cantilena
Posts: 224
Joined: 8/6/2007 Status: offline
|
I'm often slightly amused by some of the replies to these threads on so-called 'princesses'. There is almost always this indefinable tone of derision in some posts whenever this comes up that reads periously close to envy... sometimes even hatred. I don't mention it specifically at all, but rather it's a general statement - seems to happen whenever the topic comes up. Anyway, I think it's a little funny. People are multifaceted and rarely one-dimensional. Owning a sportscar (even a really, really nice one), getting pedicures, or even (gasp!!) having help 'round the house doesn't equate to being a whiney, spoiled, shallow narcissist. Are some out there? Sure. But it's general lack of understanding if one sees surface trappings as indicative of everything underneath... The characterization is actually as laughable as the one about women who grounge around the house and drive down yonder Walmart on Friday afternoons in a '79 beater Ford truck... Usually, there's more than meets the eye. Doms who own 'princesses' may indeed have entirely different definitions of service. Ones perhaps not entirely understood or comprehended by those who can't own one themselves. Just observations. These forums are fascinating at times. Lastly, I thought this was beautiful. Mature, and very beautiful: quote:
ORIGINAL: HeavansKeeper A princess is just as it sounds: A girl of good fortune, accustomed to a lifestyle. I'm sure there are dominants who like the sophistication and occasional disobedience of princesses. I would assume most of these "dominants" realize that they are spending a great deal of time and effort serving said princess. The other day My Pet and I were going to dinner. We couldn't decide where to go. It made clear that the responsibilities of being dominant involve serving, being a caretaker, sacrificing for the submissive. Whatever you want to call people, master, dominant, top, keeper, its just a title. In many ways, when My Pet became mine she took on a prince: A man who she tries hard to please at every whim, who she follows and stays with because of his demeanor, education, virtues, etc. I'd say wealth, but I'm a recent graduate =P. Reverse the genders and you get reversed titles. If she were male and I were female (Fem-Dom/Male-Sub) then "he" would be looking for a "princess." Edit to add: There are times when I treat mine like a princess (probably outweighed by times I treat her like a sex doll). I'll take her to nice dinners, and bubble bathes, and brushing her hair... I'll train her, cuddle her, read children's stories to her, explore boring bookstores with her (for her), etc... Do I consider myself serving her when I do these things? Yes, but that's not a problem. Would I consider myself any less dominant for serving? Of course not - they're mutually exclusive. I received an e-mail from a male submissive who wished to be an online houseboy . I told him I felt as if I would be doing the work of the relationship. In that respect, being a dominant is a lot of work, arguably more than the other side - arguably.
|