|
hairslave -> RE: Prisoner Slave submissives (10/25/2008 4:01:37 PM)
|
i agree that to be imprisoned would have to be; something that could only be to the capturers advantage , therefore to Her benefit not his. Or if it were to be beneficial to the captive,. That it would be an unintended benefit and therefore only secondary.
I have had a fantasy of being hold prisoner under a group of women who would take six hour shifts to supervise me, wile i would have to perform tasks for Them by producing things for Their collective benefit and, (or ) to be Their's to use, how ever it would be to Their singularly or collative benefit and, amusement. i would be confinded in a basement area where i would eat, sleep and, perform some short of on going tasks, wile my capturers could stay in a more inviting and comfortable atmosphere up stairs. They would also have the added benefit of requiring me to perform what ever extra tasks, that would make Their personal life more amusing, comfortable, enjoyable and simplistic for They.
quote:
ORIGINAL: DiurnalVampire
My only problem with the incarceration slaves is the one-sidedness of the arangement. If I cold incarcerate a slave and they still be useful to me, then I might be a lot more attracted to the idea. However, an incarcerated slave is a expense. They return nothing to the household, but they do drain from it. If I am going to put the energy into keeping someone, I expect to have some sort of return from the deal. Fox is a servant. He cleans, he helps with the finances, and he serves emotionally and sexually when desired.
I dont think I could enjoy having someone caged, knowing I was working to keep them maintined while they were doing nothing to better my life or make things easier on me. Maybe it is just my take on it, but I dont see the point in keeping a slave who is worthless outside of their own desire for incarceration. It seems to me someone in that position is the one in control, and I would be serving them by keeping them housed and fed.
DV
|
|
|
|
