subbisherri
Posts: 109
Joined: 5/28/2006 Status: offline
|
Thks so much for the input, more to think about now! LuckyAlbatross, you're totally right, I may not be quite sure as to what "submissive" really is. There seems to be a blurred line between bottoming (which I think I know, and I know I love) and subbing. I used to think it was more of a dichotomy, not so sure anymore. Candystripper, gee I thought it was just me but I have started dressing a bit differently. Skirts a bit higher, tops a bit lower, jewellery is a bit closer to the neck like a collar instead of a chain hanging down. Not quite sure who I'm showing off too, though. So maybe that's a good thing, it's not for showing off to someone else, it's just showing who I am to anyone who is aware enough to notice? The one common thread seems to be, those who are quite content (and making me so envious) in their submissiveness, and able to not have that part of their sexuality affect their professional lives, well most if not all of them are subby to a partner, or a specific person. It seems to be an exclusive thing and I think that's wonderful. Can I trade places with you? Dolf, what if one doesn't have one person to be solely submissive to? What if the person they love doesn't WANT them to be submissive, even if everything else between them is simply outstanding? If this sounds like the whine of a conflicted soul, yeah it is... That follows on to why I started this trip and came here in the first place. I'm in love with a man, he's an awesome top but he's not dominant and thus while being his bottom is satisfying and fulfilling, I can't be his sub: he doesn't want a sub. It would be so easy if my SM relationship transmorgified into a BDSM relationship, but I have to accept that it's not in the near future.The sex is great, the SM play is great, but the BD and DS play sucks, in fact it's pretty much non-existant. Well, not the B part but everything else. While I believe that a bottom can have much fun without a dedicated partner (witness any scene club or the number of pro-dom(me)s, I have a fundamental belief that a submissive will not be emotionally fulfilled with multiple partners or the occasional session or scene or anything like that. A bottom can have a great time at it, but the emotional content of subbing just doesn't lend itself to that sort of short-term pleasure. As much as all that may sound like a petulant whine, it's not. There are some good things to take from this, and I think the best one is that I need to stop experimenting and start committing, stop trying and start being. If I need this and he can't be it, then perhaps our paths diverge. Or, I figure out how to do what most of you have done, being subby to just one partner and he figures out how to be that one? Hmmm, maybe it's less learning and more teaching. Great, there's a whole new thing to try to figure out... Bottom line though, if I can take one good thing from the start of this thread, and I hope I have this right: those who are really happy as submissives are submissive to particular partners, and not to life in general. That's so cool, that's just what I need. thks! ss.
|