RE: Prisoner Slave submissives (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


DiurnalVampire -> RE: Prisoner Slave submissives (10/25/2008 1:31:34 PM)

My only problem with the incarceration slaves is the one-sidedness of the arangement. If I cold incarcerate a slave and they still be useful to me, then I might be a lot more attracted to the idea. However, an incarcerated slave is a expense. They return nothing to the household, but they do drain from it. If I am going to put the energy into keeping someone, I expect to have some sort of return from the deal. Fox is a servant. He cleans, he helps with the finances, and he serves emotionally and sexually when desired.
I dont think I could enjoy having someone caged, knowing I was working to keep them maintined while they were doing nothing to better my life or make things easier on me. Maybe it is just my take on it, but I dont see the point in keeping a slave who is worthless outside of their own desire for incarceration. It seems to me someone in that position is the one in control, and I would be serving them by keeping them housed and fed.

DV




ken54 -> RE: Prisoner Slave submissives (10/25/2008 1:57:06 PM)

I guess it depends on your definitions. Being kept as a prisoner for a limited time ( a sentence of 2 or 3 days). Being put to work. Being used at your jailer's whim. Being kept until you have fullfilled a condition. All these things appeal to me and have worked in the past. I would especially like to commend the post of PainCompliant. All those points make a lot of sense, especially about hearing approaching footsteps and not know what is going to happn next. Being held prisoner can be made to work.
Ken54




DiurnalVampire -> RE: Prisoner Slave submissives (10/25/2008 2:00:20 PM)

The majority of those interested in a prisoner positon are, however, looking to be confined 24/7.
Not short term confinement, but if you talk to them they want permanent, 24/7 confinement. I fully appreciate PainComplaint's post on what HE gets from it. However, tats from the submissive point of view. My dishes would still be getting done by me. My massages and manicures would be neglected if someone needs to be confined all the time. 

DV




flower2007 -> RE: Prisoner Slave submissives (10/25/2008 2:17:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ken54

I guess it depends on your definitions. Being kept as a prisoner for a limited time ( a sentence of 2 or 3 days).


That'sa what I've always wanted.  2/47 permanantly just isn't reasonable (come on, I have a job and a mortgage and all that real life stuff).  A weekend is really more realistic.  And for me, it's attractive simply because of the consenual non-consent part.  Voluntarily submitting doesn't do much to me, but being forced to submit by virtue of my status as a prisoner is very attractive.




CageMe777 -> RE: Prisoner Slave submissives (10/25/2008 2:25:19 PM)

I would become a full time caged slave, if i found the right women,, but at last,,,,, its just a pipe dream...




hairslave -> RE: Prisoner Slave submissives (10/25/2008 4:01:37 PM)


i agree that to be imprisoned would have to be; something that could only be to the capturers advantage , therefore to Her benefit not his. Or if it were to be beneficial to the captive,. That it would be an unintended benefit and therefore only secondary.
I have had a fantasy of being hold prisoner under a group of women who would take six hour shifts to supervise me, wile i would have to perform tasks for Them by producing things for Their collective benefit and,  (or ) to be Their's to use, how ever it would be to Their singularly or collative benefit and, amusement.  i would be confinded in a basement area where i would eat, sleep and, perform some short of on going tasks, wile my capturers could stay in a more inviting and comfortable atmosphere up stairs. They would also have the added benefit of requiring me to perform what ever extra tasks, that would make Their personal life more amusing, comfortable, enjoyable and simplistic for They.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DiurnalVampire

My only problem with the incarceration slaves is the one-sidedness of the arangement. If I cold incarcerate a slave and they still be useful to me, then I might be a lot more attracted to the idea. However, an incarcerated slave is a expense. They return nothing to the household, but they do drain from it. If I am going to put the energy into keeping someone, I expect to have some sort of return from the deal. Fox is a servant. He cleans, he helps with the finances, and he serves emotionally and sexually when desired.
I dont think I could enjoy having someone caged, knowing I was working to keep them maintined while they were doing nothing to better my life or make things easier on me. Maybe it is just my take on it, but I dont see the point in keeping a slave who is worthless outside of their own desire for incarceration. It seems to me someone in that position is the one in control, and I would be serving them by keeping them housed and fed.

DV




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
2.734375E-02