DomAviator
Posts: 1253
Joined: 4/22/2008 Status: offline
|
If Shanahan claims he "never confronted" the homosexual issue in his 35 year Navy career he is so full of shit that his eyes are brown. He says "everyone was living a big lie" and "commanders were looking the other way" HMMMMMM, that sounds a lot like he confronted it didnt he? I dont know where the Admiral was but during my Navy career I saw homosexuality being a VERY big issue from the day I arrived in Pensacola! I hadnt even made it to Building 633 to check in when I encountered a gunney in some guys face screaming "YOU A FAGGOT BOY??? YOU SOME KIND OF POLE SMOKING FAGGOT??? YOU WANNA SUCK MY COCK PUSSY???" It became more "anti gay" (note I didnt say "homophobic", they arent afraid of gays they just want to kill them) from there... I saw it all, from a soft spoken shy religious guy mistakenly believed to be gay persecuted, pranked, blanket partied, etc to official stake outs of gay bars with telephoto lenses looking for the "queers among us". After DADT the official active hunting stopped - but the enlisted still had a zero tolerance policy and conducted their own private witch hunts and so did many of the senior officers. I dont know where the hell this Admiral was, or what agenda he is pushing, but the Navy is not a good place to be gay. The flight deck of an aircraft carrier is one of the most dangerous work environments on earth, and the guys whether actually gay or simply believed to be gay tend to have an inordinately high number of close calls. Rarely anything so obvious that anyone can ever prove it, but I have on many occassions suspected that various close calls were a warning to certain people. It was certainly a morale issue, especially for the wrongly accused, and a discipline issue. I know of an O-6 who made discreet inquiries all the way back to OCS, through the training squadrons, through the fleet replacement squadrons etc looking for anyone who had any carnal knowledge about a particular female NFO that he felt had eaten more pussy than him. DADT not withstanding, some of the old salts were constantly on the hunt - especially for lesbians as they resented the idea of women in Naval Aviation more than you coud imagine so if you could prove she was "a dyke" you could get "the split tailed slit licker" out of the squadron. (Incidentally, these very conversations were in and of themselves a violation of Article 133 "Conduct Unbecoming" but that goes out the widow when you have an old salt with a bird on his collar hunting for wild lesbians!) Even that gun turrert explosion on the USS Iowa was officially pinned on suspected homosexuals, until they ultimately reversed themselves and admitted it was static electricity, over ramming, and poor training. So, the article is right in that DADT didnt do anything except end the official hunt - it didnt stop it, it just made it unofficial. However the "I never confronted the problem" is bullshit unless the Admiral never poked his head out of his office. Odd he didnt say "encountered". Sounds more like double speak - he didnt confront it, he just sat back and watched it happen and let it go on without confrontation... My advice to the gays, and I dont mean this in a discriminatory way, would be to stay the hell out of anything related to the Navy. Maybe the Air Force is more tolerant if you want to serve as they are the more genteel and refined of the services and tend to attact a less "rough" enlisted crowd. I cant speak of the Army or USCG but the Navy or Marines are not good places to be gay or suspected gay no matter what the official policy is as old traditions and prejudices die hard.
< Message edited by DomAviator -- 7/8/2008 12:14:47 AM >
|