Duskwolf -> RE: Trained vs. Untrained (7/5/2008 1:35:37 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Focus50 Blame it all on LuckyAlbatross; she's usually the skilled and helpful one who posts a bunch of links to previous, similar questions. lol Me, I've had relationships with previously experienced and "first day" newbie fem/subs. Since I'm one of the (apparently) few who actually enjoys teaching my girl what she needs to know, the less experience, the better - IMO. But no, I'd never reject a sub just because she's served others for years previous, either. As celticlord implied, *anyone* new to me doesn't know what *I* desire or expect. The newbie takes longer to train and is generally nervous and clumsy with it, as is normal for anyone confronting something new. And I confess I take some delight in that awkwardness, particularly how they're usually obsessed with not wanting to fail or displease me. Of course, they don't know it's impossible not to please me if they're trying their best; I just don't mention that at the time.... ;-) The experienced sub still doesn't know what I require, but their previous experience usually ensures they're not nearly as nervous with it - which takes some of the edge off in comparison. But as we say in Oz, "it's all good", because I still like the training phase regardless.... Focus. Again, I find myself agreeing with Celticlord and Focus... Everyone who comes to you is inexperienced, because they don't know YOU... And training them to know you and what your expectations are should be part of the fun. :D I also took amusement from the Aussie saying too, one I hear almost daily from my friends. :)
|
|
|
|