Alumbrado -> RE: What makes a great warrior? (8/2/2008 11:03:41 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MissIsis Ok, I admit, I do occasionally read the parts of people profiles that come up on the home page of this site. Today, I came across one that told a story. I hope the person doesn't mind me copying & pasting a part of it. I actually enjoyed most of it. It was creative & told a little about the person. Part of it read, "My father taught me to become a great warrior and the King of my people. We would conquer our enemies on their own land. On lands far away across treacherous seas. We would pillage and plunder. And take their women back to our land and make them our slaves. We would have our way with them on beds made of furs from wild animal hides next to our fires." My question is this: I understand about being a great warrior. I don't quite understand how a warrior can be so great if he goes to other people's lands & conquers them, & steals their land, & steals or destroys someone elses property. Where is the honor in forcing women to become slaves, and in forcing them to have sex with their captors? Isn't it much more honorable & worthy of the title of warrior, if he protects what is his, & the innocent? Isn't it much more honorable if he gets the woman to go to his bed willingly, rather than forcibly? Aren't these the traits of a warrior? If not, what are the traits of a great warrior? Thoughts anyone? That concept of 'warrior' comes from a period in civilization when tribal units such as clans were the prevalent building block of a society, and it pretty much meant that there were a bunch of people dead somewhere along the path...the successful warrior not being one of them. In a time when kings might actually be leading the charge against the enemy face to face, it had a certain connotation. As society and warfare evolved away from that time, warrior castes and warrior codes went away, and the concept of warrior greatness was supplanted by 'great generals' who were great at producing the requisite piles of dead bodies, just not face to face. Now it seems to be often used in the sense of 'if I actually lived in such and such an era, or on such and such a planet, I'd show them what a great warrior I was'. I wonder if the small handful of people today who actually make their only career and sole livelihood out of leaving behind dead opponents from numerous face to face encounters, actually talk like that.
|
|
|
|