RE: Psycho bitch (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message

TheHeretic -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 5:50:21 PM)

       Oh Hell, Termy, the ending is as predictable as an episode of Gilligan's Island, but there might be some good times along the way.  Seems to me the thing has to run it's course.

       Just remember your Sancho obligations, and leave a couple nice, new shirts in the closet for when he gets out.



candystripper -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 5:56:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: YourhandMyAss

OP Do you realize that over half your posts make no sense at all, and you come across as on drugs or something when you post?


Termy writes in his own unique style.  He uses wit, satire, sarcasm and methaphor like no one I've ever known.  His posts are gems.
 
You're missing one of the best contributors to the boards.  Your loss, YourhandMyAss.

candystripper



kc692 -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 6:12:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: candystripper

If her 'olman' has been locked up for any length of time, there's a goodly chance he's infected with HIV. 
 

candystripper


Sheesh, generalize much??????? I dont think the statistics would show that the majority of people in prison have HIV, but I'm sure you got that factoid from somewhere, dincha?



candystripper -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 7:05:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kc692

quote:

ORIGINAL: candystripper

If her 'olman' has been locked up for any length of time, there's a goodly chance he's infected with HIV. 
 

candystripper


Sheesh, generalize much??????? I dont think the statistics would show that the majority of people in prison have HIV, but I'm sure you got that factoid from somewhere, dincha?


Okay, lemme see if I can back that up.

quote:

According to Correctional Services Canada (CSC) Surveillance Data from June, 2000, approximately two-percent of federal inmates are HIV-positive; up from the one percent reported in 19951. This number does not include those men who have not disclosed their HIV status to prison officials; or those who are HIV-positive but have not been tested for the virus. The rates of HIV infection among men in Canadian prisons is increasing and reflects trends among certain groups outside of prisons, for example among injection drug users.

While in prison there are several activities behaviours that men can and sometimes do engage in that put them at risk for HIV infection. These activities include sharing needles and other drug injection equipment; tattooing (which also involves sharing needles) and engaging in unprotected sex.


http://www.cdnaids.ca/web/backgrnd.nsf/pages/cas-gen-0104

quote:

HIV infection rates are estimated to be nearly 10 times higher among federal and provincial inmates in Canada than in the general population. Higher rates of infection among inmate populations are often the result of offenders' histories of participating in high-risk behaviours, such as injection drug use and unprotected sex, behaviours which some offenders continue to engage in while incarcerated. Recent evidence indicates that HIV infection rates are more than twice as high among female inmates than male inmates.


http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/aids-sida/info/2_e.html

quote:

Although high-risk behaviors are more common in the community than in the incarcerated setting for this study group, incarcerated populations represent a high-risk group for whom access to prevention messages is limited.


http://www.jaids.org/pt/re/jaids/abstract.00126334-200008010-00014.htm;jsessionid=LpPJgCD6hnJSKH8pTg1BTN1CKSL7vtdP213PVpDYpswhcnGKRV5y!-1328441329!181195629!8091!-1

quote:

The HIV infection rate in our state correctional facilities is many times higher than in the general population. With the average duration of incarceration being just 2 years, HIV infections in our state correctional facilities quickly spread to communities on the outside with high incarceration rates. Sadly, the Governor’s veto of condoms in prison will result in thousands of people both inside and outside of prison being infected with HIV at a staggeringly high cost in both human lives and taxpayer dollars,” said Assemblyman Koretz.


http://www.californiachronicle.com/articles/50890

I said 'there was a goodly chance' the olman had been infected.
 
I did not say 'the majority of male prisoners in America have HIV'.  That statement is untrue. 
 
The fact is, men in prison acquire HIV infections and other stds at rates higher than some portions of the general population.
 
I wanted to altert Termy to a risk he might not have considered.  He's too valuable to lose.

Satisfied?
 
candystripper



Thadius -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 7:08:37 PM)

So 2% equates to a "goodly chance"?



LadyRainfire -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 7:16:46 PM)

[8|] And where does using Canadian statistics in reference to the Canadian prison system from 2000 reference the situation in US prisons? The OP doesn't reference Canada in any way in his original post and his profile states that he's in Ohio, United States. The only stated statistic, in the first reference, states that there are 2% HIV positive incarcerated males as of 2000 in Canadian prisons. The others are statements and commentaries, not hard facts. 



candystripper -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 7:18:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

So 2% equates to a "goodly chance"?


Thadius, please try and read more carefully.  The report is from 2000.  They found a 100% increase in the rate of infection over 1995.
 
If you read the cited materials yourself, you will see that male prison populatons have been identified as an emerging high-risk group for HIV infection who often spread that infection to the general population after release.
 
The reasons given include:
 
* Homosexual contact among prisoners.
 
* Tatooing.
 
* Illegal drug use involving shared needles.
 
* Limited access to educational and prevention info.

candystripper



DomAviator -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 7:28:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: candystripper


If you read the cited materials yourself, you will see that male prison populatons have been identified as an emerging high-risk group for HIV infection who often spread that infection to the genral population after release.
 
candystripper


And that high risk behavior is what gets most male , and female, imates into prison in the first place. Its hardly fair to say that an IV drug using crackhouse dwelling prosititute became infected in the prison... LOL Sort seeks sort...

However, I wouldn't fuck a con's woman just because they are dirtbags - not for fear of what I might contract. I wouldnt do a convicts woman for the same reason I dont eat out of my dogs bowl or drink water from my toilet... As for STD's I cover my pitot tube before I poke any strange - unless of course its "known clean and innocent". (Shit my last girlfriend knew so little about sex that she didnt realize the applicator comes out after you put the tampon in! I still remember her complaing about how uncomforable they were and how she couldnt wear pants because of how it made her underwear tent out.. LOL)

AIDs / HIV / HEP C aside, I dont want that class of people in my house - casing my shit so they know where to rob when the ol man gets out and needs a fix.....



Thadius -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 7:37:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: candystripper

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

So 2% equates to a "goodly chance"?


Thadius, please try and read more carefully.  The report is from 2000.  They found a 100% increase in the rate of infection over 1995.
 
If you read the cited materials yourself, you will see that male prison populatons have been identified as an emerging high-risk group for HIV infection who often spread that infection to the genral population after release.
 
candystripper


I did read what you provided.  That 100% increase you are pointing to occurred over a 5 year period.  So even if we opened up the flood gates and assumed that it continued at a fast rate of growth, the Canadian prisons are at maybe 5% infection rates?  Also, the quoted links you provide clearly state that the infection rate is twice as high for female inmates.  While I will concede that there are activities that can increase the risk while in prison, I don't believe that a junky sharing needles on the streets is any less at risk as one in prison, as neither one cares all that much for their own health and well being.

Your logic still seems flawed, as you are making the assumption that the olman is even taking part in risky behaviours. I would believe it more likely that he MIGHT be at more risk of contracting a different STD than he would to be infected with HIV.  Then again I can throw around opinions and speculation just like everybody else, and that is all a claim that "olman has a goodly chance of being infected with HIV".



kc692 -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 7:39:38 PM)

Nope, actually, no offense, but Im not satisfied. 

The fact is, men in prison acquire HIV infections and other stds at rates higher than some portions of the general population
quote:

Although high-risk behaviors are more common in the community than in the incarcerated setting for this study group,
 


quote:

According to Correctional Services Canada (CSC) Surveillance Data from June, 2000, approximately two-percent of federal inmates are HIV-positive; up from the one percent reported in 19951



Goodly, although NOT a real word, I'm assuming means the chances are high he will get it, which means by default you must think it is rampant which also translates into the majority, otherwise, it would be really easy to avoid, no?

The number 2 percent and the first statement I took from your very own quotes negates your statement.





kc692 -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 7:43:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: candystripper

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

So 2% equates to a "goodly chance"?


Thadius, please try and read more carefully.  The report is from 2000.  They found a 100% increase in the rate of infection over 1995.
 
If you read the cited materials yourself, you will see that male prison populatons have been identified as an emerging high-risk group for HIV infection who often spread that infection to the general population after release.
 
The reasons given include:
 
* Homosexual contact among prisoners.
 
* Tatooing.
 
* Illegal drug use involving shared needles.
 
* Limited access to educational and prevention info.

candystripper


So, if 2% is 100%  increase from 1995 to 2000, then they are at,what about 6%?  Still not a "goodly" portion of the population, and as others have pointed out, only factual in Canada (and the extrapolation of increase percentage wise was figured in your favor, and is still only at about 6%, and total conjecture)

Still not a high chance, as I said the facts you pointed out, said that the general population incindence was higher.  Maybe according to your logic, that would mean that he stands a more goodly chance of getting it on the outside, after all that is what your statistics state.

edited to add:  I see someone else beat me to the extrapolation of percentages.

Termy, I apologize I did not mean to derail your thread, I just got caught up in ludicrousness. Sorry again....





Alumbrado -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 7:48:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kc692

Goodly, although NOT a real word, I'm assuming means the chances are high...



Errrk??  Not a real word?  What kind is it?

good·ly [image]http://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.png[/image]–adjective, -li·er, -li·est.



1.
of good or substantial size, amount, etc.: a goodly sum.
Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/goodly



kc692 -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 7:51:39 PM)

K, I stand corrected, goodly just reminds me of olden days and didnt realize it was still used.......thanks for the education.



Alumbrado -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 7:59:15 PM)

Oh, if they took away archaic words, my vocabulary would suffer greatly...[;)]



spanklette -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 8:10:24 PM)

~FR~
 
In the scheme of things, I don't really think it matters if the person kicking your ass has HIV.



kc692 -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 8:14:24 PM)

I just spurted liquid out of my nose, dammit, !!![sm=mop.gif]



DDraigeuraid -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 8:27:47 PM)

Term, run away.  She reminds me of the psychobitch I was involved with about 8 years ago.  The sex was great, but she was so psycho.  Last time I ever saw her she was being led out of the house in handcuffs.  I thank my lucky stars or karma or whatever that I was not being led out in handcuffs.  Remember, the sex is the easy part.
Dragon (hope she's not from the Tulsa area)



spanklette -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 8:33:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kc692

I just spurted liquid out of my nose, dammit, !!![sm=mop.gif]


Then you should probably know that I'm related to approximately 2% of the inmate population in the United States...[:D]



kittinSol -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 8:34:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomAviator

However, I wouldn't fuck a con's woman just because they are dirtbags - not for fear of what I might contract. I wouldnt do a convicts woman for the same reason I dont eat out of my dogs bowl or drink water from my toilet...



I love how women are compared to domestic fixtures - particularly appreciated is the comparison to toilets. Keep it up!



DomAviator -> RE: Psycho bitch (6/30/2008 8:53:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomAviator

However, I wouldn't fuck a con's woman just because they are dirtbags - not for fear of what I might contract. I wouldnt do a convicts woman for the same reason I dont eat out of my dogs bowl or drink water from my toilet...



I love how women are compared to domestic fixtures - particularly appreciated is the comparison to toilets. Keep it up!


Not a problem happy to help... If you notice, that didnt say "all women" it said "Convict's woman"... I dont know about overthere in Franceland or Europa or from whence thou hailed - but just an FYI and strictly for the purposes of easing your transition to life in these here United States, there is a stigma attached to being a con in the USA.

It is pretty universal, and varies in severity by state, but as a general rule - cons cant vote, cant get a job worth a shit, cant join most organizations (for example several of the groups I belong to fingerprint you and require a police record check), they have to register with a PO who can search them, toss their home, hand them a cup to piss in, etc any time without a warrant or probable cause. If anything happens they are rounded up for questioning. They cant cross a county line in Texas without getting written permission, have to register with the police chief / sherrif ,etc... In many places there are restrictions where they can live - for example NOT in my community at all. (Thats not "the law" because that would be unconstitutioal but thats the way it is, because thanks to some smart lawyers who sat down with some GIS software when drafting the ordinance, there is essentially no place in my community that actually meets the distance requirement from schools, playgrounds, parks, houses of worship, gun stores, places licensed to serve alcohol, etc... [:D]) We have lots and lots of restrictions on Cons, all intended to make them feel very unwelcome...

Cons are kind of "persona non gratis" in most nice parts of the USA soooooooo on the dating standpoint, they dont exactly get the belles of the ball.... Sort seeks sort, and hence the toilet reference...  



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875