CallaFirestormBW
Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008 Status: offline
|
I don't know if I qualify as a "true" sadist or not by anyone else's definitions. What I -do- know is that, among the things I want to be able to do to/with at least some of my servants are things that are exceptionally painful and/or intense. For me, it is as much about my capacity to be able to inflict pain and watch that pain be embraced as it is to be served and make the rules. I will be in charge -- that is a given. Circumstances will certainly modify the manifestations of my command, but will not negate the reality that I am in command. I will also willingly, knowingly, and intentionally inflict pain, for the joy of seeing the intensity of the reaction. Neither of the above two situations are categorically inclusive. I'm perfectly happy to have someone that I control, and not inflict pain on hir because it's not hir 'thing', as long as xhe is a contributory member of the household. In the same way, I'm perfectly happy to top someone just for the opportunity to inflict pain, whether or not I have any long-lasting 'control' relationship with hir. However, of the two, the one that I miss most is when I don't have someone that I can pierce, cut, burn... Nothing I do will be without the other person's consent, though -- so perhaps that makes me less 'real'. Calla Firestorm
< Message edited by CallaFirestormBW -- 8/9/2008 7:57:47 AM >
_____________________________
*** Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!" "Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer
|