RE: Vested interest in your country (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Thadius -> RE: Vested interest in your country (8/22/2008 11:48:12 AM)

How would somebody define the use of these 2 words together? Universal and voluntary. As in Universal voluntary service.




Sanity -> RE: Vested interest in your country (8/22/2008 12:17:32 PM)

 
Newspeak term for slavery.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

How would somebody define the use of these 2 words together? Universal and voluntary. As in Universal voluntary service.




Irishknight -> RE: Vested interest in your country (8/23/2008 7:04:17 PM)

While I believe that 2 years of community service would make better citizens and a better country, I do not believe that it should be tied to the ability to cast a vote in a federal election.  The community service would be to teach so many of thse asanine little pseudo intellectuals about true community.  Helping one's neighbors.  Remember, anyone with a working pair of balls can father a child.  Only a village can raise an idiot.  And every village needs an idiot.




bipolarber -> RE: Vested interest in your country (8/23/2008 8:22:12 PM)

The problem with using Heinlien, Hubbard, or Norman as a basis for running your life, and your governments is, they are writing fictional stories, so they can manipulate reality to support their opinions. In reality, trying to apply RAH's "soft fascisim" would lead to the greatest power being heaped onto the military industrial complex (a problem we're already having with our current system) and they would have to perpetuate a state of war with neighboring countries, just to sustain itself. There would be few to no checks and balances, since the elected officials would all play to the military base, and would not worry about other social issues like healthcare, education, and infrastructure, except where it would benefit that particular special interest. In short, it would be a great idea... if you want to live in a military-police state.

The private sector has often done a great deal to support the US, and democracy, without having to join the peace corps or force other community service... Apple computers, for example, donated several hundred computers to dissident groups in the Soviet Union back in the 1980's, and those groups were able to communicate and organize in ways never before possible. As such they began to flourish faster than the Soviet government could put them down. No guns fired, the capital investment by Apple very minor, but the end effect was of slowly erroding the power of the central comittiee.

What would be far more useful, although I'm not sure how you would go about it, would be to have all of America's industries donate to a system or organization, which could be utilized to help in emergency situations here at home, and lend aid to emerging democracies on a regular basis... Not the UN, not FEMA, but an independant organization of industry. A way of getting aid to others, without having to use food and medical care, or equipment as political or religious "bait."

It's just a passing thought. Probably just as impractical as forcing someone to give up their freedom for 2 or 3 years, if they want the rights that the framers felt was God-given. Still, I can understand why it would seem attractive: We've already pissed on the Constitution, and delved into being a wire-tap happy torture state. So, why not just scrap the whole idea behind the Bill of Rights?  It would be a perfect progression of... the GOP agenda.




Thadius -> RE: Vested interest in your country (8/24/2008 4:41:16 AM)

Just one question for you bipolarber.  When did you become a Ron Paul fan?

I will leave it at that, as I think you know what I am talking about. [8|]




Termyn8or -> RE: Vested interest in your country (8/24/2008 2:19:34 PM)

I would support some form of that, to pay for education. The problem is we do things all wrong here.

Everybody wants to think military, but that is something that requires you to move away from home, at the very least for basic training. This doesn't work for everybody. It wouldn't work for me for two reasons. First of all I detest using the word Sir, I use it very rarely. That kind of discipline just would never work for me. Second, I quit school at 16 to go to work. My Father hails this as some sort of selfless act to help the family, which it did, but in reality I hated school. This was mainly because of the rules and control, the discipline. My Parents were divorced and Dad had to leave the state for a while.

Mom though a graduate of a good parochial school, did not have alot of earning power. We were just about dirt poor, actually lucky to have a COLOR TV. Never took public assistance. Dad did pay off the furniture and appliances after the divorce, but at the time there was no child support coming. When Judge Judy gets on someone's case about "Those kids need to eat NOW !", I understand exactly what she means. I made almost as much as Mom, and gave her half my takehome pay, which left me plenty of money for gas and whatever.

If I had been conscripted into military service that income would not have been there. That is not the answer for everybody. There are plenty of other things that need to be done.

If you enlist in the military today, they give you college money and all that, but only if you get out alive, plus what good is college money if you have PTSD and radiation sickness from DU weapons ? It's a good thing if you get out alive and healthy, but war has become a much dirtier environment than it used to be. Usually in the old days if you came back without too many holes in you, you would be fine. Can't count on that anymore.

There are many other things that need to be done. Since Mom is over 65 now the city will send people out free of charge to mow her grass or shovel her snow. What are we paying these guys ? With benefits and retirement it can get expensive, and they are doing a job that any kid could do almost. On the clock, they should be doing something more useful.

Of course this all comes from taxes, mainly property taxes, as does a good part of the funding for primary education. This system is far from perfect to say the least. People without kids are financing something they are not using. Then when it comes to secondary education People need grants and student loans, maybe even to mortgage the family home.

Let's say we don't rock the boat too much, because as we know it is about to sink if we don't do something. Let's say we have a public works program, and for certain things public employees normally do, students rack up hours and that is applied to tuition.

That would not be mandatory volunteerism. Let's say if they accumulated a thousand hours a year, the remainder of their tuition would go into an extremely low interest loan. They could start in high school.

I can't sit here right now and figure out the whole plan, that would take some time. Put it this way, if they bring back the draft, draftees still get the college money and whatever other benefits volutary enlistees get, do they not ?

I would advocate some sort of compensated public service for everybody, without putting them on a payroll and all this crap. What I would not support is something that requires one to move away from home. The situation today with both Parents working usually, sometimes the eldest sibling drives the younger ones to school, whatever, and help out in other ways. It is not always a job.

Some of them do have the time to rack up the hours, others would have to do the service on Saturdays or whatever. I don't think it would even have to be mandatory, I think good Parents would say "Boy, you got a chance to work and do something good and contribute to your education, if you don't take it, when you get older, welcome to the exciting field of landscaping". Although some landscapers make good money, they are the ones with the flair for it, the rest are relegated to cutting grass.

Let's say at 1,000 hours service you get five grand for college and one point off the interest on student loans. At banker's hours that's roughly half a year's work. Doesn't matter if you take more than a year to do it, just that you do it.

That plan is something that just came off the top of my head, many things need to be thought out. Making it mandatory, or witholding diplomas if they haven't reached the minimum, I don't want to make that call. If I were charged with the duty to make such a plan work, I would probably need some help, like an accountant or something, and I would seek ALOT of public opinion.

Operating on the tightrope of this economy, it would not be the easiest thing in the world. I would not want to put public workers out, but if they are getting a bunch of overtime shoveling snow or mowing grass for little old Ladies, at time and a half, the costs would be nil if that was eliminated. Just think of that, guy makes $15 an hour his overtime is $22.50. He his driving a huge gas guzzling truck with a bunch of lawnmowers and who knows what else on it. From who knows how far ? How many hours we pay for him to sit in a traffic jam when there is a student down the street who would do it for ten bucks ? Not to mention that the little old Lady has a perfectly operational lawnmower in the garage.

There are so many possibilities it is almost mind boggling, but the world does not operate that way. So much is wasted and squandered.

Here's another idea, they ride "shotgun" in a one Man cop car. They observe and take notes, like on a DUI bust. They can then go to court instead of the cop. They never get out of the car during a bust, they just observe and take notes. That one might not be workable, but maybe.........

Helping out at a fire station, a homeless shelter, a public hospital. The possibilities are endless if you think about it the right way. Different jobs could even have different ratings, like 1.3, 1.5 and so forth which would mean for ten hours of satisfactory service you would get credit for thirteen or fifteen hours. This would be reserved for jobs that are nasty, difficult or require some skill.

A situation like that might impel some to learn, to get a higher rated mode of service. I see it as a win win, if implemented properly. Don't trust the government to do it, the first thing they would do is throw four or five million of our money to fund a think tank to study the idea and then screw it up in the end.

Let military service be an option, but the rest is pretty much civilians. Let the civilians handle it. The local agencies pay five buck per credit hour into the fund, this is where the money comes from when it is time to belly up with the tuition. Any company, agency, anybody can apply for the help, and they get it cheap at five bucks an hour, unless the job category is higher than that. Students gain real life experience and new skills. Even if they need a job to pay for books etc., no matter what, this takes a burden off the family.

And then, the whole thing will probably result, demographically, in more educated people per capita. Actually then it is a win win win.

It would be nice if there were people who could implement such a plan, but we sure as hell don't want the government in control of it.

T




Aneirin -> RE: Vested interest in your country (8/24/2008 3:26:50 PM)

I have Swedes in the family, from a country where there is a form of National Service, but some of the Swedes in my family escaped National Service by being already involved in another form of National service, which benefits all. These people chose child care, and the teaching of children, my Swedish family escaped the guns and killing and focused their energies on caring. At first when I heard this, I laughed so much, but the reality of it all was that child care is no easy task, as they were responsible for the people who would look after the teachers and child carers in their old age, the future of the country and it's way of life.

Tell me how it is that someone skilled in killing humans is going to be a benefit to the rest of humanity ? Surely the ability to kill is not an indication of a better citizen, hell, there are already too many killers out there who do what they do without belonging to a military organisation, so exactly what would a military regime for a couple of years do for a person ?




Termyn8or -> RE: Vested interest in your country (8/24/2008 6:06:09 PM)

I have a nice short answer for that An. Those who kill the killers can be very useful. I will admit to thinking that those who teach the future teachers might be alot more useful if they do it right, as long as they are not killed by the killers who should have been killed.

That might sound like a limerick or something, but it's not. Each person has a function in society, and if that function matches their abilities and desires, society works much better. Perhaps it is time for people to be politicians who should be politicians, instead of people who belong in prison.

T




Irishknight -> RE: Vested interest in your country (8/25/2008 4:01:57 PM)

Wow, An.  I like the fact that you seem to think that the only thing a person can get out of the military is the skill to kill humans.  It shows how wrong the left can be with their dogma.   The military teaches many other valuable skills.  Many commercial pilots began their careers as military pilots.  Many learn electronics and computer skills that they would never have been able to afford to learn as civilians.  Some just learn discipline, self discipline, and get to learn what it is to be part of a team.  Do they have to learn to kill? Of course they do.  But it is not the only thing they learn.  To even imply such is ignorance and arrogance on the part of those who think themselves intellectually superior. 
Learning to give something of yourself to the greater community, wherever one learns it, will always make one a better citizen.




Alumbrado -> RE: Vested interest in your country (8/25/2008 4:57:46 PM)

Mark this in your calendar, Term and I are agreeing. 

While the stereotype of the loser veteran with no skills but blowing people up is great for a Hollywood plot line, in reality, there are those who assumed the citizen-soldier or citizen-LEO role, did what had to be done, and never became the drain on society that Aneirin insinuates. 

In fact learning to kill, and even having to kill without become nothing more than a killer would make a better citizen in my estimation.

 




Vendaval -> RE: Vested interest in your country (8/25/2008 7:22:54 PM)

That is one of the best quotes I have seen on here in a while, it would do well as your signature line.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Irishknight
Remember, anyone with a working pair of balls can father a child.  Only a village can raise an idiot.  And every village needs an idiot.




meatcleaver -> RE: Vested interest in your country (8/26/2008 8:54:06 AM)

Conscription is for automatons.

I've lived long enough to notice that governments don't have the welfare of their citizens at heart, their priority is the health of the wealth of the rich and powerful. Until that changes, no one is going to get me to serve my country on this side of the grave.




Irishknight -> RE: Vested interest in your country (8/26/2008 9:14:26 AM)

But would it be so bad to give your time helping Jimmy Carter build houses for the poor?  That is service as well.  Why does everyone immediately jump on the military aspect?   There are more ways to get out and do something for your country than military. 




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.320313E-02