quote:

So quit ya Friken Bitchen and give up a hug.......Freedom of speech is never free.....ask any Vet.

quote:

Posting while angry?? True, I was non-plussed at IB's uncharacteristic "barracking from the bleachers" but I've generally had nothing but fun in this thread. Your "anger" comment proves nothing more than the obvious, that you don't know me at all - and for my part, you have my sincere regrets and apologies for what I hope is nothing more than an unfortunate misunderstanding.

Focus.

quote:

I kinda been outta da loop on this one, but I do know one thing. The Moderator's here are the most tolerant of any site you will ever join......trust me.
I've been banned from every bar, every site and every Brothel from coast to coast, but here, I have only had my hand slapped........Hard..........twice! Yet, I still post.

So quit ya Friken Bitchen and give up a hug.......Freedom of speech is never free.....ask any Vet.

Peace, kevin/fastlane

quote:

ORIGINAL: SDsbiatch

If that were truly the case all of those who were slinging the sticky stuff would have given there marching orders. That did not happen. All breached the TOS. Go Figure.

quote:

ORIGINAL: IronBear

I can remember going down this path a couple of months ago (or so it seems) when an Aussie was sin binned and yet those who had baited him and flamed him appeared to get off Scot-free. Now please take note I said APPEARED to get off Scot-free. (Remember this salient point as I may test you on this at a later date). Any of us who live in Aussie know how protective of our own as the Kiwis are about their own and we both still have the other’s back (Now Hear This! Y’all leave the Kiwis alone. By right of nationality Aussies have the God given right to try to bash the shit out of the Kiwis and they us). The point is, I did notice that although one or two people appear to have immunity, I have noticed that after a bout of flaming, they do pull their heads in and keep the peace until some one punched their buttons. I don know, not being privy to the Secret Mod Councils, but I’d warrant a few private warnings are issued and people take heed. Now us decedents of the Anzacs, tend to be a bloody independent mob who has more than a little trouble in taking notice of official warnings (Just look at how many get regular rides in the paddy wagon from the rubbity on a Saturday night) so I can understand why it may seem that the Aussie/NZ membership of CM appears to be targeted for sin binning or worse. Some of you remember my concerns as to what appeared to be CM being a US site with non US Citizens being treated as second class members. I do not believe that is the case and the fact that the majority of (at least active) members are US residence, but look at the population figures and that shouldn’t surprise you.

I have found that when I have contacted the Mods about what I’ve seen as injustices, they have replied to me promptly and been prepared to discuss the matter with me. The bottom line is folks, this is a free site and since you are not forced to remain here or asked to pay a fee for using the site we do not have a leg to stand on even if the Mods wished to parade naked on a daily basis…. End result, why don';t you can the cyber-fascist state concept, that went out in the post 60's and only shows a lack of maturity and may indicate the precence of a "professional" stirer or rabble rouser more commonly found in anti establishment protestors.

quote:

ORIGINAL: nelbot

When someone sends a nasty or scathing email to someone else criticizing them for and disagreing with their profile and then immediately blocks the person from responding, even respectfully, to their attack; it shows a lack of courage and inability to accept responsibility for ones actions. When that person attacking is a self-purported dominant, who then runs and hides from their own words by blocking the attacked party, it makes a strong statement about their worthiness of the title 'Master'. When an unprovoked attack is made on someone else for no other reason than because they don't like the person's profile, and then such an attacker hides behind the safety of blocking the recipient from responding it shows a lack of responsibility for ones actions and poor character. When that person claims that they are a dominant, it serves as an example of the false faces and disrespectful and irresponsible characters that show themselves on Collar Me, no less so than if the attacker were a submissive but from a dominant that theoretically aspires to live by a higher code of ethics and responsibility than the vanilla world, it is the freudian slip of their true character showing. Does anyone agree on this?