RE: submissive to one or submissive to ALL? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master



Message


Padriag -> RE: submissive to one or submissive to ALL? (1/8/2006 8:33:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: infyniti

Do others expect submissives to be submissive to ALL Dominants?

You seem to be asking two seperate questions here, though you may not realize it. On the one hand, you are asking and it has been discussed in this thread as to whether or not a submissive should submit to all dominants and be available for their use. On the other hand, you seem to be concerned with a question of social etiquette when you say this...

quote:

I have come across my share of people who believe this to be true. " Submissives do not talk to Dominants like that." I do not subscribe to that mentality. Apparently this has caused some people to either label me " Dom" or state that I have no respect for other Doms.
This causes problem in group settings. Why? Other Doms. do not get " yes Sir" No sir, or master anything in conversation. I am polite and treat everyone as i would someone in a work setting.

Addressing someone as Sir or Maam, or responding in a mildly deferential manner is not the same as submitting to someone. But it is a social convention expected among some groups. It appears the group you are involved with expect this. Ever hear the phrase, when in Rome do as the Romans do? You're entering their group, these are their social expectations... either abide by them or leave the group, those are your choices. It seems, from what you later say...
quote:

Considering Master and i do not entertain this thought processs we have been talked about, left out and pretty much are not the people that are invited to the party.

That the group has already made that choice for you and all that is left is to make as much of a graceful exit as you can at this point and find another group.

What wasn't clear was if this statement...
quote:

It seems that this area of New England has the attitude of " Pass the sub, please"

..was really accurate. Was this group actually expecting that you be passed about the group for all to use? Or was it that they were simply expecting you to abide by their rules of etiquette regarding forms of address. Some groups do indeed feel slaves should be freely shared among all, including fetish play and sexual use, so it is possible what you are saying was the literal truth. But it is also true that some groups do not require that, but do have expectations regarding social behavior within the group... that is, rules of etiquette.

quote:

What do others expect in a social group setting?

Depends on the group. I've run into the whole gamut... from groups with virtually no rules at all, to those who had some expectations regarding etiquette only at group events and get togethers, to some with very formal rules of etiquette, to some who expected slaves to be naked and ready for anything that might be asked of them at group events. Each of these groups has their own rules and expectations, and so long as the majority of the group agrees on that, its valid. If you don't like it, leave the group.

quote:

This has caused us to become quite the " solo" couple.

And the problem with this is? If you read these boards for long you'll discover I generally eschew any groups and want little to do with them. For me personally I find at this point in life most of them have very little to offer me in return for what they might ask of me. I don't hate the groups for this, its a personal choice on my part and I simply go my own way. Of course if you feel the need to be part of a group then you have a problem, in which case you have about three possible choices, find a group that you agree with 100%, find a group you can make comfortable compromises with regarding their rules, or found your own group.

quote:

It just amazes me that some people can say they are Dom and just expect the world to bow down to them.

Why would that surprise you... people make all kinds of claims all the time, you've not watched TV ads lately? On the contrary, its rather predictable. People want to feel powerful and important and go to all kinds of very creative lengths to feel that way. Putting on a title and expecting others to honor it is just another such scheme.




MasterLark -> RE: submissive to one or submissive to ALL? (1/9/2006 3:51:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoulBelow

I am owned. If my master asked me to call another Dom master or sir then I would but he never has. I belong to him and only he has earned my love and respect and the right to put me on my knees. I am respectful people but I can only submit to people I have infinite love and respect for, my master cares for me and would never let anyone treat me disrespectfully either.


Right answer.




IronBear -> RE: submissive to one or submissive to ALL? (1/12/2006 12:02:51 PM)

Fangs pretty much said it all, the sub/slave is submissive to his or her Master/Mistress and to who ever else said sub/slave is ordered to be submissive to. Having said that, there is no call for a sub/slave to be rude to any other Dominant (unless the dominant is obnoxious). However there is the question as to what is meant by being submissive. I believe that there is a difference to submittig to your Dominant and acting in a submissive manner to other Dominants and yet not being required to bow down/kneel and/or take orders from all and sundry.

Any slave in my collar will (and I do mean WILL) kneel (karta) when greeting any Gorean Free. She will kneel to those non Goreans whom I have designated. She will adcdress all Gorean free and those non Gorean whom I have sedignated as either Master or Mistress unless told other wise. She will address other Dominants respectfully by what ever mode they prefer. She will inform those who make demands of her that she is under my orders not to do so untill they have cleared it with me. She will trot over to me and report any verbal or other abuse given her immediately at which time I shall amble over to the offending Dominant and discuss the matter with my finger tapping them on the probiscus to get the message home that it is hands off my property.
(All in a friendly manner y'know [:D])




Arpig -> RE: submissive to one or submissive to ALL? (1/12/2006 7:48:56 PM)

I agree pretty much with what IronBear said. I expect my sub to be submissive to me, and to behave in a manner that will not embarass me when interacting with others (luckily for her I am very unconventional and do not embarass easily).
Likewise, if some other dominant wished to play with my sub, I would expect them to approach me, and not even "proposition" my sub until after they had my ok...she is mine after all, I mean how would you feel if I just hopped in your car and took it for a spin, just because I am a driver?




LuckyAlbatross -> RE: submissive to one or submissive to ALL? (1/12/2006 7:56:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig
my sub until after they had my ok...she is mine after all, I mean how would you feel if I just hopped in your car and took it for a spin, just because I am a driver?

Yeah this is a problem- you can't expect behavior from anyone else you own. Not all subs are clearly marked with license plates and locks. Unless you have a sign around your subs neck saying "Ask the dom before you ask the sub" you can't fault someone else for asking the sub first.

It's then the subs responsibility to tell the asker any requirements or preferences that need to be fulfilled first.

THEN the asker is responsible for either politely bowing out, or going along with the preferences/requirements.

But before the asker is clearly informed, absolutely nothing is wrong with doing any normal social interactions, including asking to play.




Arpig -> RE: submissive to one or submissive to ALL? (1/12/2006 8:13:23 PM)

true enough LA, however I was really thinking more along the lines of the "sub-for-all" attitude mentioned in the OP. And maybe the car analogy wasn't the best, but then again i don't own a car....[:)]




nephandi -> RE: submissive to one or submissive to ALL? (1/12/2006 8:29:57 PM)

i see nothing wrong whit expecting a simple Sir or Madam or exapecting a submissive to act in a deferiential manner, but there is a differance between that and having sex whit them, also if a Dominant asked me to get him a drink, i would feel that to be okey, if he expected me to be respectful, okey, but to expect me to have sex whit him at the drop of a hat, that is stretching it a bit far.




subkaille -> RE: submissive to one or submissive to ALL? (1/13/2006 11:53:41 AM)

my Master expects me to respect all, if i am disrespected, then i bring it to Him to deal with, but i do not call all Doms Sir or Master as i have only One and submit only to Him.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.320313E-02