Griswold
Posts: 2739
Joined: 2/12/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Level quote:
"Dave, stop. Stop, will you? Stop, Dave. Will you stop, Dave?” So the supercomputer HAL pleads with the implacable astronaut Dave Bowman in a famous and weirdly poignant scene toward the end of Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey. Bowman, having nearly been sent to a deep-space death by the malfunctioning machine, is calmly, coldly disconnecting the memory circuits that control its artificial brain. “Dave, my mind is going,” HAL says, forlornly. “I can feel it. I can feel it.” I can feel it, too. Over the past few years I’ve had an uncomfortable sense that someone, or something, has been tinkering with my brain, remapping the neural circuitry, reprogramming the memory. My mind isn’t going—so far as I can tell—but it’s changing. I’m not thinking the way I used to think. I can feel it most strongly when I’m reading. Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy. My mind would get caught up in the narrative or the turns of the argument, and I’d spend hours strolling through long stretches of prose. That’s rarely the case anymore. Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages. I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do. I feel as if I’m always dragging my wayward brain back to the text. The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle. I think I know what’s going on. For more than a decade now, I’ve been spending a lot of time online, searching and surfing and sometimes adding to the great databases of the Internet. The Web has been a godsend to me as a writer. Research that once required days in the stacks or periodical rooms of libraries can now be done in minutes. A few Google searches, some quick clicks on hyperlinks, and I’ve got the telltale fact or pithy quote I was after. Even when I’m not working, I’m as likely as not to be foraging in the Web’s info-thickets—reading and writing e-mails, scanning headlines and blog posts, watching videos and listening to podcasts, or just tripping from link to link to link. (Unlike footnotes, to which they’re sometimes likened, hyperlinks don’t merely point to related works; they propel you toward them.) http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google I see what he's saying.... I love to read, and have spent God knows how many hours doing so, but now... I've got several stacks of books, and I don't read them. Or, if I do, it takes forever. I'll read a page, or three, then start fucking around online. Level, I'd just like to say, I appreciate your posts. You always post to get people thinking....and you never inject your opinion (and while I appreciate that...I would respect you much more, if you, beforehand, got my opinion...and then expressed it as your own)....moreover, you post all the pertinent facts, along with the links (unlike me, who's far too lazy...who just links up....and expects everyone to link to and by virtue, understand my prose). Now...on to the topic at hand...no, I don't think we're being dumbed down... (But I do think far too many people presume Wikipedeia (sp?) among other sites, provide a far too finite proof of what is...and...I suspect they believe what they read). Too often.
|