RE: Barry's big flip (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Steponme73 -> RE: Barry's big flip (8/31/2008 2:14:40 PM)

Barack has just learned how to square dance that is all!  You dosey do to the left, then you dosey do to the right!  He wants to be elected...so he is going to say whatever it takes to get there!  HE IS A POLITICIAN!!!!  What is so hard to understand?!  They all lie, they all change their positions as the public tide of opinion changes or what is perceived as changing.
The only difference from Barack and Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi...is he is smart enough to find where he is suppose to sit.  They are dumber than a box of rocks and need help




kittinSol -> RE: Barry's big flip (8/31/2008 2:17:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Steponme73

They are dumber than a box of rocks and need help



Yeah? That's why politicians pull the strings and you dance [sm=marionette.gif]. Because they're dumb.




philosophy -> RE: Barry's big flip (8/31/2008 2:50:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

Are those who projected onto Obama in the way you suggested significent or not? And, in a spirit of fairness, is there an analogue to such a group on the Republican side?



         Not anymore, Phil.  When it came to getting the maximum turnout in the primaries and caucuses, the anti-war movement was good to have.  They were already organized, and motivated, with a proven record of bringing energy into play.  Look at how effectively they were manipulated going into the '06 election (the forum archives should provide plenty of examples).  In the general election, not so much.  This is now about how the candidates are viewed by the middle, and quite honestly, neo-hippies beating the drum for peace don't inspire much confidence among clock-punchers.  Quite the opposite, sometimes.

        A Republican analogy?  Fiscal conservatives.


....i think it's hard to argue against the notion that, generally speaking, national elections tend to be fought in the middle of the political spectrum. The edges are already polarised and it is rare for the middle ground not to be the majority. Thus, your point about neo-hippies is well made, although i wouldn't characterise all those against the Iraq adventure as neo-hippies......certainly some are, but not all, and arguably not a majority.....

Interesting point about the equivilant to this on the Republican side being fiscal conservatives. Quite frankly i'm going to have to do a little reading on that....but thanks for the alternate view on this.......




Thadius -> RE: Barry's big flip (8/31/2008 3:05:37 PM)

I am a fiscal conservative (self claimed title) and I don't believe I am at the extreme or on the fringe of the spectrum.




philosophy -> RE: Barry's big flip (8/31/2008 3:24:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

I am a fiscal conservative (self claimed title) and I don't believe I am at the extreme or on the fringe of the spectrum.


....well, the admittedly quick google i've just done on the phrase makes me tend to agree.......which takes me back to my original thesis that the Republican equivilant of the Democrats neo-hippies is the evangelical right......sorry Heretic.




TheHeretic -> RE: Barry's big flip (8/31/2008 7:27:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

I am a fiscal conservative (self claimed title) and I don't believe I am at the extreme or on the fringe of the spectrum.


....well, the admittedly quick google i've just done on the phrase makes me tend to agree.......which takes me back to my original thesis that the Republican equivilant of the Democrats neo-hippies is the evangelical right......sorry Heretic.



        Sorry guys.  I had my tongue stuck in my cheek on that one.  The analogy is only that both groups get some lip service in the primaries, and chucked overboard in time for either the general election, or the start of the term in office.  Idealogically, or in terms of the level of involvement and individual commitment of energy, it doesn't hold at all.

         Comparing the neo-hippies to the evangelicals doesn't work either though.  The fundy-right are a much larger group, and the pandering to them tends to stay fairly constant.




philosophy -> RE: Barry's big flip (8/31/2008 10:53:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


       Sorry guys.  I had my tongue stuck in my cheek on that one.  The analogy is only that both groups get some lip service in the primaries, and chucked overboard in time for either the general election, or the start of the term in office.  Idealogically, or in terms of the level of involvement and individual commitment of energy, it doesn't hold at all.

        Comparing the neo-hippies to the evangelicals doesn't work either though.  The fundy-right are a much larger group, and the pandering to them tends to stay fairly constant.


....hehehe....well you had both me and Thadius there.......but i think you're right about those fundies......they're here to stay, and what that means is anyones guess.




Vendaval -> RE: Barry's big flip (9/1/2008 12:32:49 AM)

Hello Rich,
 
I do not have a problem with the word "responsibly" be added into the conversation.  I never wanted the War in Iraq but also realize that the troops will have to be brought back home in stages lest the situation explodes again.  Most likely many of them will then be sent into Afghanistan and I am sure people will be beating the crap out of each other on this forum once again.




Hippiekinkster -> RE: Barry's big flip (9/1/2008 8:08:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


I`m noticing a trend.

Liberals talking about real issues that concern Americans.

Cons with the petty Paris/Americans are whiners/etc BS.

And a string of puff posts here,talking about non-issues.

Like this one.

Accept for Thadeus,I haven`t seen a serious post criticizing Obama.

America deserves a better quality of debate than this
Agreed. Thadius does a good job maintaining relevancy. I still don't know if he is able to change his position upon acquiring new data (flip-flopping, to the rigid ideologues), but I would like to think so. I give zero credence to one particular poster who claimed I said I didn't know where aspirin came from, but just couldn't seem to find where I said that, even after repeated requests.

I want to know what, if anything, McSame and Palin will do after ANWR has been drilled and the recovery proves to be inadequate.

I want to know why Palin believes it acceptable to teach the cultural creation myth she believes in in Science classes to the exclusion of all other cultural creation myths.

I want to know if McPOW is suffering PTSD after his years in captivity.

I want to know why McBush wants to deny Americans the same quality of health care that he gets.

I want to know why the anti-freedom-of-choice Palin completely ignores the soul in her beliefs about when life begins.

for starters...




TheHeretic -> RE: Barry's big flip (9/1/2008 11:59:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval
 
I do not have a problem with the word "responsibly" be added into the conversation.  I never wanted the War in Iraq but also realize that the troops will have to be brought back home in stages lest the situation explodes again. 



            Exactly, Ven, and that's why the word had to go in.  Out in true believer land, there are a lot of people who still don't really get that though. 

         Would it have been a problem for you if he had said our exit stategy is victory?  If he intends to expand the war in Afghanistan, a perceived retreat in Iraq is suicide.  Since he could be our next President, I hope like hell somebody makes this clear to him.


       We are stuck in Afghanistan as well, but the circumstances that brought us there create a lot more latitude in how we play it, and just how obligated we are.  I think we need a very different strategy to deal with the Taliban.  Except for a couple divisions of Marines to guard the embassy and airport, I'd like to pull every conventional troop out.  Special forces, UAV's, and death from above.




NumberSix -> RE: Barry's big flip (9/1/2008 12:12:37 PM)

Not so, Rich.

We didn't waltz into Afghanistan and upset the status quo.

We don't owe them shit, if they want to play ball, fine, if not, they assume the risk.

Not at all having anything to do with Iraq.  No way shape or form.  The closest you can come is that they exist in the same part of the hemi-sphere.

All other comparisons are 1/0.

Ron




Thadius -> RE: Barry's big flip (9/1/2008 12:30:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster

Agreed. Thadius does a good job maintaining relevancy. I still don't know if he is able to change his position upon acquiring new data (flip-flopping, to the rigid ideologues), but I would like to think so. I give zero credence to one particular poster who claimed I said I didn't know where aspirin came from, but just couldn't seem to find where I said that, even after repeated requests.

I want to know what, if anything, McSame and Palin will do after ANWR has been drilled and the recovery proves to be inadequate.

I want to know why Palin believes it acceptable to teach the cultural creation myth she believes in in Science classes to the exclusion of all other cultural creation myths.

I want to know if McPOW is suffering PTSD after his years in captivity.

I want to know why McBush wants to deny Americans the same quality of health care that he gets.

I want to know why the anti-freedom-of-choice Palin completely ignores the soul in her beliefs about when life begins.

for starters...


I have no problem with changing my position if I find it to be the wrong one, I am a realist not an idealist, however at times I have idealistic goals.

You do realize the way that natural gas is found and recovered?  So there is going to be lots of drilling regardless of which ticket is elected. Simply no choice on that one.

From what I understand of her position on teaching creationism, it is not an exclusive thing, it is supposed to be in addition to evolution, I would guess that if other creationist theories were presented they could be taught as well.  Explain to me again why keeping information away from folks is bad?  Shouldn't they be able to compare and contrast and then make an educated decision on the evidence or lack of that either or all present?

Your last point I am confused about, are you referring to the religious aspect of when life begins? If that is the question, I suppose one could easily find that information by looking at passages discussing Elizabeth and Mary, and the reactions of the then fetus John the baptist.  I am not going to take a side in this debate as I have already stated my positions, and I know I will not change anybody elses beliefs.  One side believes that it is conception, and one side believes at birth. A particular candidate says he isn't sure when a baby is entitled to human rights, as it is above his pay grade.

Seeing as Biden is just a couple years younger that McCain, should we worry about his brain surgery?  Careful what you ask for in comparisons [;)]




TheHeretic -> RE: Barry's big flip (9/1/2008 12:37:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NumberSix

Not at all having anything to do with Iraq.  No way shape or form.  The closest you can come is that they exist in the same part of the hemi-sphere.



          Right, Ron.  Because nothing strikes fear into the heart of an enemy like giving up and running away from the last fight you started...  Oh wait... nevermind.




kdsub -> RE: Barry's big flip (9/1/2008 12:50:33 PM)

I think he is being pragmatic and has carefully weighed his change in stance on withdrawal. He is realizing his immediate withdrawal stance has lost steam because of the success of the surge and recent negotiations on withdrawal dates with the Bush Administration.

He knows he will not lose the peace movement because the alternative is McCain's plan which is by far the most unacceptable to them. He hopes to pick up a few more votes from the center right by being reasonable in his stance due the the recent developments.

Butch




NumberSix -> RE: Barry's big flip (9/1/2008 2:11:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

quote:

ORIGINAL: NumberSix

Not at all having anything to do with Iraq.  No way shape or form.  The closest you can come is that they exist in the same part of the hemi-sphere.



        Right, Ron.  Because nothing strikes fear into the heart of an enemy like giving up and running away from the last fight you started...  Oh wait... nevermind.


see, this is where the low-brow shit aint working for you, thats my job.

what enemy?

WMD?
handled.
Hussein?
handled.

there is no enemy in Iraq.

Now the chinese are buying oil contracts out of there, giving us a hell of a competition (they got money, we don't)

are they the enemy?

Rich, you fuckin' kill me, we walk away from friends and enemies every fucking day of the week, walking outta there is no unique shit.

But, when we walk out, we should walk thru the Kurdish territories, and tell the Turks to hold their apricots. (Since we fucked up and invaded and fucked up the country and all).

Wait...nevermind; is right, it is the american way, and they want us out of there.

'Mission Accomplished.'

Ron




TheHeretic -> RE: Barry's big flip (9/1/2008 2:19:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NumberSix


what enemy?




            These guys


         (Don't fear the link, I took your connection into account)




Owner59 -> RE: Barry's big flip (9/1/2008 2:23:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

quote:

ORIGINAL: NumberSix

Not at all having anything to do with Iraq.  No way shape or form.  The closest you can come is that they exist in the same part of the hemi-sphere.



         Right, Ron.  Because nothing strikes fear into the heart of an enemy like giving up and running away from the last fight you started...  Oh wait... nevermind.





So we should continue a stupid,deadly,counterproductive occupation of a non-relevant nation, for the edification a few nuts in the wilderness?.......


N-n-n-n-nope.....


Quick reminder....there`s

Barry Out-o-Iraq....

and

Johny McCentury-in-Iraq

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Choose carefully.




TheHeretic -> RE: Barry's big flip (9/1/2008 2:30:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59



Quick reminder....there`s

Barry Out-o-Iraq....




       Actually, O59, he is now Barry Out-o-Iraq eventually, and right into Afghanistan and Pakistan.  Haven't the Dem's gotten the updated talking points out yet?




Hippiekinkster -> RE: Barry's big flip (9/1/2008 2:36:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster

Agreed. Thadius does a good job maintaining relevancy. I still don't know if he is able to change his position upon acquiring new data (flip-flopping, to the rigid ideologues), but I would like to think so. I give zero credence to one particular poster who claimed I said I didn't know where aspirin came from, but just couldn't seem to find where I said that, even after repeated requests.

I want to know what, if anything, McSame and Palin will do after ANWR has been drilled and the recovery proves to be inadequate.

I want to know why Palin believes it acceptable to teach the cultural creation myth she believes in in Science classes to the exclusion of all other cultural creation myths.

I want to know if McPOW is suffering PTSD after his years in captivity.

I want to know why McBush wants to deny Americans the same quality of health care that he gets.

I want to know why the anti-freedom-of-choice Palin completely ignores the soul in her beliefs about when life begins.

for starters...


I have no problem with changing my position if I find it to be the wrong one, I am a realist not an idealist, however at times I have idealistic goals.
I'm very much the same, except I am on the other side of the aisle from you.

quote:

You do realize the way that natural gas is found and recovered?  So there is going to be lots of drilling regardless of which ticket is elected. Simply no choice on that one.
I have a little familiarity with the oil patch. I spent almost 10 years with Shell E&P (Houston-Bellaire Research Center) working in the Enhanced Recovery Research Department. This is a decent primer on the topic: http://www.naturalgas.org/naturalgas/well_completion.asp
There won't be all that many wells spudded. It costs a lot of money to lease a rig, get it shipped to the Arctic, get all the drilling fluid components up there, build a camp, fly or truck in the food and other supplies, ship in the casing etc., build the rataining pond for spent mud, et cetera. As of today, I don't have any real environmental objections to drilling, as long as SOTA teks are used to prevent ground contamination. I oppose it because the US is not in dire need of ANWR and other restricted reserves yet. This is a whole other topic, though. No hijack.

quote:

From what I understand of her position on teaching creationism, it is not an exclusive thing, it is supposed to be in addition to evolution, I would guess that if other creationist theories were presented they could be taught as well.  Explain to me again why keeping information away from folks is bad?  Shouldn't they be able to compare and contrast and then make an educated decision on the evidence or lack of that either or all present?
First off, Creationism is NOT a competing theory. It is mythology, pure and simple, and has no place in a science classroom. There is no information being imparted. It does not meet the rigid criteria of being a Scientific Theory.
"Kenneth R. Miller, a biology professor from Brown University and noted author and commentator opposed to the intelligent design and creationist movements, was the first witness. He testified as an expert witness that "Intelligent design is not a testable theory and as such is not generally accepted by the scientific community." He said that the idea of intelligent design was not subject to falsification, but many claims made by intelligent-design advocates had been falsified. Asked what the harm was in reading the statement, Miller gave a two-fold response. 1) "[I]t falsely undermines the scientific status of evolutionary theory and gives students a false understanding of what theory actually means."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District

quote:

One side believes that it is conception, and one side believes at birth. A particular candidate says he isn't sure when a baby is entitled to human rights, as it is above his pay grade.
My point is that this is ultimately a religious question (when life begins), so it follows that a fetus isn't a human being until it acquires a soul. When is that?

quote:

As Biden is just a couple years younger that McCain, should we worry about his brain surgery?  Careful what you ask for in comparisons [;)]
Perhaps that is a valid question as well; however, Biden isn't running for POTUS, is he? 




NumberSix -> RE: Barry's big flip (9/1/2008 2:37:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

quote:

ORIGINAL: NumberSix


what enemy?




           These guys


        (Don't fear the link, I took your connection into account)


Oh, yeah, thats where the trouble started.......again, what does that have to do with Iraq?  Absolutely nothing, and as long as we are fucking around in Iraq, we are not doing a goddamn thing about the perpetrators.

Bush is a fuckwad, a liar, and an incompetent.  I want the head of Osama Bin Lauden.  He or McCain will not deliver it thru Iraq, cause it never was, and now ain't there.

Ron







Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125