MsIncognito
Posts: 742
Joined: 5/24/2005 Status: offline
|
First, thank you for a well written and thought out piece. This is such a refreshing change for these boards. I did disagree with several things and I hope you won't mind me tossing in my POV. quote:
ORIGINAL: Slaveboiz In the SM community today there seems to be a steady pull to understand the nature and intent of play. I would surmise this new view of play has become more popular today as we live in a culture of electronics and machines. How so? I'm curious as to how you think the culture of electronics and machines, as you put it, is somehow linked to a desire to understand the nature and intent of play. IMO, humans have always sought to understand themselves and their motivations. Well, many do. Some clearly do not and that isn't necessarily a bad thing. Introspection for the purposes of understanding and clarity is something I fully support. However, incessant navel gazing is a counter productive avoidance technique in my books. It can be a fine line between those two at times. quote:
Often our connections to the outside world are done in a fragment of the time it used to be. We have all become slaves to technology; the computers, cell phones, and technologies that make things that once were made by hand, not to mention Wal-Mart lol. Seriously, we are vastly becoming a world that moves way to fast. Although you may not have meant it in this way, I found you tend to use quite a few generalizations such as "we have all become slaves to technology" and I find those are not really accurate. I'll concede that many people have become slaves to technology but not all of us. I'm the first to admit that I'm an electronic gadget/toy whore. I love my integrated phone/PDA/web browser that fits neatly in my pocket. It's the coolest little thing. However, I'm not a slave to it. I have the ability to turn off my cell phone, computer, phone and TV and so does everyone else. These things are conveniences which should make our lives easier. If we allow them to become things which take over our lives then we need to re-evaluate how we use these technologies. quote:
The very nature of technology is causing us to be disconnected from ourselves, let alone each other. If anything I find that the problem is that these things leave us "too connected" but in a superficial way. I do not want everyone and their dog to be able to contact me on my cell phone whenever they feel like it. As a result only a handful of people have my cell number. I will never give it to my boss or anyone I feel will abuse it. The phone is for my convenience, not the convenience of others. quote:
This pull towards a spiritual look at SM is an attempt to make sense of ourselves in a world that barely sees us. Although I will agree that a spiritual approach to SM is in part about making sense of ourselves I think it can go far beyond that. For me it also contains an element of transcendance on a physical, emotional and psychological plane. quote:
Many folks are exposed to the erotic side of play through porn, fiction and the internet, with little understanding of the deeper more spiritual meaning behind the things we do both in and out side the dungeon. Perhaps for some people there is no spiritual element to SM. In fact, I don't see anything wrong with engaging in play without ever feeling a need to make it spiritual. In part, I think some people want to add a spiritual element to SM because in their minds it elevates SM beyond just some freaky shit we enjoy. It helps to legitimize and elevate it so that when vanillas cock an eyebrow we can so "No, really, it's not just a kinky thing, it's a spiritual thing!" While some of us want, need or enjoy a spiritual element to our SM play I don't think it's necessary and I don't think it's any "better" because we choose to add that element to it. quote:
When we begin our journey into SM one may hear a lot about the release of endorphins and headspace but do we ever delve any deeper then that? Some do and some don't. Delving deeper is not required nor is one better than the other. quote:
As my experience had shown me there are generally three types of players; the erotic player; those who only seek play for its erotic content and as a sexual stimulant. The endorphin player; better known as the “true masochist or true sadist” and lastly the spiritual player; one who plays to gain insight about his or her spiritual self. Of course we all float in and out of all the above mentioned. However, I would like to present to you is my thoughts on the spiritual player. I don't think everyone floats around between these categories. Again, some do and others do not. I know some who are strictly endorphin players. They don't have a submissive bone in their body but they are masochists to the core. I know others for whom it's all foreplay and a prelude to intercourse. quote:
If I take an overview of all the cultures of the world, I note a consistent theme, that theme seems to entail rites and rituals of passage in one form or another, mainly those forms are to transition a child into adulthood; more specifically boyhood to manhood. Even here in western culture we have certain rites of passage and connectedness. Look at the father that takes his son out for his first hunting trip, or the indoctrination into a fraternity, just to name a few. Women have their rituals as well. Jewish girls have bat mitzvahs to mark the beginning of their journey into womanhood. Many native tribes also have rituals for females at puberty. Even in North American culture there are female rites of passage - first menses, first bra, first kiss, first date, etc. They may not be as elaborate as he rites of passage in some other cultures but they are nonetheless significant. quote:
So you ask, what does this have to do with play? Rites of passage usually follow the idea of a test of sorts, the test has the intent to transform or transition a person into something new. It takes us from our every day life and tests our limits, our endurance and our connection to something or someone viewed as more important then ourselves. Its focus is usually about the body and spirit of that person. Here I have to disagree. Some rites of passage may take the form of tests and have a spiritual focus but that is not necessary. IMO, a rite of passage is merely something that marks a significant turning point in a person's life. It does not have to be a test. It can be a noisey, raucus celebration (stag parties, anyone?) or it can be a quiet, solemn marker. quote:
So again what does this have to do with play? Play allows us to separate from the dominant cultures we live in, in order to connect with our own bodies and the spirit of who we are. Often time’s pain/ sensation play is the vehicle for that connectiveness. The feelings we experience in play are what transforms us into more consciously aware beings. Lastly it connects us to others (top or bottom and community) it in effect, is a ritualistic rite of passage, not in the sense of the stages of life, but rather in the sense that we use the vehicle of pain to transcend our minds and bodies to a better more conducive state. We become more connect with our bodies in play than in any other state; other than perhaps sex or perhaps really good drugs. For some of us play can do those things but I would not equate it with a rite of passage. I think it can be a transforming experience for some or even many but that shouldn't be considered a forgone conclusion. While pain/play can assist in connectivity to ones self and to others (or more accurately the other(s) you are playing with) it is ultimately your willingness to be open to that connectivity that facilitates that transformation. Not every wants to or is capable of going there. They may have other vehicles for experiencing that connectivity that have nothing to do with SM play. quote:
Often we are presented with play as away to escape from the dominant culture but in fact play is very much the opposite. Play is a form of heightened connectedness with the mind, body, spirit and to each other. Earlier on you said that play was a way to seperate from the dominant culture in order reconnect with our own bodies and who we are. Now you seem to be saying that play is NOT a way to seperate from the dominant culture but the opposite - so that would mean that play is a way in which to connect to the dominant culture? Sorry, I've lost your train of thought here. quote:
So, if you are playing for the first time or have been playing for years, I invite you to look at what primitivism drives us to SM. What are your motives in SM and what is the personal gain you have in your play activities. I also invite you to look at the ritualism of the play you seek, and how it connects you to your mind, body and spirit. A while back there was one of the usually insipid threads about how BDSMers are so much more highly evolved than vanillas and someone (can't remember who) made what I thought was a very interesting point. If BDSM is about tapping into our primal urges can we really consider ourselves more highly evolved or is it actually a process of devolution? I'd say that for me it is a process of personal evolution which hinges on integrating those primal urges in a healthy, responsible and appropriate way. Others mileage may vary. Again, thanks for the great post.
|