LadyRainfire -> RE: For those members who just love to rattle chains. (7/26/2008 1:02:18 PM)
|
[8|] Ok, while I don't think that what jlf said to the therapist was right, I have a question that sort of relates to the OP. If someone is living quietly by themselves, minding their own business and keeping to themselves, knowing they don't really like people, why do we expect them to get therapy and change? To "make happy" and conform to society's expectations? I'm not talking about the psycho killer who goes postal at the mall eventually, or the cult holed up with more arms and ammo than the local national guard that thinks everyone is out to get them but that quiet person 20 miles out of town that prefers their solitude and animals, is unfailingly polite and quiet when they do come into town, that type. I don't mind admitting that I'd rather spend time quietly at home with Lumus than go out to a club or bar. I also have very few close friends, though I know quite a few people. It's just the way I am. (Don't snicker too loud, holly, I can hear you from here!) So why do we think that people need to change if they don't like people? Unless they're a danger or a threat? Then I could understand.... Ideas? Thoughts? Edited for clarification (I hope.) That a person would seek help if needed (or wanted) to deal issues they may have. Or attend court-ordered therapy as required. However, as I've seen in the past personally, I've talked with one counselor who I went to deal with one issue and this therapist kept wanting to get off on other issues that she wanted to talk about. They weren't bugging me but she insisted that they just had to be and I needed to talk about them. She didn't like it when I kept saying that they weren't bugging me, that I had gotten over them. But to clarify my post, what I'm looking for, is discussion on why it's commonly thought that people should be social with everyone, that we all need to be social creatures, even those people who don't want to be. That those people who don't care for other people, who would prefer a solitary existance, are forced, or pressured, to conform to societal standards to co-exist in our modern day world. That when someone chooses to live an alternative lifestyle (and I'm not talking sexually) such as off the grid (homesteading) or retreating to a private property, it's kinda assumed that something is "wrong" with them. Oy, does this make more sense or does it just muddle it more? [8|] "The more I know about people, the more I love my cat." - bumper sticker
|
|
|
|