CallaFirestormBW -> RE: Sex with slaves? (9/9/2008 7:15:22 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MistressStiletto I am a switch exploring my dominant tendencies. I have topped in extended scenes, but never in a 24/7 situation. The Alpha Master has agreed that I should look for a slave of my own, either male, female, or couple. That part doesn't concern Him much, as long as the individual(s) have the right mental mindset. He mentioned last night that if there was a male slave in the house, not only would it compromise my position as a Mistress to fuck him, but also to french kiss him. He says that would put a crack in the structure. For those beautiful Ladies who have male slaves, what do you think of this idea? Do you think your slave sees you as less than Dominant if you kiss them, or share other acts of intimacy with them? Heck, even in the Gorean structure, which is probably one of the most male-centric slavery models that folks use, a woman is allowed to "couch" her own slave. It is up to the woman dominant to set the limits/boundaries/expectations. Now, this being said, you are in a situation where you are someone -else's- submissive party -- which, to me, means that someone else makes the rules for -you-, even while you make the rules for your boy. With that in place, if your d-type person says "no kissie, no sex", the actual -justification- is sort of less relevant, in my mind, than the "these are the ground rules" aspect. If it is observed from that viewpoint, then the 'reason' is really 'because I said so'. In my experience, male or female, there is no reason that a servant cannot serve sexually, be kissed, etc., as long as both parties are very clear about who is doing the serving and who is doing the controlling. I've never had an issue with it, even in less ''formalized" situations where I was the tacit controlling party in the relationship. Calla Firestorm
|
|
|
|