BRNaughtyAngel
Posts: 1821
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: slaveluci quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterFireMaam I think neediness as you have descriped here isn't really appealing in any one. There seems to be an assumption, however, that it's generally more ok for the sub to have these tendencies than the Dominant. My guess is that it's because of a certain degree of weakness to be needy and Doms aren't allowed to be weak while subs are. I think you're spot on here, MFM. To me, there is a delicate balance between being able to admit you have needs and being clingy. The latter is off-putting to me in anyone, whatever they identify as. Yet, as you say, it seems to be seen as more acceptable (and even expected to a degree) if a sub/slave/bottom acts that way. For a dom/master/top to do so, indicates needs which much indicate weakness which is never acceptable in a "top type," right? . You really summed it up succintly. As a slave who is totally in love with and obedient to her Master, I can honestly say I exhibit none of the "clingy" types of behavior. Not all of us act that way. On the other hand, I would say Master is somewhat like BRNaughtyAngel describes hers in that He is not afraid to ask when He's feeling He needs a little reassurance. I'm so glad about that. I don't want a stone wall for a Master/Husband but someone who can be open and vulnerable at times without feeling "weak"................luci Exactly luci! No one wants a whiney, clingy partner who sucks the life out of 'em, but having and expressing needs, and feeling safe enough with your partner to be vulnerable....... that, to me, is essential to a relationship, for everyone in the relationship. And we all have times when we need extra care, attention or reassurances. I would be very upset if He was in that place of need and let some notion of "domliness" or "macho manliness" keep Him from expressing those needs to me. We take care of each other and that means there will be times when each of us has to be the other's strength.
|