionman)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: SSC/RACK - 6/2/2008 10:28:14 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
It is SSC so long as the rack stays in place and does not fall, then it becomes RACK.
 
It also is a potential trip to the ER and an embarrassing conversation with your home insurance claims adjuster.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ElanSubdued
So is kissing your boy while he's bound to the rack... is that RACK or SSC?  What if one of the legs of the rack breaks and the whole thing falls over? 


_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to ElanSubdued)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> SSC/RACK Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094