MissMorrigan
Posts: 2309
Joined: 1/15/2005 Status: offline
|
Unks, I care little about the persons themselves, the fact remains they BOTH hosted a reality tv show which saw them 'preside' over people who, rather (likely b/c they couldn't afford to) than seek recompense through the judiciary, preferred to sign up to a reality show so I see little difference at all simply b/c one revels in their notoriety as a hard-assed haridan, and the other wanted to be seen as the clean-cut 'straight down the line' judge who offered fair play. Are you telling me Wapner never allowed his personal judgements to cloud his celebrity ones? If you are, you're naive. Edited to add: Neither Wapner's nor Sheindlin's courtrooms were/are actual courtrooms, they are stage sets. The 'cases' are 'presided' over, for sure, by the producers of the show, of that you can be certain. Reality shows have one purpose, entertainment, nothing more. Simply b/c Wapner is 'nicer' than Sheindlin when he interacts with the participants in no way separates him from her, in my opinion.
< Message edited by MissMorrigan -- 6/3/2008 3:49:38 AM >
_____________________________
The Tooth Fairy who teaches kids to sell body parts for money. A free society is a society where it is safe to find one's self unpopular and where history has shown that exceptions are not that exceptional.
|