RE: Etiquette question

RE: Etiquette question (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress

Message

LolaBabalon -> RE: Etiquette question (6/25/2008 3:28:51 PM)
I really must agree with the Dominant ladies here who mentioned that one of the worst things you can do is simply write "How may I serve you?". It's lazy, and I would rather have someone propose an idea that I dislike rather than send me a boring, generic request for me to spend time viewing their profiles and finding something in there that they might be good at. At least it shows some initiative. Personally, I don't want a slave who is going to expect me to lead them constantly - I don't feel that just because I'm Dominant means that I should have to always take initiative. My profile clearly states that I don't respond well to the generic messages that are obviously being sent to every Dominant Female on the site, but I still get them. In my opinion, it just makes it easier to ignore the people who can't spend 5 minutes to get to know the person they are trying to initiate an interaction with. As for rules, I say: definitely read the profile, stay away from cheesy compliments in the first message, and always do try to make it personalized, because regardless of anything else, everyone likes to feel that someone has taken the time to show interest in them.

RedMagic1 -> RE: Etiquette question (6/25/2008 3:53:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: jonathan Jeez, it's not physics, the everything theory, it's kink. What you refer to is General Unification Theory, reconciling of Einsteinian relativity with quantum mechanics. Poof. Just so you know, you demonstrated to me with this "correction" that you are a pseudo-intellectual poser. A "theory of everything" merges all gauge symmetries, hence is more comprehensive than the General Unification Theory you describe, hence at least presumably will be harder to achieve. (Wikipedia describes the difference well, for the geekily curious. Keith Devlin's book The Millenium Problems includes a lay introduction to gauge theory, for anyone who is even nerdier.) It's cool with me if someone doesn't know the difference, and it's even cooler if someone doesn't care about the difference. Use the anonymity of a message board to act like an expert when you don't know shit? I'm calling you on it.

Sylverdawn -> RE: Etiquette question (6/25/2008 4:17:39 PM)
POLITE>>>>>POLITE>>>>>>>>>>>>>POLITE>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did I say... be polite.. honest helps.. brush your teeth.. act like your taking your best friends baby sister out on a date.. only... at the end if your lucky she might smack you on the ass.. SD

tambien -> RE: Etiquette question (6/25/2008 6:58:37 PM)
.

joyinslavery -> RE: Etiquette question (6/25/2008 7:18:18 PM)
I wanted to brush my teeth today but I got a bit distracted by internet porn. Is that wrong? Have fun.

Sylverdawn -> RE: Etiquette question (6/25/2008 7:43:27 PM)
Depends Darlin.. where you feeding my coin slot or some other Bitches.. winks..winks.. nudge nudge say no more.

joyinslavery -> RE: Etiquette question (6/25/2008 7:49:39 PM)
I can say plenty... depends on whether the person I'm talking to has something interesting to say BUT I must admit to an unhealty preoccupation. I'm chalking it up to an illness. Have fun.

Sylverdawn -> RE: Etiquette question (6/25/2008 9:19:04 PM)
take two aspirin and call me in the morning..

joyinslavery -> RE: Etiquette question (6/25/2008 9:30:21 PM)
No problem. So long as what you have is prescription strenght or better. Have fun.

Sylverdawn -> RE: Etiquette question (6/26/2008 5:14:38 AM)
chuckles.. Ive got what you need...winks Having fun

DiurnalVampire -> RE: Etiquette question (6/26/2008 5:30:41 AM)
Be polite is about the only universal answer you can get. You arent going to find a one size fits all ettiquite rule for every dominant female. You have gotten responses from some here who are high protocol and expect exacting rules and there are some like me who dont even care if you use a title as long as you are polite and spell out your words. Correct spelling and use of sentences tend to go far as well, fairly universally. I have never met a dominant that prefered netspeak. If you want an opener that proves you read their profile, then look through and see if they have a prefered address in there. If not, the screen name usually works, and a mention that since you didnt see a prefered title in the profile, you will wait to see what they'd like to be addressed as. Proper ettiquite also dictates that you do not beg to serve in the initial email, unless the profile has stated they want you to. Essentially, all proper ettiquite can be gleened from the profiles, so read and see what they are steering you to. DV

SurrenderForMe -> RE: Etiquette question (6/26/2008 8:57:17 PM)
The only rule I follow on that is common courtesy. Approaching a stranger, you want to give the best real impression that you can. I do take off points for grammar. [8\|]

mantis65 -> RE: Etiquette question (6/26/2008 11:42:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RedMagic1 quote: ORIGINAL: jonathan Jeez, it's not physics, the everything theory, it's kink. What you refer to is General Unification Theory, reconciling of Einsteinian relativity with quantum mechanics. Poof. Just so you know, you demonstrated to me with this "correction" that you are a pseudo-intellectual poser. A "theory of everything" merges all gauge symmetries, hence is more comprehensive than the General Unification Theory you describe, hence at least presumably will be harder to achieve. (Wikipedia describes the difference well, for the geekily curious. Keith Devlin's book The Millenium Problems includes a lay introduction to gauge theory, for anyone who is even nerdier.) It's cool with me if someone doesn't know the difference, and it's even cooler if someone doesn't care about the difference. Use the anonymity of a message board to act like an expert when you don't know shit? I'm calling you on it. That maybe true but the actual answer to Life, the universe and everything is 42

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125