Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


WhiplashSmile2 -> Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 1:47:09 AM)

There is a great amount of diversity amoung us in the BDSM Community at large.

I'm opening this topic for people to share known or developing sub-cultures and organizations inside the Community at large.

I'm also intested in hearing from people, where they feel is a lack of sub-cultural communitity or organization for them.





Allondra -> RE: Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 3:08:15 AM)

What's your definition of "community"?




WhiplashSmile2 -> RE: Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 3:19:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Allondra
What's your definition of "community"?


When i used "BDSM Community at large" it should be obvious that this encompassed anybody and everybody who is into one or more aspects of BDSM regardless of the sub-cultural or sub-communities views.  

When I refer to "sub-community" I am refering to things such as MAst, Goreans, Leather Community, Old Guard, and any sub-cultures/organizations that are more specific or more defined.

The "BDSM community" is a very loose and extremely diverse collection of people, groups, and sub-cultured together.  Where nobody true lays claim to any one wayesm lines of practice nor thinking.

Please, it's not the intention of this thread to enter into a Debate about what defines the "BDSM community" for the it's the people who self identify with being part of it that defines it.  For instance there is a "Christian BDSM Sub-Community" or culture that has it's place under the "BDSM Community at large" Just as there are other Sub-Communities or sub-cultures that have every right to be considered to be part of the "General BDSM Community" at large.

Again, this thread is not intended to become a Debate over what is or is not the "BDSM community" at large.  It's intent is to look at those who have clearly carved and defined their slice or corner of it.   Also to address that lack of specific niches or corners being defined and cultivated.




Allondra -> RE: Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 3:51:04 AM)

Gotcha, thanks.  The reason I asked is because I (although living a d/s relationship) don't consider myself part of the bdsm community.  So I guess, under your definition, I belong to an uncarved, undefined slice or corner of it.  I wonder if any of the sorts of subgroups you are interested in are larger than the group of us who don't enjoy or want to belong to groups?  




catize -> RE: Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 5:21:26 AM)

There are a number of generally accepted concepts in the ‘community at large’ that I disagree with.  I am a sub-culture of one, but aren’t we all in one way or another? 




WhiplashSmile2 -> RE: Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 6:14:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: catize
There are a number of generally accepted concepts in the ‘community at large’ that I disagree with.  I am a sub-culture of one, but aren’t we all in one way or another? 

LOL.. we all are Sub-Culture of one.  However, when it comes down to seeking out others with similar views and perspective, to engage in dialog upon topics and specific shared interests.  Any Group of people with similar views that starts to develop.  Perhaps not on a formal level.   In same cases there is the formal development of Groups.

Thank you for sharing your disagreement with some of the Generally accepted concepts in the "Community at large".   You by no means are the only one to feel and think this way.  If any thing, I'm finding this to be a little more common for a number of people.




WhiplashSmile2 -> RE: Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 6:32:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Allondra
Gotcha, thanks.  The reason I asked is because I (although living a d/s relationship) don't consider myself part of the bdsm community.  So I guess, under your definition, I belong to an uncarved, undefined slice or corner of it.  I wonder if any of the sorts of subgroups you are interested in are larger than the group of us who don't enjoy or want to belong to groups?  


I can understand why some people don't wish to be part of a group, that have no desire for it.  However, with that said.  People that have an active interest in BDSM or D/s relationship turn and look for advice, which to engage in dialog regarding specific topics or interests.  Such as here on this message board.

In part, I'm looking to get a feel for some of the short coming of not having a specific Sub-Culture/Organization that is more centered around specific desires and needs.

As in the case with Leadership527, his relationship focus is upon D/s without S&M being part of it.  It's painfully clear that MAsT has not lend itself to being focused enough upon D/s but rather the focus is lost due to the Heavy S&M elements.

I have encountered a number of people who's focus is upon D/s and could give a rats ass about S&M.

For this very reason, I can see a growing demand an organization or sub-culture movement, for people to indentify or relate to.   M/s or D/s without S&M.  Where it's made clear that S&M is not part of the adopted outline of things.

That if such an organization or sub-culture existed, that people could establish local chapters or groups in their area with this focus.  People of similar interests could interact with one another, without the focus being over-run with S&M.  That perhaps more people who are not into S&M, would become involved a little more.   Instead of attending events, groups and functions that don't meet their needs and walking away with a bad taste in their mouth.

Yes, under my definition and views of BDSM, you Allondra, belong to some undefined and uncarved slice or corner of it.  If you did not, clearly you would not be active on the message boards here, unless you were researching or seeking to gain insight into the world of BDSM, without having personal interests in it yourself.  If you can understand the point I'm attempting to make.




IronBear -> RE: Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 7:44:18 AM)

I was waiting for someone to mention Gorean Lifestyle, Victorian Lifestyle and 50's Household. Whilst all three are sub-cultures and may even come unter the general "Kink" heading, they are not truely part of the BEDSM Culture even though a great deal of BDSM activities may be found in a number of such homes. The reality is that none of them are either BDSM or sub/slave dependent and can happily thrive without the BDSM practices of a slave being present.

Personally, I find that having a slave of five is highly satisfactory and it is jolly well satisfying to have a slave either kneeling at you feet or on the floor beside you legs with her head resting on your thigh watching TV or listening to music.

IB
(The incorrigible, irrepressible and irreverent Bear)





CallaFirestormBW -> RE: Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 7:44:58 AM)

I think this is one reason that I have so much difficulty with the whole concept of "BDSM community". In reality, we are a group of people who share some common activities, but, for the most part, as a community, we really aren't any more of a communal gathering than people on a subway train, who probably -also- share any number of common activities, but certainly don't consider themselves a 'community'.

The way that I do WIITID is nothing like the way my Darling does WIITSD -- even in our disciplinary methods and service preferences, we diverge. We share a home, and have for over a decade, but we are like two riders on a teeter-totter -- it is our capacity to cooperate and occasionally even compromise (yes, despite our natures, we -are- capable of compromise, if the stakes are sufficient [;)]) which has allowed us to thrive over these years.

I am in several micro-gatherings in our local "community". My Darling and I are provisional members of a FemDom community here, and I am active in Special Interest Groups for edge-play, D/s (without SM), a group specially for tops, a group for fetish photographers... sub groups within the larger group. These groups came to be, at least in part, because "the community" is something so broad that people were -still- struggling to find others who shared WIWTTD.

Again, to my mind, the largest challenge facing the BDSM "community" is that, for many of us, we are not any more alike than two people at adjoining tables at a random Starbucks -- the only thing we share is a form of personal inter-relationship that is frowned on by the mainstream of society, and to me, that is certainly not enough, in and of itself, to build a community on.

Calla Firestorm




colouredin -> RE: Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 7:55:10 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW
I think this is one reason that I have so much difficulty with the whole concept of "BDSM community". In reality, we are a group of people who share some common activities, but, for the most part, as a community, we really aren't any more of a communal gathering than people on a subway train, who probably -also- share any number of common activities, but certainly don't consider themselves a 'community'.


But there is a gay community for example, maybe with sexual subcultures we view it differantly? And also with your subway train thing its not quite the same, if a large group of people met up weekly to discuss chess they could still consider themselves a chess community couldnt they?

Personally the only word i really identify with is sub so yeah my needs are met fine, i dont think i fit into a smaller sub -culture than that. Also i accept and indeed to an extent revel in the fact im part of a group, i never had the obbsession with being totally individual (irony is normally those that do tend to actually end up fitting more and more to the stereotype) I dont think the fact that some are into S&M and some D&S requires differant events or groupings or anything, I do think there are gaps around not for more specific gatherings but more for gatherings of people who arent that much into all the labels and stereotypes, people who dont like dressing up or whatever. I do think as a community we are diversifying but thats not a bad thing and there is still a vaguely common interest for most, I enjoy listening to differant peoples ideas and desires even if i totally dont relate to them. In fact they help me to make more sense of what I need




CallaFirestormBW -> RE: Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 8:05:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: colouredin

But there is a gay community for example, maybe with sexual subcultures we view it differantly? And also with your subway train thing its not quite the same, if a large group of people met up weekly to discuss chess they could still consider themselves a chess community couldnt they?



See, that is -exactly- my point - the gay community all share one uniform identifying characteristic -- they love people of the same gender. This is specific. Despite variations, there is one clear undercurrent that they share. For the group of people who meet for chess, they all share an interest in chess...

The BDSM "community" -is- really, IMO, more like that subway train. Some of us have long-term relationships, some of us mess around for a few hours and never see the person again, some of us have many partners, some of us are looking for The One, some of us like interactions that include pain, some of us like interactions that share certain forms of manners, some of us like blood and some can't stand the sight of it, some of us include sex as part of their experience, and for some it is completely asexual.... there is no real 'common' bond, aside from the fact that all of us are pretty much ostracized from the mainstream community for some act that we practice... and -that-, frankly, gives us more in common with psychopaths than with one another.... there are those among us who don't even believe that ongoing issues of consent are relevant to WIITTD. Truly, we are a community by the barest of criteria -- we are a community because we are struggling with a way to accept that what we've chosen to do is maligned by society, and yet we do not want to let go of it, and that is -not- always a strong enough bond to truly enable us to communicate or work effectively with one another.

just my nickel's worth

CFB




colouredin -> RE: Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 8:15:33 AM)

cant the common denominator simply BE relating to the term BDSM?




CallaFirestormBW -> RE: Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 8:35:16 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: colouredin

cant the common denominator simply BE relating to the term BDSM?


Possibly -- but as an earlier thread reinforced, we can't even agree on what BDSM -means-.

Calla Firestorm




leadership527 -> RE: Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 8:56:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL:  Whiplashsmile2
As in the case with Leadership527, his relationship focus is upon D/s without S&M being part of it.  It's painfully clear that MAsT has not lend itself to being focused enough upon D/s but rather the focus is lost due to the Heavy S&M elements.

I have encountered a number of people who's focus is upon D/s and could give a rats ass about S&M.

For this very reason, I can see a growing demand an organization or sub-culture movement, for people to indentify or relate to.   M/s or D/s without S&M.  Where it's made clear that S&M is not part of the adopted outline of things.

I certainly think that you are on the right track here.  It is my general impression both from my own experience and from talking to some of the old-hands who've been around a while, that there are a lot more of me than just me and, by and large, we come, take a look around, and leave again.  SimplyMicheal's thought was that what you see in "the scene" is only the tip of the iceberg and that, in fact, there's a lot more people quietly just doing WIITWD in our living rooms.  If that's right (and I'm more and more believing that it is), there is a HUGE unserved market (artisans take note)... not just for meetings, but for everything.  Take collars for example.  Those with my aesthetic are not interested in a leather collar with spikes and whatnot.  Nor do I want to put a cheap piece of costume jewelry around my wife's neck. Where then, does one turn, when one wants a collar made to the artistic jewelry standards that you'd expect of any other piece of jewelry I'd buy for her?  Ditto with everything else.  There's an entire aesthetic that is just not being served.  And, I might add for you artisans out there, an aesthetic that brings with it a lot of money.  I am currently semi-retired and even so, I'd drop a grand on my wife's collar if only I could find something.  If I was employed, that figure would easily jump up to a few grand.  Sadly, it looks like I'm going to have to command my (very talented) slave to make herself a collar.

Insofar as the SM part.  I think you're just a bit off-base.  It's not that SM is included in the meetings that I attend.  Nor would I care if I was at a meeting discussing the D/s dynamic and it just happened to be true that a lot of the participants happened to also like SM.  You know what?  A lot of the participants probably like golf too, and I don't.  Big deal.  It's the unrelenting focus on SM topics that ends up making me feel like I don't belong at these functions.  For instance, at the MAST meeting one topic was "When does BDSM become abuse?"  That was a great topic.  The vast majority of the discussion, however, was all around physical abuse -- back to SM as opposed to M/s dynamics.  So in that way, I go, I learn a bit that is tangentially related to WIITWD, but largely feel like an outsider looking in.  I could extrapolate from that discussion a useful definition for me, but it took a lot of interpretation.

Honestly, none of this is really a bad thing.  It's only bad if those at the MAST meeting would like to see those like me continue to attend.  I am perfectly capable (and have) setup my own support group. I mean, seriously, the kinky SM people need a place to discuss their sexual topics and, bluntly, they were here first.

OK, now to the original question.. here's what I've come up with (and my personal reaction to them expressed as sweeping generalizations).

BDSM:  Kinky sex practitioners with some knowledge and interest in relationships and power dynamics.
Gorean:  M/s power dynamic practitioners with some interest in kinky sex and an oddly unstated philosphy.  I actually sometimes feel closer to the goreans than anyone else in a wierd sort of way.  Quite clearly at least, in the gorean sub community, sex is not the primary focus.
Victorians:  No clue
Domestic Discipline:  Disingenuous kinksters hiding behind some wierd veil of "loving relationship".  Heavy focus on spanking the wife.  Honestly, given the focus on corporal punishment, either these people are just afraid to fess up and say "we like kinky SM play" or they have the worst behaved wifes/subs I've ever heard of.
Taken in Hand:  Possibly interesting, I need to look into this more
Old Guard:  Heh, a well structured community that has absolutely nothing to do with me - sex based, big on highly stylized ritualistic behaviors.
Leathermen:  See also, old guard
MAST:  Allegedly all around M/s dynamics, but in practice largely centered on SM issues, see also: BDSM

I might've missed one, but that's what I've come up with in my research.  There was also that one site/community that focuses on training the slave to the point where she no longer has consent.  I can't remember that one, but I shrugged it off as either delusional or dangerous depending on whether they succeed or not.  I have no doubts I could train the consent out of my wife.  I choose not to for what is to me, good and compelling reasons.




colouredin -> RE: Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 8:59:00 AM)

so what about people who consider themselves to be part of the power dynamic but not identifying with any of your sweeping generalisations? I always define myself as being part of BDSM but your definition of it totally doesnt fit me




WhiplashSmile2 -> RE: Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 9:28:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: IronBear
I was waiting for someone to mention Gorean Lifestyle, Victorian Lifestyle and 50's Household. Whilst all three are sub-cultures and may even come unter the general "Kink" heading, they are not truely part of the BEDSM Culture even though a great deal of BDSM activities may be found in a number of such homes. The reality is that none of them are either BDSM or sub/slave dependent and can happily thrive without the BDSM practices of a slave being present.

Personally, I find that having a slave of five is highly satisfactory and it is jolly well satisfying to have a slave either kneeling at you feet or on the floor beside you legs with her head resting on your thigh watching TV or listening to music.

IB
(The incorrigible, irrepressible and irreverent Bear)



One thing I have noted in regards to people conducting themselves online here, is that the Goreans, Victorian Lifestylers and 50's household people are not trying to impose nor impress everybody with their perspectives.  That there way is the one wayesm, nor are they trying to impress everybody and their brother/sister.  

Perhaps I am missing something here, but those that have a sub-culture or corner of the BDSM carved and indentified are more well mannered.  They are not trying to impress everybody and impose their BDSM views upon the world.  Hence, they have adopted to embrace their own slice of the BDSM universe.  They are not trying to bend the whole BDSM community to their ways.   This is what I'm trying to express here.

I do think that having BDSM as the sole and simple common denominator is enough to define what the larger scale sense of what the "BDSM community" can be.  Take any combinations of what BDSM represents, and if you are practicing or have a sincere interest in the minimal of what ONE of the letters represent, you should be welcome to become part of the "BDSM community" at large. 

I am advocating that those who wish to follow a more structured, more defined, closer to one wayesm approach for themselves, find appropriate existsing sub-cultures, or groups of people with similar interests.

I have yet to see somebody who openly embraces and informs people that they are Gorean, get into a fight over the Political Correctness of how somebody Does what they Do in a Victorian Lifestyle household.   Why?  Because both parties are aware of the differences and respect it.   It's a result of people embracing their own corner of the world and not trying to piss in other peoples corner of the world. 

The BDSM community at large, is full of diversity.  This Diversity appears to be growing as more people come into as well.  The internet and the information age is making it easier for people to interact, bond together, and find common interests.  There are social changes occuring right now within the Scope of BDSM at large.

Some people are screaming out loud about the changes that are taking place.  There is a certain amount of what would be described as "retaliation" that is occuring.  A resistence to change.  This is only natural, in my opinion.  However, I am simply amazed that people are embracing Hostility and Retaliation, attempting to fight something that's a loosing and mote batttle.  While a much better focus would be for them to say,  OK let's continue to embrace our ways by carving out our slice and niche and sub-culture inside of BDSM at large.  

I think very highly of how the Goreans have achieved this.  I believe, that the Goreans, have established themselves as a via sub-culture, maintain their own corner of the world, and don't mindless going around trying to pick fights with everybody.  The Goreans are not threaten by what is going on with the Social Changes, and with how the internet is changing things.  In fact, dare I say it.  I suspect most Goreans welcome this change, because it mean more people will be prone to Discover the Gorean Sub-Culture.   The BDSM Community at large could endure a few hundred changes, but the Foundations of the Gorean Sub-Culture will be less likely to change.   There is not need for Gorean to get their Underwear in a twist and get in an uproar over social changes. 

What I found interesting was Master Skips Address.  Where he speaks to the M/s Community at large.  That the M/s Community itself is an Group of Outsides inside of a Group of Outsiders (the BDSM or Kink Community) at large. 

Now within the context of BDSM vs KINK.  I have radically changed my mind upon this topic.  Leadership527's post to a thread made me stop and take careful consideration.  I not find it impossible to Relate BDSM on par with KINK.  That Kink is just a component of BDSM.  It's something that is optional.   BDSM can be about KINK and it can be about D&S without the kink.  To equate a D/s relationship to being on par with Kink, is simply non-sense.  Even more so when D/s relationships in there more extreme form are M/s (Master/slave) relationships.   Even a Master/slave relationship is not all about kink.  Kink is simply optional.

I refuse to refer to the larger Community as "The Kink Community".   Instead I would dare say that "The Kink Community" is a sub-culture under "The BDSM community".   I do not oppose the concept of there being a "Kink Community" however I would not use this to descrive the largest Umbrella.   "The Kink Community" is a large Umbrella, but not as large as "The BDSM community" in the context of the concept that I'm presenting here on the thread.

Now, I'm no Master Skip, or anybody remotely close to it.   I'm just another pervy guy with internet access, that's posting out some thoughts based on Observations.   My Name is not Jesus, and I'm nobody's Messiah.

I just know that time and time, certain topics become center stage of crazy debates.  Some people have this notion that their way is the right way for everybody who is into BDSM.  That there's a lack of respect, lack of protocals and lack of this that and another thing.  They complain and bitch about the changes are occuring as more people get involved in the Lifestyle, they want to fight with other people.  Other people are more then happy to fight back.  At times, it becomes almost comical, yet I'm certain it also is painful for those who experience being told, your ways are not right either.

What other possible and logical recourse is there for people to get along with one another?  Perhaps to give thought about carving out their own niches, finding other people with similar views and practices.  If none exist to consider expressing the lack in the "BDSM community" at large.  I also advocate that people consider the importance of Grass-Roots movements in thier own area.  Even if what you are doing can not be connected with an organization at a National or regional level.  At least cultivate a Social Circle of people with similar interests.  Be these mere friendships, where people can hang out together in the backyard while having a BBQ or whatever.

I'm advocating that people take matters into their own hands on a positive note.  I advocate not putting up with mindsets that which to TELL other people that they HAVE No Business being involved in BDSM because there is a difference.

Personally, the likes of Leadership527 should be welcomed into the BDSM community at large.  People should be helpful in pointing him to the resources and groups that he needs to connect with.  He has a sense of not fitting in here, that he's somewhat Vanilla compared to the rest of us.   As a few others have posted on this thread, they too don't agree or feel that they really fit in.  I totally understand the reluctance for some people to embrace being part of BDSM, because BDSM on the whole really is not very welcoming of them.

In terms of Munches and Public Events, I can honestly see where some people don't feel they are free to be themselves.  Like they have to live up to stereotype images.  That well frankly, they might be feeling a little Vanilla compared to other people. 

I'm sitting here reflecting upon a couple of message board threads.  Regarding Public Play Events, another member of this site, made the statement with regards to Masochistic Doms, that they have never seem this type of action scened out ever.  That they have done xxxx (some large number of events).   However, I suspect there's a good reason why they have never seen it.

In terms of who I am as a person and individual, I would be bold enough to do the unexpected and fuck with the stereotype image.  Even at the social risk of other people, thinking that I was not some self respecting Male Dom.  In fact, I would make it a point to Overplay Topping from the Bottom so it was so exaggerated, that I would be UBER TOPPING from the Bottom.  I can come up with a Scene to Deliver just such a performance.  But enough said in regards to my own twisted nature of things.

The Point is that, I would set aside the stereotypes for a minute, if anything do my best to not conform to the Stereotype, but give people who and what I really am.  Even at the risk of Social Gossip and bullshit.  How I conduct myself, really has not effect upon backstabbers and Gossipers, It just places me in the spot light for this negative form of attention.  People fear being put in the spot light of Backstabbers and those that Gossip.  If anything by avoiding it, It's those people that Gossip and backstab that are the ones that hold Social Power.   This at least in terms of how I view it.  I am not always right in the things I think or in my views.  I am human and I'm subject to making misguided assumptions and judgements and assumptions at times.

Again, I'm no Master Skip, I'm just another pervy guy with internet access. 




OrionTheWolf -> RE: Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 10:02:21 AM)

Not all Goreans practice M/s power dynamics, so it does not define them. This is where the breakdown occurs when trying to classify it as part of BDSM.

quote:

ORIGINAL: leadership527

Gorean:  M/s power dynamic practitioners with some interest in kinky sex and an oddly unstated philosphy.  I actually sometimes feel closer to the goreans than anyone else in a wierd sort of way.  Quite clearly at least, in the gorean sub community, sex is not the primary focus.





leadership527 -> RE: Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 10:59:13 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: colouredin
so what about people who consider themselves to be part of the power dynamic but not identifying with any of your sweeping generalisations? I always define myself as being part of BDSM but your definition of it totally doesnt fit me


The simple answer there is that you perceive yourself and/or BDSM differently than I do.  That's why I called them personal reactions and sweeping generalizations.  I didn't mean to imply any sort of "correctness" at all.  In truth, I'd love to see some sort of list like that (which I'm hoping comes out of this thread) wich MUCH better descriptions than what I put.  My annotations are based on largely passing contact with these communities and aren't likely to be correct even for me, much less for you.




leadership527 -> RE: Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 11:04:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf
Not all Goreans practice M/s power dynamics, so it does not define them. This is where the breakdown occurs when trying to classify it as part of BDSM.


And in theory, not all BDSM practitioners are all about sex (as the many goreans would have you believe).  However, in practical usage as opposed to theory, I hold by my statements for both camps.  I assume a community cares about what it spends it's time talking about and writing about (and doing if I have that visibility).  You'll note my sweeping generalization of the domestic discipline crowd was based upon the same reasoning, and equally blatantly unfair to any given individual. 

However, for the sake of not threadjacking this thread, how about we all just ignore my personal reactions (wishing I hadn't written them at all), and just go with the list which was what OP asked for.




swooshieone -> RE: Sub-Cultures/Organizations within BDSM (8/30/2008 12:19:37 PM)

I think the question was about support for sub-communities....

It has been my experience that larger events have tracks which are designed with the more common sub-cultures in mind. Of course having tracks allows one to "custom design" their event/educational experience.

Outside of large events many organizations may have small discussion groups...aka...SIGS.
If your local group doesn't have a special interest group for something you are interested....volunteer.






Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125