hisannabelle -> RE: Britain accepting Sharia law? (7/3/2008 5:49:52 PM)
|
greetings cyberdude, there are two schools of thought on this - that culturally appropriate laws can be used for those of different religions (for example, britain already has separate systems for jews who choose to use them, to my knowledge) in certain cases (within islam, this makes sense especially regarding marriage and finance as western courts generally do not have a family law system as there is in islam and islamic financial law is very different). and then of course there are those who believe the same laws should be applied equally in all cases, all across the board, regardless of whether they are culturally appropriate. in my experience, this leaves muslims - especially muslim women in the case of marriage - reliant on their own social communities to try to enforce the rights accorded to them under islamic law, which in many cases turns out badly. ultimately i think these statements are the most important: quote:
In his speech at an East London mosque, Lord Phillips signalled approval of sharia principles as long as punishments - and divorce rulings - complied with the law of the land. Lord Phillips said: 'Those who are in dispute are free to subject it to mediation or to agree that it shall be resolved by a chosen arbitrator. There is no reason why principles of sharia law or any other religious code should not be the basis for mediation or other forms of dispute resolution.' Lord Phillips said that any sanctions must be 'drawn from the laws of England and Wales'. Severe physical punishment - he mentioned stoning, flogging or amputating hands - is 'out of the question' in Britain, he added. respectfully,a'ishah.
|
|
|
|