|
ResidentSadist -> RE: Is it OK to share photos of used panties taken without owners consent? (8/7/2008 6:56:04 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Strongmindbody
quote:
ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist
quote:
ORIGINAL: Snailie
A guy in Norway messaged me....
This thread is a joke right?...
Hehe... Yes and no, RS. First, who knows or cares if the Norway bloke is real or a joke. But the question is valid. It reminds me of the sleazeballs here who go to the local beach market with a camera lens taped to a shoe, getting pics up the short skirts of young ladies who never know they area about to be instant internet wank fodder. When one of these guys got caught, the general market consensus for non-consensual photos was to beat the tar out of him. Can't say that I disagree. Slimy is slimy, IMHO.
So for me, the question isn't about the photos. That's a big, "Who cares?" - kind of like saying who cares if somebody gets a stiffie looking at a hot pic of Claudia Schiffer. It's just a photo (but, but , mmmmm). The larger question is whether a fetishist who gets off on using his own unwitting girlfriend to satisfy his need is overstepping some sort of boundary. Since this is a girlfriend, I say he has some kind of obligation here, associated with a thing we like to call honesty.
Yeah, a thread about used panty pics turns to discourse on ethics. Gotta love it!
Ethics... you're joking right? ok... you're not. Well, the gods love comedy so here goes.
-=Sum in up fast=-
Unless the Camera wielding boyfriend has signed or verbally agreed to a nondisclosure agreement regarding her panties, he is legally and morally able to take as many photographs as he wants and do what you will with them.
Unless the panties have a copy right notice posted on them saying that you may not reproduce them or their image without express written permission, he can do what he wants to with them and is under no moral or legal obligation to inform either the manufacture of the panties or the owner.
-=Premise=-
Being that we live in a day and age where it takes more than a lifetime for a one man to learn all of the laws of man, I would say that we pretty much have a law for every morality you could think of at this point in time… including presidential blow jobs, panties and cum stained blue dresses.
I feel it is safe to presume that human beings and written law have both been around long enough to materialize all their collective moralistic meanderings and create statutes that cover just about everything you can think of. In my old home state of Michigan it is a twenty year felony to marry someone with the intent of having sex with them. Considering that oral and anal sex is also illegal and the government is obligated to arrest if you’re caught sucking cock, licking a cunt or even buggering someone, let’s just presume they’ve got this whole panties' morality and ethics thing covered by the law already also.
The morality/ethics as reflected by the law in this issue is that you don’t need permission to share photographs of an inanimate object no matter who has touched that inanimate object before you. Unless it is specifically agreed upon by both parties in advance and/or a nondisclosure agreement with the entity that owns said object is in place and/or ownership or copyright notice is otherwise posted directly on said object.
You have the right morally and legally to freely photograph someone’s shoes, cars, bras or panties and distribute them as you see fit. That is the law as I know it from my exposure in the entertainment industry and my exposure to endorsement licensing laws.
-=I Think=-
I think the OP should staple his girlfriends mouth shut, dress her in just soiled panties, crate her up and ship her nonconsensually to the guy in Norway. What are internet friends for after all? If you don’t have the balls to staple your bitches mouth shut and mail her off on loan to some horny net geek against her will, then you aren’t a ‘twue’ camera wielding, dirty panty sniffing Dom are you? You’re just some weird sneaky fuck with a camera and a fantasy that has 9 layers of separation and insulation between you and the real live wet cunt you are fantasizing about. I mean… come on… a pic of the panties? Not even the real panties themselves? Is it a scratch & sniff pic?
-=Object Appreciation 101=-
Dude… look up objectification, you’ll get the real wet cunt instead of just the panties. I am also sure you can find some distance from the humanity and/or intimacy and/or commitment that scares you if you learn to make her into an inhuman object. Here, I’ll help you step up to the next level of object appreciation. It’s a simple 8 step plan. It’s 25% easier than becoming a friend of Bill W... he has 12 steps from what I hear.
1. Try istening to this song
2. Practicing this line: “It puts the panties in the basket or it gets the hose again”
3. Make her blow you while you sniff those panties from now on.
4. Make her sign the dirty panties with a sexy note to your net geek buddy and mail them off. – Now that’s the spirit! We'll make a 'twue' Dom of you yet!
5. After your friend in Norway jerks off in his shorts and mails the sticky spunk filled jock wad back to you, make your bitch stuff them in her mouth and put her on a plane to Norway. She has to carry them all the way their in her mouth.
6. While she is gone, get a new bitch and a new hobby.
7. Join a forum and make a new post about your new ethical dilemma with your new hobby in a thread.
8 Then report back here and update us all to let us know how all that is working out for you, ok?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[edit: type-o (leave = level). Not bad, all that crap and only one type-o]
|
|
|
|
