RE: Music appreciation (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Alumbrado -> RE: Music appreciation (6/22/2008 8:30:24 PM)

Speaking of synthesizer sounding intros.....


http://www.chordstrike.com/2008/06/moog-introduces.html




SwPuno -> RE: Music appreciation (6/22/2008 8:33:02 PM)

I would also say a definite "not always".  I was happy to see and agree with the "Gone in 60 Seconds" example as I thought I was one of the few that saw the original.  It had one of the most awesome car chases I had ever seen (although, admittedly, I was around 12 at the time and had a smaller frame of reference) and the remake looked like a typical Hollywood overdone remake mess so I didn't even try that one, even though I generally like Nicolas Cage.  I'm sure there are at least a couple of remakes that do actually improve on the original movie, though.  I think many are saying that right now about the new "Incredible Hulk" even though that is a remake of a film made only 4 years ago (I haven't seen either yet).

As for music, though, I think there is a much higher percentage where the remake can be as good, or in some cases, better than the original.  Sometimes it is a fairly faithful remake that sounds good just because of the aforementioned better recording or just hearing a different voice and band give it a different feel.  A couple of examples are the Smithereens covers of the Who's "The Seeker", Ringo Starr's "It Don't Come Easy", the Red Hot Chili Pepper's "Higher Ground", Lenny Kravitz' "American Woman", Elton John's "Pinball Wizard", and one that I just found out was a cover (see, I'm not THAT old), Soft Cell's "Tainted Love" (I already knew "Where Did Our Love Go?" was a cover).

Sometimes a song can be covered in a new way by just flipping the sex (and sometimes attitude) of the lead singer.  Pat Benatar had some success with this with "Just Like Me" and, especially "I Need A Lover".   Tori Amos and Patti Smith, among others, have done some others.

What I really like, however, is when a musician or group takes a song and takes it in a new direction, making you rethink the song or hear it in an all new way.  Now on some occasions this can result in a really baaad cover song (which could be a fun separate thread).  But when it works it can sometimes seem like the original version was just a rough blueprint sketch for what the song could or was meant to become.  My leading examples of that are the earlier mentioned Joe Cocker version of "With A Little Help From My Friends" vs. the Beatles, Hendrix version of "All Along the Watchtower" vs. Bob Dylan's.  "Wooden Ships" by CSN is another that pops into mind as being substantially different than Jefferson Airplane's original, and I'm sure this thread will produce many others.  If you like this type of cover, you might want to check out "If I Were A Carpenter", which has a few interesting covers of songs by The Carpenters, believe it or not.  One was played and discussed briefly in last year's film "Juno".

Oh, and before I forget, Hayseed Dixie also does some fun and interesting covers of many rock and pop hits in a bluegrass style, complete with countryfied vocals.

Puno









slvemike4u -> RE: Music appreciation (6/23/2008 8:59:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

LOL! I seem to recall an interview with Townsend (GP maybe?) after Moon's death where he said they were flooded by so many people wanting to be their new drummer, that they started answering the phone calls 'What? We just managed to get rid of the last one, why would we want another???'
Replacing Moon ,no matter how improbable,made sense in that they were still a vibrant band making new albums and such.Performing what was it the night or 2 nights after Townsend was found dead in a Vegas hotel room that was just crass...
This thread left me with an irrefutable argument for shutting down the computer once drowsiness arives,or at the least to stop posting.Driving back from getting my morning coffee it struck me that I had killed off the wrong member of the Who last night,in my sleep deprived version I had Mr. Townsend dead in a Vegas hotel room rather than bassist extrodinaire Mr. Entwhistle...My apologies to Pete's family for any grief caused by my stupidity




Termyn8or -> RE: Music appreciation (6/23/2008 9:56:44 AM)

Finally someone else who saw the original Gone In Sixty Seconds ! I had to crack up at the end, when he drives the beat up Mustang into the car wash and gets away with one in good condition. It's just the sociopath in me.

I also prefer StevieWonder's version of Higher Ground, although I do not even know if that is the original. But the relatively sparse accompaniment to the vocals along with the strong bassline gave it certain character.

And as far as recorsing methods go, I would tend to agree when it comes to vinyl and tapes, but the masters are of much better quality, and even what they call an AAD recording is very much better than vinyl, at least in the long run. If you have equipment like I had a brand new LP would sound as good as a CD, that is until the inevitable pop or tick finds it's way in, plus it wears out every time you play it no matter how expensive your cartridge and turntable. Magnetic tape actually erases just a little bit every time it is played as well.

But the masters are quite good, and when they can get their hands on the original 15 or 30 ips 8, 12 or 16 track masters, then they are remixed right into a digital recorder and they call that recording an ADD, there is usually less hiss and a bit better dynamic range. Also alot less compression is used.

OK, some of it does not sound so good. But in most cases it sounds very good. My speakers have the smoothest frequency response I have ever heard, and it is an ongoing thing with me to relisten to this old stuff. Some of it amazes me.

I got my hands on an obscure little piece known as Music To Trim Your Tree By, a collection of Christmas songs produced in the 1960s. I ripped that one myself using an Audio Technika AT13Ea, which is a hyper-hyper eliptical. A seriously good and expensive cartridge, on par with Ortofans and things like that. That LP was one of the few on which I could not hear the master tape start. It also used ALOT of dynamic range, the most I have ever heard on an LP. Too bad I couldn't hear it that way decades ago. Just to note, just about every piece on it was a remake of course.

Another one that was rough on the vinyl was Queen - Get Down Make Love.

Interesting to note, when they make a purely digital recording they have to add hiss, it is called dither. If you remember the "golden ears" audiophiles complaining about the sound of CDs, well that's why dither is used. It has to do with the fact that a digital recording has more distortion at low levels. The dither smooths out the quantization process, eliminating most of the distorion.

Not wanting to get too technical though, remember how Led Zepplin's Gallows Pole seemed not to have any bass ? Well I am here to tellya, it has bass. Nice low bass, and you won't hear it unless you have a digital recording of it.

Anyway, to get back on track here, the subject was to be about the material, not the equipment, but I thought it worth mentioning. I have an exceedingly diverse collection, many people have more songs than I, but I an sure I have things they don't even in collections five times the size of mine. I got it all from P2P, and I am a very competent searcher. I have, along the way found that many things, even from the sixties or even fifties that were actually remakes of pieces from the thirties or fourties.

I think in many cases if you hear a remake first, before hearing the original you might prefer the remake to the original. Is that possibly because your mind has set up a preconcieved notion of what it is supposed to sound like ? I think this likely.

I really like acoustic instruments and orchestras, but I don't like those nine hour long pieces that put you to sleep. Tell you what I would like to hear, would be for an orchestra to take on a hard rock piece. For example I would love to hear Elmer Bernstein with a full blown orchestra doing something like Ted Nugent's Stranglehold. I can only imagine the possibilities, but I am sure they are many.

And sometimes omission of certain parts can be interesting. I happened across a recording of Elton John's Madman Across The Water, which seemed to me to be a practice session for a concert, without the orchestra. The lead was acoustic of course and they just had a bass, electric backup guitar and I think a piano. Drums of course. Very interesting sound. More pure.

I think in the newer music they tend to make it too "busy" for lack of a better word.

Enough for now, this was supposed to be a fast reply. Some fast reply eh ?

Any opinions bring them on.

T




stella41b -> RE: Music appreciation (6/23/2008 11:44:17 AM)

I'm also a traditionalist, but there are some exceptions. Two which readily come to mind are Oasis 'My Generation' and Madonna's version of 'American Pie'. Others that come to mind as I think about it are Pet Shop Boys 'Where The Streets Have No Name' and with one of my favourite genres - reggae - doesn't matter if it's dance hall, old skool, roots, or lover's rock. Reggae is full of cover versions, which contrast or better the original. But please don't take my word for it, but feel free to check out a few examples I give below:

The Animals 'House of the Rising Sun' sung by Gregory Isaacs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQnyunGnvwY&feature=related

Ken Boothe's version of Bread's 'Everything I Own'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyIDFEvVqhE

John Lennon's 'Watching The Wheels' by The Samples
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORzQYzdjr8k

Lionel Richie's 'Stuck On You' by Trevor Walters
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EJ3Xy7l_1Y&feature=related

'Take Me Home Country Roads' by Toots and the Maytals
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UA3SWdJwWNA

The Cars 'Drive' covered by Ziggy Marley
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmz73THWeYo

From the Dark Side of the Moon album, Pink Floyd's 'Time' covered by the Easy Star All Stars
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lz7OFW3p1C8&feature=related

Marcia Griffiths covering Roberta Flack's 'The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAcxsN-MUAY&feature=related

..and also her cover of Freda Payne's 'Band of Gold'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHAQprcZSqA&feature=related

Nicky Thomas's version of Brook Benton's 'Rainy Night in Georgia'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRH0VByxjOA&feature=related

The Motown classic 'You Keep Me Hanging On' by Ken Boothe
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q36D6d5-0iI

When reggae artists cover each other I sometimes have a problem. I still can't decide which version of '54 46 Was My Number' I prefer

The original by Toots and the Maytals
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhjBiZSfM08

..or the cover by Aswad
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcHVPFrsx9o&feature=related




Termyn8or -> RE: Music appreciation (6/23/2008 10:51:55 PM)

Well stella, I am blunt, and now is no time to change. I don't like any of them. I am not saying I dislike them, but I do not prefer them. So you like reggae then. Fine and good, I am not all that partial to it and the sequence you provided seems to have illuminated the reason in my mind.

It is limited to certain beats. I would be jamming every Saturday night if not for a drummer who can't learn new beats. In other words it all sounds the same. We try totally different riffs and this guy just tries to apply the same beat. So we stopped.

If you like reggae, fine, but I was never partial to it. To me, they are bastardizing songs by aplying the same style and rythym to them all. If I am to listen to reggae I would rather hear music that is composed and perfomed in that genre, meant for the style.

As I mentioned before, perhaps it is because I have a preconcieved style in my mind that I think these songs should be played in, but I think it is more than that. Not that I hate reggae, but to take old songs and do that to them does nothing for me. Of course if they were redone in a heavy metal style I would probably say the same thing, even though I like heavy metal.

For example I mentioned that I think it would be awesome if Bernstein took the whole crew and did Stanglehold. But then I like Judas Preist - You Got Another Thing Coming, but I would not have the desitre to hear an orchestra play that. Although it could be good, it would take some work I think, and so would Stranglehold.

I think the reggae is too limited as a style myself. If you like the style that is fine. There are a couple of reggae songs I like, but they were not remakes, they were written in the genre, and played in the style in which they were intended to be.

And hold on to your hats folks because I am about to admit to something that is not quite logical about me !

I would not like to hear a classical piece trying to be emulated by a rock band. Even though I like rock, as well as rock and roll, there are certain things they are not meant to do. For example ACDC doing Ravel's Bolero would be a total washout. I do make an exception for Roll Over Beethoven by ELO, but that is one of the very few.

And even the other way around, like with an orchestra doing Stranglehold, I don't mean the written music, I mean how they really played it, on the version that sold. All the riffs and leads, some of which were made up, pick them up and have whatever section play them.

For example on a tune like Stranglehold, I would start with tubas, basses and violas or something like that. Then bring in french horns and muted trumpets playing the main guitar, the opener in tandem. Then they split and the muted trumpets and trombones actually, then play the lead guitar part. They must be very good musicians to do it in the first place. And you use more than one of course, so in that time in the original hit, when they turned on the echo machine, as the composer arrainger you would just write each part, and of course have the section practice together to get it together. Of course there are kettle drums, and there will have to be snares. And you will need, if you want to have "realism"or something like that, there should be some powerful cymbal sections on each side, because of how they mixed the original. Not to be outdone so to speak. They need to practice together, on opposite sides of the stage.

When you are talking about professional musicians who are good enough to be in an orchestra, instead of delegated to the role of a millionaire rock star, they will figure it out. You might be surprised at how little some of them make, considering the qualifications.

It takes many many years to even understand what those qualifications are. Then the pay scale. Like football in a way, you got first string, second string and third. That is based on your skill level. Playing multiple instruments helps. Alot of interaction with the conductor/arrainger is a big plus, if he'll have you. You can become the leader in a way of the violin or oboe or who knows section, which is a boost in pay. And of course a soloist makes more.

There is alot to an orchestra, it is fascinating to me. It is something I can explore without being bombarded with all the nasty happenings in the world. And that is good because I am starting not to care. I can't change shit and I got one life to live.

Music is not a necessity, although it is nice to have. It can enlighten, imspire or bring some people to their knees.

So if you like reggae, listen to some, by all means, but then listen to my first link. In some of that music the notes are the same. (HA only the chords have been changed to protect the plageurizers, see info on the web about the US TV show Dragnet for the specific reference that makes the joke work)

Rock bands are limited, hillbilly bands are limited, reggae bands are limited, it is all limited.

Enough for now, later.

T




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125