mistersomeone -> RE: Advice (8/11/2008 4:18:31 PM)
|
Hi, Forced relations with a member of the same sex does not make one bisexual, no more than it makes them homosexual. One's sexual identity is defined by their own personal preferences not by the actions of (an)other person(s). There is always the possibility that although originally opposed to the scenario, the male slave realizes that they are aroused by and attracted to the bull (and other men for that matter) at which point, sure he could have discovered bisexuality. But even at this, if the male slave simply endures it, then I wouldn't consider that being bisexual.... more like being very obedient/submissive! I also tend to agree with the other posts about forced sexual interaction between 2 males when the slave has not consented being a BAD thing. That would be considered rape in my book (and probably in most law books as well). Now don't get me wrong, if the slave does not enjoy such an activity, but consents to it, then that is a different situation all together. In either case, if you are going to bring a 3rd party into the relationship, then I would strongly suggest you all be very clear as to what is being consented to. Speaking from my own personal experience, I enjoy anal training with a wide selection of toys... but sex with another male is a different scene all together. I would hate for a Domme to assume that consent for one, implicitly implies consent for the other...
|
|
|
|