leadership527
Posts: 5026
Joined: 6/2/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: StrongSpirit Of all the arguments, your logic seems most convincing, but I still have issues. Heh, careful there. It is a glib statement, not a dictionary definition. But still, I find it very useful. Often times, these sorts of glib statements are useful exactly because while they are not accurate, they expose the truth of things upon inspection. quote:
ORIGINAL:StrongSpirit Would you call someone confident if they correctly realized that they are in fact not the person to do job X and did not try? After all, they were right. They successfully calculated their odds of success and the cost of failure, and did not try because they determined they were not up to the task. Not only confident... but VERY confident. And so would you I'm guessing. You'd be surprised how many jobs I have gotten when my closing statement in the intervew was, "I'm afraid I really don't have the best skill set for this job. This is really some interesting work you're doing here, but I'm not the best candidate for you." People respond to an honest statement of one's capabilities and the self-confidence it implies to be able to say it. An awful lot of hiring managers, apparently, would prefer honest self-confidence over a theoretically better skill set. I would prefer my sub to be honestly self-confident than foolishly attempt to be perfect. Where I would call this not confident is when the person in fact had a reasonable chance of doing the job perhaps with a bit of stretch and did not try. The same mentor said to me... Tossing someone into the pool 6 inches over their head is teaching them to swim. Tossing them in 6' over their head is just drowning them So depending on whether the job was teaching them to swim or drowning them, I'd call their call to not try, poor or good self confidence. quote:
ORIGINAL:StrongSpirit Would you call someone that bought a home with a 2 year ARM, no money down, in Las Vegas 18 months ago foolish or arrogant? They seem to fit your definition of arrogant, having misjudged the odds, difficulty, and their own ability. I think your definition has them as arrogant, while I would call them foolish. In english, many words convey similar meanings with shades of difference. In this case, I would go with "foolish", but if someone pressed me on "arrogant", I'd go with that also. I just think foolish conveys the meaning better. To be fair, I also think that it's pretty much a given that foolish and arrogant go together.
_____________________________
~Jeff I didn't so much "enslave" Carol as I did "enlove" her. - Me I want a joyous, loving, respectful relationship where the male is in charge and deserves to be. - DavanKael
|