Celeres
Posts: 166
Joined: 3/9/2008 Status: offline
|
Well... in the White House, as well as many other positions of power, time moves much quicker than one really thinks. Think of President Bush's last 8 years. First year or so was getting used to the White House. Second year, when he finally learned the ropes, and was able to REALLY command and lead, our nation was under attack. Before he knew it, he was running for re-election. After narrowly winning re-election, he had to focus on reuniting this nation (as he only won with a narrow margin). In fact, it all came down to a bunch of hanging chad. (And yes, the plural of "chad" is "chad") hah Anyway, with that out of the way, the Dems retook Congress and since President Bush is a lame-duck president, there really is not much for him to do since Democrats (just like the Republicans did under Clinton) held key legislation back, and sent forward ones that President Bush had to veto. I honestly believe that President Bush really wanted to change and reform our entire nation and he did what he thought was best for the nation. However, in the end, we live in a democracy where the voice of the many are heard, instead of one single voice from behind the Resolute Desk. Also, a smaller detail which is probably overlooked since it was nearly 8 years ago, but President Bush was not given a "Honeymoon Phase" from the media. Traditionally speaking, First-term presidents are given a couple of weeks, to a couple of months to, in essence, "get their act together." President G. W. Bush was pretty much in the cross-hairs the moment he took office. I hope that answered your question, from my personal opinion. --Celeres
|