Thadius
Posts: 5091
Joined: 10/11/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Owner59 quote:
ORIGINAL: Thadius I criticize my government all of the time.... however I usually don't feel the need to add to the already loud voices that do so on a regular basis around here. Also my reasons, are usually for a different reason. Just like I didn't take offense to the personal swipe at my intelligence by somebody else in this thread... I prefer to discuss the issues, not the people making them. Funny,haven`t heard you say much in the way of criticism here of gov.,accept for Obama or liberals. Yet you claim you be un-bias,fair-minded and mutually sympathetic. To be fair,I don`t read all your posts,but you`re anything but un-biased. I don`t try to pretend,at least. ~~~~~~~~~~~ To Thad, Honest question,honest answer. Whould we be in half the trouble we`re in now,had the neo-cons not taken office? I never said I was unbiased. I also don't run through threads blaming everything on one side or the other. One can be fair minded and have a bias. To answer you question though. Regardless of your definition of what a neo-con is... Half of the incidents that have been mentioned by others in this thread happened during Dem administrations, so my answer is yes. We would be in at least half of the trouble we are in now, and arguably just as much. For example, the tragedy of 9-11 would have happened regardless of who was elected. Know what I mean?
_____________________________
When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends." ~ Japanese Proverb
|