pinnipedster -> RE: Is a 'cocktease' sexy in a femdom way? (8/22/2008 1:03:36 PM)
|
I'm not sure I've ever encountered a stereotypical "cocktease." In general I've heard it used as a pejorative by men to mean something like "hot woman who won't sleep with me." What I think it's *supposed* to mean is a woman who gets off on causing men to get excited, and then frustrating them. Yes, this can be sexy in a femdom way, if it's done in a deliberate, individualized fashion. I love the "teasing and denial" dynamic. A woman who went out of her way to get me excited frequently but only allowed me to actually cum rarely could probably get me to do just about anything. :) On the other hand, if she played the game of letting me believe she was interested in me sexually and that fulfillment was just around the corner in order to get me to spend money on her or do her favors, with no real intention of ever following through -- that I would consider unethical behavior, and I think the term "cocktease" in the negative sense would apply. (She's also be in for a major disappointment, given the state of my bank account...) It may seem tricky to define the difference, but I guess for me there's a consensual aspect to it. In the first example, the woman doing the teasing-and-denial *is* actually fulfilling one of my fantasies, so even if I never actually orgasm, there is gratification of a sort. In the second, she's just using me. It's sorf of like the difference between consensual S&M and spousal abuse: either can involve beating a partner, but there's a world of difference between them. Does that make sense?
|
|
|
|