leadership527
Posts: 5026
Joined: 6/2/2008 Status: offline
|
Well actually sunshine, I kind of think you did attack her. Specifically, you posted completely irellevant stuff to what was a pretty clear question. The things you posted were, especially with your added commentary, not particularly flattering. And now your doing so again. To the OP: I've had this same question. I hear about subs living to serve all the time. Somehow though, I've always suspected that even the 'service subs' were expecting more out of the relationship than the opportunity to serve. The answers you've gotten here align well with what I would've thought. There is much hyperbole and flowery fantasy expressed on all sides in the BDSM world. But the real truth is that real people behave like... well... real people. For the most part, when someone does something, they are hoping to get something out of it. And honestly, serving me is no great treat. Really, if all some sub wanted to do was shine shoes, my shoes are no different than anyone elses. I'm assuming serving you would be about the same. So that means that all dominants are on a level playing field that way and so "opportunity to serve" isn't really a valid incentive to form a relationship with you (or me). In fact, if all some person wanted to do was serve another human, why be limited to the world of BDSM? Most people, in general, would be fine with that. I'd love to have a maid that I didn't pay.
|